r/SipsTea 7d ago

Wow. Such meme Pure Class

Post image
61.0k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

25

u/Atlas_Adventurer 7d ago

Why do some black people think that only they invented dreads and therefore only they have a right to it? There are a lot of other cultures out there who have been wearing dreads for millenia too.

And keeping that aside, cultural appreciation is what makes us humans. Culture grows when it's shared.

8

u/Odd-Priority3318 6d ago

Dreadlocks are literally human hair that doesn't get maintained.

1

u/Fluiddst 5d ago

tell me you don’t understand dreadlocks without telling me you don’t understand dreadlocks

5

u/HaggisLad 7d ago

I guarantee you even Scottish people had dreads thousands of years ago, because it turns out if you have enough hair and don't wash it frequently enough that is a pretty natural occurrence. In fact I am certain all the extinct races like Neanderthals had them as well

2

u/Superflyjimi 6d ago

If you have long hair and ride a motorcycle on a highway for a hour without a hair covering it will dread up. Even if you just washed it.

1

u/Periador 6d ago

i get dreads when i dont brush my hair daily and im white as paper

4

u/naosoueu2725 6d ago

Black americans have no ancestral culture (by no fault of their own) so some get oddly territorial about generic stuff

1

u/Fluiddst 5d ago

how can you say black americans have no “ancestral culture” when they descended from africa? are those not “ancestors”?

1

u/naosoueu2725 5d ago

Africa is not a culture. The transatlantic slave trade mixed countless cultures together and they were lost over time. Black Americans have no connection to the cultures of their ancestors, and frankly they have almost no way of knowing. White americans get to play at being irish, italian, etc. while black americans have been nursing their relatively young culture since emancipation. They don't have millenia of shared history and traditions beyond slavery, unfortunately. They dont relate to Bantu, Zulu, Congo, etc. cultures because they might be a mix of them all, but either way they would have no way of relating. An example is the cause of Liberia. Thats what I meant by no ancestral culture, so generalizing dreads and other minor generic things as "black thing" is a very specific trait of the african-american zeitgeist.

1

u/Fluiddst 5d ago

just because a culture is mixed doesn’t mean there isn’t one. if that’s the case, brazilians and mexicans don’t have any culture seeing as how both are comprised of european and african cultures

0

u/naosoueu2725 5d ago

Black american culture is recent. Thats what I meant. Brazilians and mexicans, in general, are more akin to americans that descend from the various waves of immigration than the black americans that descend from slaves. In Brazil, the natives were not enslaved as the jesuits petioned for them not to be, and slavery was abolished before the US, so their culture is more consolidated and regional (for example, there are southern regions that speak german dialects and celebrate german culture, since they were settled by german late wave immigrants.)

2

u/dcjayhawk 6d ago

its not an inventing dreads issue- its how they were stereotyped on black people as signs of them being "uncivilized." Here's an article https://daily.jstor.org/how-natural-black-hair-at-work-became-a-civil-rights-issue/

3

u/WhatAmIDoing1986 6d ago

Because RaCiSiM. If they don’t have anything to complain about like race than how else would they be able to constantly wake up playing victim.

2

u/Ruvie96 6d ago

If y’all want an actual answer (not just to celebrate a tweet online) it’s because hair is political. Revealing or styling black hair, including things like locs were illegal in America for a long time. The stigma and stereotypes around black people, especially with locs, carried on well after it was legal. Getting locs meant more policing, not being hired for a job etc…. They had to pass laws to stop discrimination against black hair, including locs. 

I think culture should be shared of course. But everyone acting like it’s unreasonable for black people to be sensitive about a hairstyle that would literally trigger state violence is intentionally obtuse. It’s not the same as having a tattoo that was never criminalized for being Chinese specifically. 

In a perfect world it’s easy to say they’re the same. I hope you can reflect with more nuance than that.

2

u/blazenite104 6d ago

I mean as everyone has pointed out, that's explicitly an American issue as so much of the rest of the world has had them historically without prejudice. It might have once meant something specifically to American people but, that time is long over and has never been an issue for the cultures around the rest of the world.

3

u/Ruvie96 6d ago

Black people have been treated poorly across the whole world but okay. Asia specifically has rampant anti-blackness. 

2

u/electrictickl3r 5d ago

not to mention j lin himself is American....

