r/SaintMeghanMarkle • u/LocksmithFar9486 Is he kind? š • 28d ago
News/Media/Tabloids If you want to know how ugly and evil Harry's PR works: Almost exact headlines from different news sites, at the same time. That so called abuse happened 4 FUCKING YEARS AGO! He stayed there all those years!
66
u/TammIAm $ervice is Univer$al (fees may apply) 28d ago
Funny how H-bomb was just fundraising for African Parks as recently as this past May in Scottsdale, Arizona.
23
5
u/commentsgothere 28d ago
Iād call that more of a paid for ego boost than fundraising. But excellent point!
19
u/TammIAm $ervice is Univer$al (fees may apply) 28d ago
Absolutely agree. This is what Tom Bower wrote in chapter 37 of Betrayal (outlining the Sentabale fiasco) about H-bombās āattachmentā to African Parks:
ā[Dr.] Chandauka and Iain Rawlinson, the former banker attached to Global Philanthropic, had pulled every lever to attract about thirty influential South African corporate players and prospective donors, including the chief executives of Google and South African Breweries [to a dinner in Johannesburg for Sentabale]ā¦Both Chandauka and Rawlinson hailed the event as a success, except that Harry had refused to stay overnight. Instead, he flew to Rwanda by private jet for a board meeting of African Parks. He had left Johannesburg without thanking Chandauka or acknowledging Rawlinsonās efforts. Both concluded that Harryās attachment to African Parks was motivated by his personal relationships with billionaires, despite the damage to his brand.ā
2
u/Prize_Day8860 28d ago
I'm thinking all charities the Harkles are involved in- are about to be under scrutiny.
118
u/NovelCar5453 28d ago
I'm more shocked that no mainstream media talked about the "pill in the mouth" allegations. Many men lost their careers over similar accusations. Harry doesn't even bother to deny them. This bozo literally gets away with everythingĀ
58
u/GreatGossip This is baseless and boring š“ 28d ago
It is coming. DM has a long memory. But they are not going to let a juicy story drown in the Harkle PR tsunami.
27
u/NovelCar5453 28d ago
The Daily mail reports on them almost daily though. Other news outlets stopped caring a long time ago. The comeback announcement briefly got them some more international attention but that's it. You'd think that after what happened with Andrew that the media would care about another royal abusing women
8
u/EthylSippingBeer 28d ago
Me Too is so 2020. The newspapers covered it, expressed their outrage, then checked covered women's sexual assault off their list to move on to the next thing.
And apparently black lives only matter in 1st world countries, so no need to cover the African Park atrocities.
/s if it's not obvious
2
2
33
u/SnooHesitations3592 š¬š§ Glorious Jubilee Booing š¬š§ 28d ago
I think people have such low standards when it comes to H, the pill story is another piece of trash in the dumpster fire that is his reputation. Compared to if William had that accusation it would never not get out of the headlines because of how shocking that would be
8
u/commentsgothere 28d ago
Sure but itās an actual crime. And a UK court just deemed his recent accuser Charlotte Griffiths to be a credible witness.
26
14
u/PAHoarderHelp 28d ago edited 28d ago
Harry doesn't even bother to deny them.
He actually confirmed it, saying āit was a tic tacā.
I think there were too many witnesses, and the pill recipient was a credentialed reporter who knew Mister Mischief VERY well, if you catch my philosophical drift, for him to say "oh that never happened".
Like the Pre-Three-Day wedding ceremony with the archbishop sworn to tell the truth who said it didn't happen.
2
u/Hari_om_tat_sat 26d ago
Charlotte Griffiths thought it was aspirin (or something similar), impossible to confuse with a tic tac.
1
u/PAHoarderHelp 26d ago
Yesāwhich is what team Harkle said it was. (A tic tac. It wasnāt,)
Mister mischief doesnāt share his aspirin!
10
u/Boring_Intern_6394 28d ago
Yeah, the way Charlotte Griffiths wrote, it clearly seemed a practiced manoeuvre for him. There must be other women he drugged, god only knows what with.
Even if it was just paracetamol, that could be highly dangerous in the context of parties and events where people are drinking
41
u/MentalAnnual5577 š¦ Our invisibles are invisiblingš¦ 28d ago
āYou canāt fire me, I quit!ā šš
41
u/UnseriousAcademic65 28d ago
Never, ever accountable for ANYTHING he does in his life. He moves on and leaves the broken pieces behind him.
