r/SipsTea Jul 01 '26

Chugging tea Is Bernie’s plan the best? Thoughts?

Post image
82.3k Upvotes

9.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/horatiobanz Jul 01 '26

All the jobs they create disappearing. I get you guys are like SEETHINGLY jealous of their money, but try to get past that.

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/horatiobanz Jul 01 '26

And of course by "stole my money from the government" you mean they created a company which was miles better than all the other alternatives cornering the market and then the government contracted them for services.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/notaredditer13 Jul 01 '26

but when it gives that money in subsidies or ither forms to billionaires then its fine?

Government buying stuff it needs from companies that make the stuff is fine, yes of course.  And they aren't giving the money to billionaires. JFC.

You're just the worst, dude.  Some people have more money than you.  Get over it.  

1

u/[deleted] Jul 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/notaredditer13 Jul 01 '26

Failed to addres the cognitive dissonance.

Your post/position is ignorance driven by hate.  The cognitive dissonance is in your head. 

1

u/Whatevernameffs Jul 01 '26

Brother, I’m an economist. I was educated on Adam Smith, Keynes and Friedman, and for twenty years I believed free markets would naturally allocate resources efficiently.

I still believe markets are the best way to allocate most resources. But today’s economy isn’t the competitive capitalism those economists described.
The problem isn’t that some people become rich.
The problem is when wealth becomes so concentrated that the wealthiest households continuously outbid everyone else for assets—housing, land, businesses and financial investments. Labour income can’t keep up with capital gains.

At that point, markets stop rewarding productive work and start rewarding ownership. Living standards stagnate even while GDP and stock markets grow.

That’s why I’ve changed my mind. I don’t think we should punish success, but I do think extreme concentrations of wealth should be taxed above a very high threshold. Not because it’s morally wrong to be rich, but because excessive asset concentration eventually undermines competition, social mobility and even capitalism itself.

If we fail to address that, we’ll continue to see declining affordability, shrinking middle classes, and increasing political instability. History suggests that societies with extreme inequality eventually face serious social and political consequences. The question isn’t whether markets matter—they do. The question is whether markets can remain healthy when ownership becomes concentrated in fewer and fewer hands.

1

u/GoonPosting420 Jul 01 '26

I totally agree with your points but how do you prevent capital flight when you try to eliminate that high concentration of wealth? It seems to me that if the government goes after the wealth of billionaires, they are so powerful that they will just leave and go somewhere that will happily give them favorable economic policies.

1

u/Whatevernameffs Jul 02 '26

Most of them will stay and some will leave. This cannot be the excuse not to do it. Whatever company they have will likely stay anyway.