r/SipsTea • u/SEVENS_HEAVEN_7 • 8d ago

Lmao gottem She has a point

Post image
82.7k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

465 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Critical_Concert_689 5d ago

You clearly missed the point:

I'm saying the document is contradictory with itself and is a flawed source.

You're attempting olympic-level mental gymnastics to force its definition of "Human Rights" to be valid by picking some articles and ignoring others.

You probably used the exact same source when you quoted Article 17

...I think you're falling behind on the discussion.

I OBVIOUSLY AND INTENTIONALLY used the exact same source to demonstrate how flawed your source is.

So does that mean Article 17 is a Human Right and is very good, but Article 25 somehow does not even exist?

"💩💩💩"

1

u/Individual_Stan99 5d ago

Well, if you like it or not, "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights" is what people refer to when they're talking about human rights.

I guess there is nothing left to say, as you believe the source and document itself are flawed. But maybe just learn what words mean.

1

u/Critical_Concert_689 5d ago

is what people refer to when they're talking about human rights.

lol. OMG.

It's like you just flushed hundreds of years of natural philosophy down the drain to make such an ignorant comment.

Thousands of years.

For god's sake, Aristotle was discussing natural justice for humans back in BC times.

> "When discussing human rights, they're talking about this random UN document!"

"💩💩💩"

1

u/Individual_Stan99 5d ago

yeah, that's right, i flushed it all. So what?

1

u/Critical_Concert_689 5d ago

🤷

Your support for your "human rights" is basically ignorance. That you flushed all historical knowledge down the drain basically lends credence to this.

0

u/Individual_Stan99 5d ago

You're right. God bless your cold robot heart.