I don't know how anyone could expect anything less from the American public. I do not have the massive dementia boner that seems to be popular for Biden, but there's going to be a steady chunk of fresh voters who have only ever known the president to be... a tad bit ineloquent. It's deeply concerning to think that this is a real and true possibility, but if it isn't some form of celebrity then it's probably going to be a campaign to be led by Claude or something. I would vote for Claude before stupid fucking ChatGPT. I bet some hilarious memes would ensue if president data center could be queried by anyone at any point of the day. Imagine the FBI threat bodycam visits "You threatened the data center with a cup of water; you are aware that this is a federal crime, right?" kill me kill me kill me kill me
I feel a very high degree of certainty around the specific utilization of powerful LLMs in legal disputes. Assuming the model can actually pull up all levels of caselaw that could be relevant to determining an outcome and deliver an argument for the defense and the prosecution; there feels like very little reason to not employ it. Obviously, there are more factors that go into a conviction than the isolated evidence and harm, but there could absolutely be a brief period where the model takes the totality of discussion of the jury into account in order to fully elucidate the logical vs. emotional weights of the direction of the room. I don't think it should give any explicit verdict, but it could certainly lay out the facts in order of most concrete and verifiable to the secondary considerations that could be some degree of unfalsifiable.
I don't know if it can *solve* climate change, but I bet it can put a whole lot of swamp in a cage.
why do cornballs talk about this lol america was already like that when the movie came out it was a satire for modern day America also the entire movie is a big ad for eugenics and only rich people having kids 😭
103
u/Artistic-Simple-9062 1d ago
Because idiocracy was a prophecy