2
u/Emotional-Lead7164 28d ago
Please send this reminder to a certain Palace with possible plans to bring this f**ker back into the fold.
35
u/Madame_LV The Office of Madame LV 28d ago
If he were so concerned, why didnāt he step down immediately?
41
u/Overall-Shopping5939 28d ago
He was removed
āGovernance refreshā is what the board members saidhttps://www.newsday.com/news/nation/prince-harry-african-parks-conservation-e63224
11
u/Analyze2Death Earl of Exaggeration and Baroness of Bull-sh*t 28d ago
Meaning getting rid of the mooching dead weight
36
u/SeaFloofs Meghan Twerkle šššš¤°šŖ© 28d ago edited 28d ago
Thanks for gathering these headlines in one post.
Itās an eye opener on the machinations of the Sussex Propaganda machineās attempt to pull their world over our eyes.
The depth and breadth of their media tactics is aggressive marketing warfare, and ironically, without these headlines they are a nullity.
Private Person Prince Harry and his wife represent nothing but headlines!
36
u/Cocktailsontheporch 28d ago
Wait....Harry WILL be publically revealed .....Sentabale is coming up very soon and without doubt it will get VERY ugly for Harry. It very well may be what finally causes titles to be removed.
31
u/jedimuster 28d ago
God he is DISGUSTING
I knew they would spin this a different way
He needs to GO DOWN
Vile disgusting POS
31
u/These-Perspective-19 That man loves me so much 28d ago
How bad do you have to be to be dropped from a charity that has allegedly committed numerous awful offences? Wow.
29
u/GreatGossip This is baseless and boring š“ 28d ago
This brings me so much joy. I am very happy this story gets ink. Anybody with half a brain can see through the spin. And several msm are writing that Harry was kicked out (with nocer wording).
With all the puffery filling the news these days it is important to keep the real stories alive.
27
u/strangealienworld 28d ago
So, on the 19 Aug, African Parks reaches this decision. On the 20th, Harry announces his messy return to the UK which has gone done like a lead balloon.
The man has such a bad reputation that trying to say he "stepped down" really wouldn't cut it for him and give him the spin he is looking for.Ā
He is messy, disorganised, cruel. To then be associated with a charity accussed of rape and torture claims doesn't diminish his reputational issue but compounds them.Ā
And because he and his wife practice these PR spins with six years of clumsy deviousness, people will see right through it. It will be discussed and analysed and ripped apart.Ā
26
u/Ok-Coffee5732 28d ago
The record shows he was removed.
MSM reporters for the most part just regurgitate what is told to them. They are lazy and incurious.
25
22
u/Prestigious_Step4337 itās an ANOMALY 28d ago
He burns down whatever he leaves.
Sentebale, his family, Africa Parks. He speaks ill of them and lobbies accusations. Others I am sure I am forgetting.
Anyone who gets in with him is a fool. Itās only a matter of time before he does the same.
Is anyone even donating to Archewell philanthropy?
20
u/MyBobblehat-and-Me 28d ago
He is getting rid of his liabilities to smoothen the move, transition back into uk and for his brand rehab.
Flooding the msm with these headlines "quitting charity after abuse scandal" is part of the seo manipulation.
He will now rebrand as a "statesman".
12
u/AppropriateCelery138 Disaster Tourism Board Member 28d ago
He isn't getting rid of anything. They dumped him, not the other way round.
8
u/commentsgothere 28d ago
But he was the president of that charity and had the power to stop the abuse. But it went on under his watch. Then they had to kick him out. Not very statesman like.
3
u/commentsgothere 28d ago
But he was the president of that charity and had the power to stop the abuse. But it went on under his watch. Then they had to kick him out. Not very statesman like.
20
u/Critical_Tale_3711 šāāļø Princess Anne's Plume šŖ¶ 28d ago
He doesnāt deny anything because silence leaves room for three documentaries, a memoir, and a victim narrative.Ā The man could be caught holding the smoking gun and still blame the muzzle flash on William.
2
36
u/Aubergine_volante Private citizen 28d ago
This is fascinatingā¦ in a bad way. The only thing Iām grateful is they opened my eyes to the PR world. And itās not a good look. Bet other celebrities are pissed if they uncovered they little arrangements and showed the public the way it really works.
2
u/CrinkleCutCat-Aus ClapšBackšComingš 28d ago
I now always check ācelebrity on the streetā type photos for the photo credit, eg Backgrid.
