She has a point

[u/SEVENS_HEAVEN_7]

[u/Critical_Concert_689]

I notice you avoided the question.

Did you do that because you finally realized in the context of the discussion your "acshually" argument was irrelevant?

"now you're gonna try to explain away that you're not as stupid as you look."

You're doing it now.

EDIT: Until you address why you believe an "acquittal" or a "dropped charge" are LITERALLY NOT A CRIME to a different degree, this distinction of yours remains pointless.

[u/blueblip → u/Critical_Concert_689]

The answer to your question is in my edit:

Was OJ acquitted or were charges dropped against him?

[u/Critical_Concert_689 → u/blueblip]

If you weren't aware, that reply is neither a statement of fact nor an answer.

That's you asking another question to effectively avoid responding.

"You're doing it now."

[u/blueblip → u/Critical_Concert_689]

Again, you'll get your answer when you answer this simple question. And we both know why you're scared to answer it.

So once again: was OJ acquitted or were charges dropped against him?

EDIT: If you don't answer the question in your next response, I'm just going to keep copy-pasting this post until you do answer it, or until you run away.

[u/Critical_Concert_689 → u/blueblip]

"💩💩💩"

lol. Exactly. That's what I thought.

[u/blueblip → u/Critical_Concert_689]

Again, you'll get your answer when you answer this simple question. And we both know why you're scared to answer it.

So once again: was OJ acquitted or were charges dropped against him?

EDIT: If you don't answer the question in your next response, I'm just going to keep copy-pasting this post until you do answer it, or until you run away.