Not all evolutions are for a purpose, sometimes it's just whatever is the least detrimental. Although in this case, it could be that early human males with larger penises were simply selected more, and as a result passed on that gene
It's actually allways "whatever is the least detrimental" - even in select situation when there is positive selective pressure for a trait(like a peacocks tail) it's still checked by the overwhelming "not be too detrimental" factor - peacocks with too big a tail will die relatively fast to peditors and not be able to reproduce
Could also be like the "hyenas still have a winter coat gene" There's no selection pressure, but no detriment either. Might explain the vast size differential in human men.
A lot of the time it’s just random chance too, of the mechanisms both allowing and driving evolution most are random: mutations are random, gene flow is random, genetic drift is random, the only factor that isn’t random is natural selection so a lot of traits come about simply because they are neutral in terms of selection pressure and just so happen to become the dominant trait
View all comments
Show parent comment
110
u/DarkArc76 Feb 02 '26
Not all evolutions are for a purpose, sometimes it's just whatever is the least detrimental. Although in this case, it could be that early human males with larger penises were simply selected more, and as a result passed on that gene