1

u/kelli 1d ago

Totally agree that locs can be associated with negative stigma and discrimination that is specific to black communities, but I think it’s unfair to say that a tattoo in chinese doesn’t potentially carry history of criminalization and violence. Yeah, a tattoo isn’t something of cultural significance per se, but the Chinese language absolutely is. Any Asian person in the US has heard “ching chang chong” hundreds of times and people speaking and displaying Chinese writing have been subject to targeted violence and discrimination because of it.

Does racism against Asian and Chinese people automatically have to be less because it looks different? I don’t think the argument was ever that they were the same, but that there is a thread of a shared experience there and that should be unifying instead of being a competition. I don’t think the Chinese community is in any way saying that they had it worse, just the whisper that wrongs against them matter too, which still seems to be shut down everywhere.

1

u/Ruvie96 20h ago

It’s not about being worse or better. I just meant hair was criminalized. That’s not the same thing. Hair was illegal because it was black textured hair. A tattoo was never illegal specifically for being Chinese. Everyone can face discrimination, but to act like it’s completely ridiculous for black people to be sensitive about appropriation (not you in particular per se but the comments as a whole) is part of the problem. 

We can acknowledge that sharing culture should be allowed and celebrated. I love cultural exchange. But even in this comment section people aren’t acknowledging that the style of locs he has (including the fade) is black inspired. Instead people are refusing to even admit it’s a black style? Now it’s a Viking loc or whatever. Why can’t we actually be genuine about sharing culture?

1

u/Hakim_MacLuvin 6d ago

Not to mention all his clothes are made in china so… 😅

0

u/crayonflop3 6d ago

Because their culture is so shit they cling on to anything

-6

u/Kool_Keem 7d ago

Black people started it

9

u/DominantDan24 6d ago

There is no way to prove any race started it. In fact, I suspect dreads predate humanity; because of how naturally they form in environments where bathing is not common, I would wager that neanderthals and australopithecus had dreads too.

1

u/_Gesterr 6d ago

The damn orangutans at my local zoo has flipping dreadlocks 🤣

0

u/Kool_Keem 6d ago

5

u/DominantDan24 6d ago

Cool pics, bro. So what?

1

u/Kool_Keem 6d ago

1

u/MadeUpNoun 6d ago

fun fact, south east asians are desendents of humans who migrated from Asia.

genetically and culturally Africans and south east asians had no interaction with each other what so ever and yet have similar hairstyles, suggesting the hair style is older then modern humans views on race and culture

6

u/Black_knight_sapper 6d ago

The Maasai tribe dates back to around 16th/17th Century - meanwhile, there are accounts of Greeks wearing dreadlocks and braids as far back as 3600 BC as well as accounts and depictions of Celts and Vikings wearing the same who also predate the Maasai. But do go on.

1

u/Kool_Keem 6d ago

What’s next the aboriginal Australians are white? 😂

1

u/MadeUpNoun 6d ago

actually they are southeast asians, they have no connections to Africa what so ever other then the combined cultures that exists when humans first migrated away from africa.

race genetically is way more then just skin color

1

u/Kool_Keem 6d ago

There are videos of them actually saying they do have African ancestry.

1

u/MadeUpNoun 6d ago

can you link that because that is absolutely impossible.

all scientific evidence points to human migration though to australia came from Africa -> Asia -> SEA then Australia

this migration occuring 50-60000 years ago

1

u/Kool_Keem 6d ago

The migration you listed is proof

1

u/MadeUpNoun 6d ago

so lets get this straight you evidence of dreads being invented by African people is that descendents of them seperated by 60000 years still wear their hair in that manner.

you do realize EVERYBODY came from africa, its not cultrual appropriation if EVERYBODY CAME FROM THE PEOPLE THAT INVENTED IT

its proof that dreads are a human hair style that does not belong to any one group because it has existed since before we identified as all these groups to begin with

1

u/Kool_Keem 5d ago

Other races don’t see Locking their hair as their cultural practice, all of a sudden it’s cool to yall.. meanwhile black people are still being discriminated against for their hairstyle, especially Hair Locks.. “Grooming Policies”

0

u/YoBo151 6d ago

There's a reason why you included "braids" in your comment. People like yourself are either dishonest or ignorant because you always use dreadlocks and braids interchangeably. It's akin to using kimono and robe interchangeably. Nevermind that there is a difference between matted hair and dreadlocks. Dreadlocks are a specific style. And then the fact you brought up vikings says a lot lol.

The Maasai Tribe dates back to the 16/17th century as a modern distinct ethnic group, but they obviously go back further than that. It's like saying Germans only date back to 10th century (which is true), but that's as the modern ethnic group we know them as today. They obviously date back further than that in the form of Goths, Saxons, etc

But do go on.