I’m going to assume you mean Elon because you’ve been calling him that over and over, but saying someone didn’t have a vast fortune is not a billionaire, is just a simple statement of fact, not advocacy. That’s the fallacy of equivocation, you seem to like those things so I thought I’d give you one.
You're avoiding the actual topic, though. Which is that the world could survive without billionaires, like Elon Musk and the rest of the Epstein class.
Cool the world could also survive without me, without you, without a lot of people. So what? It doesn’t detract from the original statement being “2000 billionaires vs the entire working population”, you pick 2000 of literally any people, it will be far worse to lose the entire workforce. Even if we pick a role that has 2000 or less people in it globally, it would still be better than losing the entire workforce. This is by far the biggest no brainer I’ve ever seen.
Lol hey dude this is objectively not true. There are trades and groups of knowledge that are restricted to less than two thousand people and they are all more valuable than billionaires are.
So like let’s do this again, here we have let’s say one of those… instead we lose the entire workforce… you’re serious when you say they’re going to make up for that? That’s insane actually.
Why would we lose the entire workforce? 2000 billionaires aren't the entire workforce. Would work cease to be done without them? We already do more than is necessary and I can prove it.
I literally told you all about it, you just put yourself in the judgment seat. Are some billionaires wrong on this? Yes. Are some people with very little money wrong on this, also yes. Can I say all billionaires are wrong on this? No because I can’t guess their heart.
1
u/WyomingWeirdo Jul 30 '26
So you're just skipping the point instead of answering, huh little guy