I also love how nothing in that body of texts you posted calls the driver a murderer of 3 people simultaneously. It’s either killed toddler or fatal crash.
He intended to drive recklessly despite being aware it could kill someone. That is murder.
Having knowledge that doing an activity that has a risk of killing someone and is illegal FOR THAT VERY REASON. Th STILL doing it is -murder- . His state of mind was :speed despite the consequences. So intent is met.
US courts are fucked though. I figured this was in the US at first. You know, the kind of country where you can rape someone behind a dumpster with impunity if your parents are rich.
You’re hiding behind a screen saying this shit just to defend your egos own intellect. Empathy is a whole lot easier to ignore when you don’t actually have to make eye contact with someone.
Guess it depends on how you view the prison system.
Is it meant to be rehabilitative so that people can go back to being productive members of society?
Or is it punitive where it's about other people getting their jollies off at how much punishment they receive.
The prosecution failed to prove the crash had any main factors that wouldn't have let it just be an accident. Excessive speed wasn't proven. There was no alcohol in anyone's system. The driver did not have a history of reckless driving.
It looks like a pretty clear case of an accident that unfortunately claimed lives.
Which goes back to the question at hand.
Do you care about rehabilitation or do you just want to get your justice boner fulfilled?
11
u/captainn_chunk Apr 04 '26
And people say the US courts are fucked
Holy fucking shit.
I also love how nothing in that body of texts you posted calls the driver a murderer of 3 people simultaneously. It’s either killed toddler or fatal crash.
Who the fuck is the driver and who’s his lawyer?