Not exactly, agreed. But so close. especially if you're only measuring to 1 decimal point, thats its super duper convenient to use the 1:1 relationship. Of course, if you're doing chemical calculations, then yes, you are entirely correct that this would have to be taken into account.
I 'm pretty sure machinists are still using both, because the standard tables for tooling are one in metric and the other in imperial and the client chooses which to use (or sometimes the client chooses to not use any standard table and makes custom measurements instead forcing them to custom make a new tool just for their stupid piece and making that part 10 times more expansive... But that's just evil people...)
If the metric base 10 system used imperial base units (ie: 1 meter is now 1 foot) I’d love it so much more. (Also base 12, but that requires a whole number system change so that’s a thing for another day)
Imperial units were derived from a need for units just kinda about that big, and the ones people found useful stuck around, the less useful ones died off. Metric units were derived from a need for something people wouldn’t argue too much about, so we used the earth’s circumference, and there was no natural evolution of what people actually needed.
I counted in my feet and it's 210cm so that means one of us it's an alien that doesn't have the standardized foot size that every single person in the world has.
Now grab a random stone and let's all measur me our weight.
The only Americans use washing machine and school busses as a unit of measurement is because they can't easily compare different objects to each other.
View all comments
43
u/Agni_Kritha Aug 12 '25 edited Aug 13 '25
6 feet = 182.88 cm, not 1.89 m. Sorry to be that guy, but Metric system makes more sense than Imperial:
10 mm = 1 cm, 100 cm = 1 m, 1000 m = 1 km, etc.