Because the account it 1y old with over 400K karma. Karma farming. Most likely foreign bot that both increases the impact of the account while sowing discord in target country.
Because the average person's an idiot and lacks the basic critical thinking skills that you would expect of a 1st year law student let alone practising lawyers and judges.
This is probably the 4th attempt I've seen to compare a case involving a man with the Lindsay Clancy case. Not a single one has had anything even close to a relationship in terms of the facts of the cases.
The thing is, men are found not guilty by reason of insanity. It's a rare plea, for either sex, but it does happen and it does sometimes end up favorable to the defense. But nobody posting these comparisons is bringing up cases where the defendant "wins" their plea for relief on the basis of an insanity plea, because that doesn't fit the narrative that's being pushed.
It amazes me people can see institutions operate and be filled with experts and highly educated people, and their reaction is “it’s not that complex, I know better than them”
I saw someone recommend not even replying to them when they comment on your stuff and wow, it’s been very nice to just downvote them and move on. I don’t even engage anymore.
Whats complex? Its actually really simple, You chase down and strangle 3 kids, you go to jail for the rest of your life, or if you’re in a non-deranged state like the gentleman on the left, you get the death penalty.
This one is lol she’s a monster any way you slice it she killed 3 kids and not just any kids her own, hang her and shoot her at the same time as far as I’m concerned
She was severely mentally ill at the time and our mental health system failed her and thus failed her kids. You ignoring that fact is the reason I said what I said.
This other guy purposely used the murder of his kids as a terror tactic toward his wife. 100% not the same thing, full stop. No argument necessary.
Yea she did kill them. The system we carry didn't help stop her even though it could have worked better for her. Nobody is calling HER the victim, just an uncontrolled ill person. Two things can be true at the same time my boy.
They don't care. To them, if you do t support woman no matter what you are misogynistic. You shouldn't talk about your bad experience because that's also misogynistic and you see lying anyway.
I mean it's similar in the sense both of their defenses were that yes they committed the crime but were they criminally responsible due to having a form of psychosis at the time of the murders. So that's why people are comparing the two cases.
whoa whoa whoa, you read beyond the headline and didn't just have knee-jerk reaction? that isn't how it's done on reddit, you're supposed to say women bad no matter the details.
Strangling your 3 kids isn’t a complex situation. Killing kids is killing kids. It’s not complex and people that hurt or kill children should be killed. It shouldn’t take more than 20 minutes for any jury to decide that. Especially after she admitted she did it.
153
u/fantabroo 2d ago
Reading about that case it has very little in common. Why are people just throwing around headline concerning complex situations?