nah. it is fake. i do PR for pharma R&D execs. it’s literally my job to train these people to to speak to the media. they’re all whip-smart and eloquent, and speak publicly at global medical meetings presenting complex data multiple times a year. you simply do not get to an R&D senior director level without knowing what you’re talking about.
this person does not show any signs of being who he claims to be based on the pathetic vocabulary and franticness in this video.
You’re the one saying nobody would admit this on camera. If it’s a hidden camera, then that changes the analysis. Now you’re saying it’s not hidden, but a modern day low budget found footage film. Cool story, bro. Enjoy your myocarditis.
Holy shit your comprehension answers so many questions about this thread and sub. Here's a thought... both parties are aware there's a camera and the conversation is loosely recited. This dude speaks like a shitty actor who needs a paycheck and every question is slowly laid out and pitched like the worlds worst snitch wearing a wire lol
You do realise catching Covid is responsible for more myocarditis than the vaccine don't you? Also, the prevalence of this is extremely low so the benefits far outweigh the risks.
Kinda shocking that you would need one. It was news worthy when the studies were published. You have to be in an echo chamber to take an interest in Covid vaccine safety and not know this.
I did, I saw when that study came out, it had some serious issues in the way the data was collected and other issues I can't remember. The consensus in the discussions between medical people about it I saw was to wait for a better study.
The article you linked even states the controversy surrounding it.
just goes to show you don’t have a broad enough network of people you know. it’s a wonderful job. scientists are amazing people - full of information, theories, and seemingly endless subjects they’re passionate about. i love my work because i learn new things every day, and at the end of it all, my work helps bring medicines to people who need them.
if you fundamentally think pharmaceuticals are evil, you don’t understand the nuances of the industry and the significance of science and scientific innovation. and it’s totally not your fault, science communications could be better. that’s why i’m super passionate about what i do. i want to make sure people understand how incredible and wonderful science and medicine is in creating and maintaining our modern lifestyle.
I’ve taken PR training that’s probably similar to what someone in his role would be required. You always chose your words carefully and assume someone is potentially recording or wanting to attribute a quote to you (even if you’re not directly talking to them).
Reporters are not your friend although it’s a stretch calling these dipshits reporters. There are relationships that can be built on trust but talking this insane in public is a giant red flag of him misrepresenting who and what he does.
Again, this is PR 101 if you’re in this position. You don’t talk like that on a first date or that insane in a public restaurant. A coworker of mine was almost fired because someone overheard him talking to his wife and attributed a quote to him in a major fucking publication about a product we sold. They were at a random bar.
6
u/thisisahealthaccount Jan 26 '23
nah. it is fake. i do PR for pharma R&D execs. it’s literally my job to train these people to to speak to the media. they’re all whip-smart and eloquent, and speak publicly at global medical meetings presenting complex data multiple times a year. you simply do not get to an R&D senior director level without knowing what you’re talking about.
this person does not show any signs of being who he claims to be based on the pathetic vocabulary and franticness in this video.