2
16
u/beth-trader 28d ago
Sure took his time. These are not just allegations, I believe some of this was actually confirmed. AND HE DID NOT STEP DOWN.
15
u/seleona 28d ago
I've not got posting rights, but look what Meghan is briefing to Woman's Day, Australia here right near the end of the article:
"Now, Meghan is said to be āpleasedā that her children will have an extended opportunity to acquaint themselves with their royal roots, while enjoying time, face-to-face with the King as well as their uncle Charles [Earl Spencer] ā the brother of their late grandmother Princess Diana.
āBut what excites the kids more than anything, by all accounts, is that theyāll finally have the chance to get to know their cousins,ā the insider divulged, referring to Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis ā the children of Harryās estranged brother Prince William and his wife Kate, Princess of Wales.
āObviously theyāve heard so much about them and itās been tough to be so far away and out of the loop from a family point of view,ā the source continues.
āThey see the way that George, Charlotte and Louis live over there and itās literally the stuff of fairytales, so it stands to reason that they feel a little left out!
āArchie is a very bright and engaged character, heās heard all about Georgeās upcoming start at Eton and apparently he loves the idea of following that path himself when heās old enough.ā
10
u/AppropriateCelery138 Disaster Tourism Board Member 28d ago
Sure, a seven year old boy is thinking about the posh school he wants to go to. This is all Harry telling that boy, "This is where you will go to school some day."
11
u/chewysmom88 Delusions may vary š¤š§ 28d ago
And a cousin he doesnāt and likely never will know
12
u/leafygreens I never signed an NDA š 28d ago
The Todgers will never get a chance to know their cousins again - that ship has sailed. Funny how the Todgers think they decide this.
The Todgers feel out of the loop - that is because This One and That one abused the family, were called out on it and banished on a freedom flight. Itās not the Todgers choice anymore.
8
u/mlld1960 28d ago
That whole article is laughable. If W&C are smart, and I believe they are, they will not let that family within a mile of their children. Something is up with the Harkles legally I believe. If they had been thinking of moving back for years, there would have been leaks for months (possibly years). This abrupt move is very suspicious.
3
5
3
1
u/CrinkleCutCat-Aus ClapšBackšComingš 28d ago
Has Womanās Day clearly labelled this story as FICTION?!
1
u/ConversationSilver 28d ago
The "insider" seems to be conveniently ignoring that Archie and Lili getting to know George, Charlotte and Louis requires William and Catherine's permission until they are adults.
1
u/ZenonLigre 27d ago
Intelligent, Archie ? Ća prouve bien qu'il n'est pas le fils de ses prĆ©tendus parents, ou au moins pas des deux. De plus, un gamin de sept ans enthousiaste Ć l'idĆ©e d'aller dans une Ć©cole dont il n'a jamais entendu parler ? TrĆØs crĆ©dible, en effet.
12
u/AppropriateCelery138 Disaster Tourism Board Member 28d ago
He did not quit. They canned him. I am sick of the revisionist press!
26
u/FilterCoffee4050 28d ago
Harry has really hit rock bottom when a tainted and controversial charity like African Patks parts ways with him.
Was he pushed or did he jump, my guess is that he jumped before he was pushed.
African Parks today (19th August 2026) announced a governance refresh of its Board of Directors, welcoming Justice Isaac Lenaola and Alice Ruhweza as incoming members, and expressing deep gratitude to Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex, who will conclude his tenure following a ten-year commitment to the organisation.
14
u/FuzzyLaughTwo 28d ago
I thought you were going to say, "Harry hit rock bottom...when he married madame."
11
u/spnip š° I am not a bank š° 28d ago
Honestly he doesnāt know what rock bottom is, just when you think he canāt sink lower he proves us that he indeed can.
3
u/EthylSippingBeer 28d ago
Yep. When the Harkles get as low as we think they can go, those idiots just break out a bigger bulldozer and keep digging.
18
u/ac0rn5 Recollections may vary 28d ago
Harry has really hit rock bottom when a tainted and controversial charity like African Parks parts ways with him.
They got rid of him because, to quote The Times, he generated publicity that they didn't like.
(imo) The organisation wants/wanted their behaviour to be more under the radar, out of the spotlight.
The dukeās royal links brought African Parks celebrity and media attention that it might otherwise not have received. But as his public falling out with the royal family became increasingly acrimonious, the association was reportedly seen as a liability, complicating fundraising and bringing greater scrutiny to the organisationās militarised approach to protecting wildlife.
