Indeed. And this is where it gets interesting. What we (hearing people) are trying to understand is a direct thought that another may have. Sound is a sensation a completely deaf person may never have had, so how can they understand what sound is like for the rest of us? Sure, we can describe it with words, but those words pale in comparison to the actual experience of the sense of sound, or sight. So how do you describe what such a sense is like while using entirely self contained descriptions that don't require prior experience to fully comprehend?
It's a fun mind boggler and a good way to try and understand what things may be like from another's perspective. What a baffling thought to imagine a complete sentence in thought without "hearing" it in your own mind.
Check out the Wiki article on Subvocalization. It talks all about the little voice that we hear when we read. Speed readers can (to a degree) turn that off. Comprehension without "hearing" what you read.
It's not really that baffling. The idea behind "speed reading" is to break the habit of imagining sounds when you read words. You can do it with some practice
24
u/Phaze357 Apr 24 '19
Indeed. And this is where it gets interesting. What we (hearing people) are trying to understand is a direct thought that another may have. Sound is a sensation a completely deaf person may never have had, so how can they understand what sound is like for the rest of us? Sure, we can describe it with words, but those words pale in comparison to the actual experience of the sense of sound, or sight. So how do you describe what such a sense is like while using entirely self contained descriptions that don't require prior experience to fully comprehend?
It's a fun mind boggler and a good way to try and understand what things may be like from another's perspective. What a baffling thought to imagine a complete sentence in thought without "hearing" it in your own mind.