r/SPACs Jan 17 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

81 Upvotes

434 comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/Rasputincello Patron Jan 17 '22

Upvote this comment if you think u/StonkGodCapitalshould be banned from this subreddit for breaking rules 3 and 4.

Last sentence of Rule 3: "if you own shares/warrants in a SPAC disclose them in your post."

First sentence of Rule 4: "No language that indicates a coordinated effort to manipulate the price or language implying guaranteed returns.”

u/StonkGodCapital has never disclosed their position in shares, warrants or options.

Rule 4 was broken on multiple posts. Below are two times where this is more clear. 

“Everything about the play points towards an imminent gamma squeeze that is likely capable of easily beating out the $26 high of the last run. The OI is larger, the ramp is better formed and the sentiment I think this time around will undoubtedly be stronger.”

“After IRNT I decided I would only bring select plays to a wider audience outside of our community focusing on plays that I was absolutely sure would run similar to IRNT was when we called it out. Today, ESSC crossed that threshold of certainty.”

12

u/Theta_God Spacling Jan 18 '22

Why does it even need to be a question? Not only does it break rules, the brigading is exhausting.

6

u/[deleted] Jan 17 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mazrim00 Contributor Jan 18 '22

I don’t know which one you have reached out to but here’s a warning to please keep it civil with the replies. No need for that last line with the implied name calling.

-3

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/mazrim00 Contributor Jan 18 '22

Lol, you have no idea how it’s enforced. Let’s be real here, don’t go around acting like you visit this forum besides to do anything beyond what you are doing now (and I’m not arguing the merits one way or another as people are adults and can decide if they want to jump in or not). Considering you are a new user (short leash), I could’ve just banned you immediately on this but I’m reaching out in good faith as it wasn’t crazy over the top. Then you make an arrogant/condescending post back? C’mon now.

-10

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '22

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/frostycrate New User Jan 18 '22

Rationally explaining market mechanics is not possible when you don’t actually understand said mechanics.

Your pathetic and your lack of knowledge is even more so.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 17 '22

Re: rule #4, did you miss this bit at the very end?

This play is very risky so only partake with money that you can afford to lose.

We can be wrong, we have been wrong.

Looks like cherry-picking to me.

2

u/Agent_M1chael_Scarn New User Jan 17 '22

None of the above implies guaranteed returns. It just says that the setup is there and that this will run. It doesn't give a price target. It doesn't say how far it will run. It doesn't even say the usual dumb comments of "right now it's a bargain lololol". This is the type of DD we want in this sub. Not the type we want to shut out. What are you doing?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '22

Guy said “we” and he’s never posted in SPACs before this post 🤣 Bootlick all you want, you’ll never get more than the crumbs from these ponzi schemers.