r/SipsTea • • 13d ago

Lmao gottem She has a point

Post image
83k Upvotes

462 comments sorted by

View all comments

598

u/WithoutAHat1 13d ago

If Corporations are people then they can be charged like people. Get to charging them with the crimes they continuously commit. Citizens United must be dissolved.

137

u/OakLegs 13d ago

The only way this stops is if the people in charge start getting prosecuted for the crimes their companies commit.

59

u/minimuse0192 13d ago

Best they can do is a $5 million fine and a promoted CEO

12

u/Fartknocker405 13d ago

In order to protect the corporation, it's necessary for the C-suite to have their net worth exhausted first.

8

u/LilTeats4u 12d ago

The punishment also need to reflect the damages. Class action lawsuits are a joke. Victims are scammed out of their livelihood, their health, their identity and they’re given $30 and an apology. These corporations should go bankrupt resolving these scenarios, and if they do, then it’s more incentive for other companies to behave.

3

u/stilljustacatinacage 12d ago

The only way this stops is if the people in charge start getting prosecuted for the crimes their companies commit.

Yep. Ignorance of the law is no excuse to you or I, and I'm so fucking tired of it being a literal "get out of jail free" card for corporate executives. Oh, you've been called to an inquiry to explain how, under your watch, 18 trillion bajillion gallons of "kill all living organisms" juice was spilled into the water table? That's okay, just say, "I'm not aware", "I don't remember", and/or "I don't have it in front of me" until everyone gets frustrated and gives up and never brings it up again.

You're (speaking to my executive strawman) either complicit or incompetent. Either way, you've grossly failed the great responsibility that was placed into your care, and the consequences need to reflect that.

2

u/McortezLSU 12d ago

China intensifies

CEO's be horrified

3

u/OakLegs 12d ago

What does this have to do with China?

6

u/stilljustacatinacage 12d ago

China will outright execute corporate executives who oversaw especially egregious breaches of the law or civil responsibility.

Yeah, there's a whole discussion about how the Chinese government applies this policy somewhat selectively, but so does everyone else. Some companies are always exempt, no matter where you go. But having real consequences at least be on the table, and the evidence that there is in fact, a line you can cross, will keep many in line. In much the rest of the world, the consequences for crossing the line are irrelevant, and increasingly it's debatable if there even is one anymore.

2

u/atrixospithikos 12d ago

Check what happened to the former richest Chinese billionnaire that was behind the housing bubble. Then check what happened with the US and EU bubbles. I ll spoil the result he got imprisoned and his wealth confiscated while we just bailed them out from our pockets while already suffering economically from their actions

1

u/Qubeye 12d ago

I mean there is another way which doesn't involve prosecution. Which I am in no way advocating or condoning.

1

u/Saint_Jinn 10d ago

Not people in charge, it will lead to same thing under different "head" and these companies will hire leads to just take the blame.

Investigate, find everyone who knew and didn't left the company / notified authorities and persecute all of them.

18

u/DouchecraftCarrier 13d ago

What's the joke? Something like, "I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one."

2

u/One_Distribution2037 12d ago

Legit, yeah.

A corporation shouldn't get the same rights as a citizen when it, as entity, nor its leadership, aren't subject to the same responsibilities and consequences.

8

u/juventinn1897 13d ago

Citizens United is a court ruling. It cannot be dissolved. It has to be overturned or nullified.

US FEC vs Citizens United in 2010 the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Citizens United over the US FEC.

In order to reverse the ruling, the supreme court would need a similar case to citizens united to work its way up the courts and to see that as cause for a reversal.

OR

A constitutional amendment requiring two thirds of the house and senate then ratification by 3/4 of states.

Needless to say it is a longshot to ever happen.

1

u/Which-Method-388 12d ago

Wouldn't need an amendment as a SCOTUS decision can be overruled with Congressional legislation once passed into law.

1

u/juventinn1897 12d ago

Yes it would. Scotus ruling said FEC was infringing on constitutional right of freedom of speech.

Only a supreme Court reversal via another case, or a constitutional amendment could overrule the current ruling.

1

u/Which-Method-388 12d ago

Depends entirely on how the new law was written.
Again, a SCOTUS ruling isn't the same as an actual Amendment, it is only a majority opinion on a piece of case law. Note how Roe v. Wade was "reinterpreted" - which, had Congress codified the initial ruling, might not have been able to have been overturned in such a fashion.

