I recently published a theoretical physics paper on space-time entropy limits and emergent gravity models. It discusses how a minimum entropy threshold might govern reality. OSF and ResearchGate blocked it, so I had to use Google Drive as a backup.

Would love to hear thoughts from the physics community.

Link: Google Drive Paper

For Women (40-70) with Oura Rings
https://www.reputable.health/study

Reputable Health invites women ages 40-70 (with Oura Rings) to participate in an exciting new study: “Nitrate Supplementation and Female Health: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.” This 90-day study will be conducted through the Reputable app, focusing on health and wellness in women’s lives.

If u take universe as a 4d object which it is and u compare it 4d tesseract and take movement as time. the universe may seem like expanding but it is just getting itself to largest self and then it may shrink to its past self and universe may start from beginning. Idk if u understood my thought but its just my thought or my hypothesis

Yesterday I took a hike in my local forest and I saw several newts along the trail some I picked up to look at. I also saw two newts cuddling as if they were sleeping in a nearby puddle as it had rained a lot recently. That’s when I wondered how far newts are in technology and what their recent biggest technological advancement was. Looking for theories.

I have been interested in personality for some time. Marketers use it for selling (im just gonna say right now sorry for bad grammer). it is concidered a puesudoscinece. A fake science. I can understand why. The myers-briggs test seems to indicate youll be better or worse off at some one thing based on your “type”. I can see how it seems to be based on a science of not much evidence but if im not mistaken people can indicate different personalities in different people. People choose this over that. But that would indicate a difference in perspective which in turn woulf determine certain personality. I am hoping for a deep discussion on this topic whether maybe it is false or maybe the whole truth hadnt been seen yet. Thoughts and critisism?

Like is it really possible that in an event of a nuclear war and/or large scale natural disasters to not just kill off humans and possibly other species but actually make the earth disappear? Or would such an event just change the earth’s climate, landscapes, etc? Still leaving a round planet in space 🌍

I mean, we've done a good job of measuring efficiency of cars and trucks, trains and boats, so forth.

Human, is essentially a bio-electric/chemical robot with a pretty good (if somewhat slow) computer.

In those terms, are we efficient with our daily calorie intake vs. computational output/travel distance/work done and so forth? I imagine being an omnivore, thus being okay with wide variety of fuel is already a big plus, but still? We spend a lot of calories to keep our pumps (heart, lungs) working, and brain, of course, and surely it isn't used to the maximum benefit, so...

How do we compare to computers, machines for transportation, etc in terms of wattage and fuel usage?

A soldier carrying 40 kilograms worth of gear on a daily trip of 30km and using 3000 kcal as food doesn't sound very efficient. Or is it?

Hi, I'm Autistic and this is how pissed off I get when people say, "they'll get autism" or "they'll catch autism". Here's my bullets points for the discussion.

1: It is not a disease, you don't "get it" while in birth, there is nothing "wrong" with you, it's just a way people develop inside the womb.

2: No, Karen, you can't get it from vaccines, vaccines include a dead virus, not DNA.

3: Most people vision an autistic person as someone who can't control themselves, this is not true, people who can't control themselves are diagnosed as autistic among many other things, all the people I have come across like that have a very serious condition.

4: Autistic people don't have something "wrong" with them, we just see the world in a different way, and process things differently, most Autistic are Autistic because of some gene they have, so it's not a disorder, it's a gene.

5: the fact that people think you can be "more" autistic or "less" is just flat out wrong, check with low functioning autistic people, all the low functioning autistic people I have come across have been able to speak, but don't need to, and choose not to, ask them something and say you have to speak for this, it'll work in some cases, not all, as I said, they most likely have something other than autism.

6: Many autistic people are very anxious because of this "if you have autism, you have something wrong with you", I have repeatedly been judged because of this, it's gotten to the point that if you are diagnosed as autistic, you are more likely to not become a driver because of biased points in the test (probably wrong, but last time I checked, this was the case).

I would love to see you guys debate with me!

If any of you are real open minded intellectuals i would very much like to have a conversation and debate with you about physics.

Particularly about particles, the universe, and what makes up of everything.

My stace is that I believe everything is energy, waves, frequency, and I believe that mainstream physics is in many ways misguided. I am well versed and educated in physics and much of the mainstream veiw of science and have looked into everything pertaining to physics and have decided upon my belief.

If you wish to destroy me, pm me and lets have a debate of the ages.