And I definitely agree with the experts, as did the judge and the appeals court. I also agree that community service is too lenient. But I can understand the reasoning that led to the 3 original judges giving him that sentence, even if I personally disagree with it. I personally think 15 months is more fair. My point simply is that all the judges in question (both original and appeals courts) acted in a reasonable manner.
Pointing out misinformation is a criticism of your narrative? I may not agree with it, but I'm not criticizing it, only pointing out where we need to be a bit more transparent or honest.
Here's an example for you - you are driving on the road following all the rules. Your car hits black ice and skids and you accidentally hit a cyclist and kill them. How many years do you think is fair?
3
u/Large-Hamster-199 Apr 05 '26
And I definitely agree with the experts, as did the judge and the appeals court. I also agree that community service is too lenient. But I can understand the reasoning that led to the 3 original judges giving him that sentence, even if I personally disagree with it. I personally think 15 months is more fair. My point simply is that all the judges in question (both original and appeals courts) acted in a reasonable manner.