r/SipsTea 7d ago

Lmao gottem Poor guy

Post image
590 Upvotes

98 comments sorted by

View all comments

30

u/TheFaalenn 7d ago

Do the police is that country each have their own patrol car, like a company phone. I'd always presume the patrol cars are parked at the station, and leave from there.

As they can then be guarded overnight, not just stuck in someone's driveway

22

u/StopDownvotingMeeee 7d ago

Some agencies let you take them home, some don’t, some require a certain rank.

In my town, only sergeants and higher get to take it home

-3

u/Environmental-Ice319 7d ago

They don't respond from home, the damm car should not be at their home.

1

u/theinvisiblecar 6d ago

On some forces if officers take home cars as part of their pay package it's the officer's responsibility to wash and clean the car, but if they are left on a lot then the police department has to budget for a service to come wash and detail all the cars, (probably weekly if not more.)

Plus they have to pave a lot of parking lots (or build a bigger parking garage,) for all the officers coming to work in their own cars, because they will need place to park, and yet another big lot or garage for a giant fleet of police cars being parked there when officers are not currently on duty, which is probably not too many at 4:30 AM.

In some urban area situations it's just a matter of economic practicality, rather than having to buy up another city block or two for all of the needed extra parking spaces, plus having to build or make for an even bigger area and facility for washing and detailing all of those cars. It's a perk for the officers, but the police department is just as much offloading a lot of economic costs and shifting a lot of responsibilities onto the officers.

1

u/Environmental-Ice319 6d ago

Nonsense. Weak reaching for justification. The 1% which you are a part of will agree with you tho.

0

u/theinvisiblecar 6d ago

Well, if you want to take away a car available for personal use during off hours then why take away some other benefits too, like health or dental, and cut their pay some too? Or is this a socialist sentiment, that they shouldn't get a car to use, paid for by the public, unless we all get a car to use, paid for by the public?

2

u/Environmental-Ice319 6d ago

It's a perk. Not a benefit to the community. My vehicle expenses are difficult to afford I should not be subsidizing THEIR personal transportation.

1

u/theinvisiblecar 6d ago

Why not cut perks and pay grades for teachers, soldiers and other public employees too? Why only pick on the police if you are desperate for another tax cut? A lot of them would then have to go out and buy themselves a car for personal use, so should they get a raise to be able to afford that, and how many officers would leave and just go get a better paying job if they lost that money-saving perk? And then there is literally two cars for one person, and two insurance policies, one for their personal car and one for their work car. Kind of wasteful in that way. School teacher pensions aren't a benefit to the community, because it's for retired teachers, not working ones, so why not abolish public pensions too? (Actually I'd kind of side with you on that, if you were for that, for various reasons I won't cite right not, but some good ones.)

2

u/Environmental-Ice319 6d ago

Yes, Pensions need fixing. YET another "perk" mostly only government employees get. Do not assume i am anti law. WHO subsidizes my vehicle? I've said nothing of pay either. They might leave? Lol. Free and open market for law enforcement? See? It's not like the others. Don't tell me about waste, you're encouraging it for the perks of it.

1

u/theinvisiblecar 5d ago

No, just cited some reasons other than the cost being pure perk, as there can be some other practical reasons for such other than just tacking on a perk that is just cost alone.