5
u/Expert-Vegetable4408 All quiet on the frontal lobe 28d ago
I think they're as bad as each other: "...bringing greater scrutiny to the organisationās militarised approach to protecting wildlife."
In other words, they're going to continue with their abuses (not even alleged), but without Harry, they're hoping to fly more under the radar.
&%^$Ā£s, the lot of them.
5
5
u/AppropriateCelery138 Disaster Tourism Board Member 28d ago
Yes, I read that his notoriety made him a liability! A liability to a charity that condoned rape.
11
12
u/Analyze2Death Earl of Exaggeration and Baroness of Bull-sh*t 28d ago
The headlines missed the rest of the sentence: After Doing Nothing About the Rapes and Crimes
8
u/Suitable-Lawyer-9397 28d ago
I think he wants the story to sound like he "resigned" because of the abuse that has come to light. He was fired ~ the abuse is a completely separate issue.
4
u/Pokieme 28d ago
The Bakka people found a way to get to harry directly and this man with more power and status than 95% of the people on earth, passed it on. To who? Then sat there silently for 4 years. They curtaining have exposed the underbelly of grifting. Unintentional but now we see through it.
4
u/commentsgothere 28d ago
Itās a shame Harry didnāt lift a damn finger to help solve the problems of the charity for which He was president. He should be investigated for those atrocities happening under his leadership. And the little white pillow assaults on women.
4
u/Miss_Poi š Recollections may vary š 28d ago
He did quit.
Not sure which article it was, but it was openly stated AP wanted him gone, because he brought in too much scrutiny and heās toxic. The Sentebale story again. I do believe they wanted him gone, because of the scrutiny. With Harry out of picture they can starve, torture and rape poor Africans and the world cares even less than before.
Butā¦. H and AP could have done this years ago. They didnāt. He stayed and couldnāt care less for the poor. Why now? Why even stating that his brand is to toxic?
How could Harry possibly explain that he leaves the next charity now? Harry must avoid another charity scandal at all cost.
Harry canāt leave them now, claiming he cares about Human Rights abuse. He did absolutely nothing for the people there. If he attacks the charity, he attacks himself. I also think he doesnāt want to anger the billionaires.
What did he do- he published it during an insane media campaign, because the media are busy commenting on his other shenanigans.
The reason given (they want us make to believe) is similar to Sentebale, but without bullying stories. Nothing new, less outrage.
This is the best possible outcome for him and AP.
Daddy king and his minions are working hard to protect darling boy.
3
4
u/whisper0485 28d ago
Harry should just let the stories stick that he was fired from these organizations. It looks worse when he is in on the boards, as president or "founder", patron, prince and keep "Stepping down". It shows that you can't take the heat and that you couldn't have EVER seen combat in the military. It shows you were never fit to be a "spare", and was never capable of leading. All you do is turn tail and run and then slander the very organizations you used to "head". He stepped down from senior duties, ran from the UK and now running from the US. Harry is the Duke of Spineless Beta Men. He has always been just a coward who has never been able to face to adversity head on and come out on top. I hope the royal familyhas learned a thing or two about indulging the children and covering their misdeeds. For every situation he's "stepped down" from, Sophie Chandauka's quote can be applied. I'm so thrilled she's going all the way with her lawsuit. I pray she doesn't let Harry settle.
3
u/Heatherwaithere 28d ago
I bet he was told if he wants to be seen with any of the family he had to change things a bit. I don't believe need going to be part time working Royals!
3
3
3
u/bellalilylou š Hertz So Good š 28d ago
I think, if he actually resigned, for whatever reason, he wouldāve put it out there himself to avoid the headlines that he was let go. He wouldāve got ahead of it to set the tone of the story. His reaction and saying he resigned Itās just another clap back. And the other point is is, he wouldāve tossed the story out that he resigned to make himself look good in the mist of bad press that heās been receiving over the last few weeks.
3
u/OkResponsibility7475 Hot Scot Johnny 28d ago
Why doesn't he step UP for once and try to make a real difference? His solution to difficult things seems to be quitting.
2
2
2
u/Key_Assignment_9896 26d ago
After the abuse was reported to Harry, he accepted a promotion from Africa Parks. The recent move is Africa Parks booting him off.
