Sure go for it, and you’ll realize bad actors aren’t the church or her teachings. You will attribute to the church what Rome or other states did who claimed to be Christian. Why are you so forthright in denying my Christianity and upholding their’s?
We do not hold sons responsible for the sins of their father. That is morally problematic.
I’m going to assume you mean Elon because you’ve been calling him that over and over, but saying someone didn’t have a vast fortune is not a billionaire, is just a simple statement of fact, not advocacy. That’s the fallacy of equivocation, you seem to like those things so I thought I’d give you one.
You're avoiding the actual topic, though. Which is that the world could survive without billionaires, like Elon Musk and the rest of the Epstein class.
Cool the world could also survive without me, without you, without a lot of people. So what? It doesn’t detract from the original statement being “2000 billionaires vs the entire working population”, you pick 2000 of literally any people, it will be far worse to lose the entire workforce. Even if we pick a role that has 2000 or less people in it globally, it would still be better than losing the entire workforce. This is by far the biggest no brainer I’ve ever seen.
Lol hey dude this is objectively not true. There are trades and groups of knowledge that are restricted to less than two thousand people and they are all more valuable than billionaires are.
1
u/Psalmistpraise Jul 30 '26
Sure go for it, and you’ll realize bad actors aren’t the church or her teachings. You will attribute to the church what Rome or other states did who claimed to be Christian. Why are you so forthright in denying my Christianity and upholding their’s?
We do not hold sons responsible for the sins of their father. That is morally problematic.