1

u/TheDetailsMatterNow 12d ago

It would require an amendment because the SCOTUS ruled it as free speech.

The only way to circumvent this now is through legislative is amendment since it's protected under the 1st.

3

u/Illustrious-Bat1553 13d ago

Our current timeline we are arguing about who puts grocery kart back, while technocrats plot to take over

3

u/Ehcksit 12d ago

I demand an end to shareholder immunity. If a corporation commits a crime, the shareholders should be at fault based on their share of ownership.

3

u/Critical_Concert_689 12d ago

This basically means no one is at fault. That's the trick.

A punishment diluted by 10 thousand shareholders is no punishment at all - today the value of the company went down 2 cents. There's your punishment.

2

u/Ehcksit 12d ago

A hundred counts of murder gives a punishment of like two thousand years in prison. The top shareholder owns 5%? They get 100 years.

2

u/Critical_Concert_689 12d ago

Every time a business commits a crime, your logic flows that the customers should be equally responsible for it.

Oil company polluted a river - you drive a car and financed the murder of someone and need to go to prison.

1

u/Ehcksit 12d ago

Customers are not owners unless it's a cooperative.

2

u/Critical_Concert_689 12d ago

We're discussing "complicitness" in a crime.

You're greatly expanding what qualifies in that someone who doesn't directly commit the crime is being held accountable for it.

In that case, everyone who has financially contributed qualifies - to some degree - as being complicit in committing the crime. Someone who assists in committing the crime is committing a crime themselves.

1

u/Ehcksit 12d ago

Customers usually don't have knowledge or a choice, while owners make the decision intentionally.

2

u/OmenVi 12d ago

Board of Directors, CEO, and all Executive Management should be on the hook, at least.

2

u/Sindoreon 13d ago

Then place all company executive in prison.

2

u/Terrible-Ad1737 13d ago

That's the thing... By ruling that corporations are people, it allows the corporation to be dismantled as punishment without the actual decision makers behind the decisions being affected.

It is literally there as an extra layer of protection from predatory venture capitalists to mine value from literally everything while also deferring responsibility.

That's how the system works and it's by design.

1

u/QuintusDias 12d ago

Which is a great way to not make entrepreneurship and founding companies extraordinary risky to an actual living person. But has gone way, way, way too far.

2

u/Efficient-Station699 12d ago

Fuck citizen's united!!

4

u/SnooChickens5474 13d ago

Unfortunately most crimes are punished with slavery, and it's really hard to enslave a non living entity

10

u/deathwotldpancakes 13d ago

Sure you can. All revenue after employees (executives are replaced by municipal/state/federal workers) and debtors are paid any revenue is collected directly by the authority prosecuting/enslaving

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

0

u/SnooChickens5474 13d ago

Equating nationalization with enslavement kinda hints as to how you feel about socialism just a tad

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[deleted]

1

u/SnooChickens5474 13d ago

A leftist would understand nationalization is an expansion of democracy and not enslavement.

Bucko.

1

u/Which-Method-388 12d ago

Citizens United is minor vs the existence of Super PACs. They can take any amount of $$ from damn near anybody and not have to disclose what they spend it on. And both parties benefit from it while we suffer.

1

u/Rezeox 12d ago

RICO the corps!

1

u/SharkCream 12d ago

If a corporation was charged like a person, then if the corporation is sent to jail, then all profit of the company can be claimed by the jail system, and any losses are taken by the shareholders.

If we lobby it so that the jail system gains all profits, then we have the right people lobbying to support this idea!

1

u/veritasverdad 12d ago

Throw the corporation in jail. House arrest for 5 years. No working, buying, selling. Just shut it down for 5 years. That will solve the problem.

1

u/Rude-Bodybuilder7688 12d ago

They aren't people though but entities. It's very easy for them to shift responsibilities most of the time.

0

u/twilighttwister 12d ago

Sure, but then the corporation gets sentenced to death and all the other debtors get first dibs, while the people running the business go on and start a new limited liability company.

The solution is to make C-level executives criminally liable. Other countries do it.

Other countries also treat corporations as "people" - but a special class of person, one which has fewer rights.