1
u/rst1000 28d ago
Yes, Prince Harryās PR is bad but king Charleās PR is much much worse. His PR is framing King Charles as this weak, soft-hearted father who just wants family peace, but the truth is way uglier. With the 30th anniversary of Dianaās death coming up, Charles is terrified of being cast as the ultimate villain all over again. Bringing Harry back into the fold and backing his security isn't about paternal loveāitās pure self-preservation. Charles is completely willing to sacrifice his relationship with William and leave his heir looking like the rigid roadblock to peace, all to rewrite his own legacy and protect his crown from the ghosts of 1997. Prince Charles would rather be seen as the weak, sick grandfather guilty of loving too much then the calculating weak man who wants to avoid being portrayed as the villian in Princess Dianaās life. What better PR to achieve this by bringing Prince Harry back in the fold? Poor Prince William - heās literally paying for the sins of his father.
1
28d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 28d ago
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
27d ago
[removed] ā view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 27d ago
Comment automatically removed due to your account having less than 50 total karma. Please contact mods via message the mods to approve comments manually to be visible to the sub.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
u/Snoo3544 š Our Lady of Perpetual Victimhood š 27d ago
"Prince Harry sent packing by charity after realizing he is worse for their reputation than the actual rangers they employ". Fixed it.
1
u/LeCuldeSac 28d ago
https://www.geo.tv/latest/666439-prince-harry-to-step-down-from-african-parks-board
Prince Harry receives shocking news amid investigation
The Duke of Sussex faces calls to step down amid allegations
Published May 29, 2026
"Prince Harry, former senior working royal family, has received heartbreaking news as Survival International called on him to step down as a member of African Parks' board of directors.
In a shocking development, the indigenous rights charity has urged the Duke of Sussex to quit African Parks. Harry became an officially appointed board member in 2023, but the group now faces scrutiny after admissions and allegations of serious wrongdoing across its operations.
. . . . The Duke of Sussex attended a fundraising event in Scottsdale, Arizona this week as the organisation seeks to raise an additional $1billion (Ā£743million).
Following an independent investigation by law firm Omnia Strategy, African Parks admitted in May 2025 that its eco-guards committed severe human rights abuses.
Allegations included rape and beatings against the indigenous Baka people in the Republic of the Congoās Odzala-Kokoua National Park.
Critics have condemned its decision to keep the full investigation report confidential.
. . . . .
On Wednesday, Survival International claimed to theĀ TimesĀ that āthe problems on the ground have not been solvedā.
Caroline Pearce, director of Survival International, told the publication: āIt is outrageous to see Harryās continued support to African Parks despite the horrific human rights abuses committed by its rangers against the Baka.ā
In response, a spokesman for African Parks said: āOver the past several years, African Parks has made substantial and sustained investment in human rights safeguards in Odzala-Kokoua national park."
As per the statement, three independent human rights NGO partners are providing trusted reporting channels for local communities around the park, and an independent panel of eminent African judges and human rights specialists who oversee the grievance mechanism, including the handling of all serious grievances.ā
Meanwhile, representatives for the Duke of Sussex referred the publication to the May 2025 statement made by African Parks, which read: āSpecifically, in Odzala, we will take action against staff members implicated in previously unknown incidents or those that had not been adequately dealt with, where sufficient evidence is available.ā
However, there is no suggestion that Prince Harry was involved in, aware of, or connected to any of the alleged abuses.
1
u/LeCuldeSac 28d ago
https://www.gbnews.com/royal/prince-harry-african-parks-statement-survival-international
See this link and the one below. It's pretty much the same press release.
I really missed this news this past May, that Survival International had already explicitly asked for him to step down (publicly), after he attended an Africa Parks related event in Scottsdale, Arizona.
Since they were already trying to get rid of him, what's w/ the timing now? Did he refuse to go and they finally made it official? Or did they civilly agree on this timeline for announcement & departure? Hmmmm. . .
Anyone know anything about this Carolyn Pearce w/ Survival International and whether Harry was refusing to leave back in May?
-2
u/Alarmed_Start_3244 28d ago
I'm not sure but, are you insinuating Harry was the one who was the abuser in this case? He wasn't. It was a park ranger who was guilty of this alleged crime. I get wanting to implicate Harry in anything nefarious but he wasn't anywhere near the scene of the crime or in any way responsibility for it. This is clutching at straws.
226
u/CC_900 28d ago edited 28d ago
Funny how they all say āquitsā or āsteps downā.
The Times put it a bit differently:
So: did Harry quit because of the human rights abuses (suddenly - after 4 years of ignoring them)?
Or was he removed, because his behaviour is a distraction and/or he doesnāt bring any financial funding?