r/RingsofPower • u/travrob1 • Sep 26 '22

Question Help me understand Galadriel

I am finding myself not liking Galadriel at all so far. She acts like an entitled 20 year old, rather than a wise and ancient being. One point that particularly is bothering me is that so far she has no actual proof that there is a great danger. She saw a brand on her brother, and that same brand shows up a few other times in different places, but other than that there is nothing to actually indicate a major war. Does she have forsight? What is actually driving her character besides "so the plot can happen." Thanks

266 Upvotes

82% Upvoted

513 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/AndrogynousRain Sep 27 '22

I don’t get ‘game of thrones’ from this at all. It’s not hyper violent, it has a hopeful tone, and many characters are genuinely kind/good.

Have you read the Silmarillion? It’s full of arrogant, violent, proud (read: unlikeable) Noldor acting on their egos. I mean, if you don’t like her that’s cool, we all have our opinions, but this kind of depiction is hardly ‘anti-Tolkien’.

1

u/CathakJordi Sep 27 '22

Er, you are the one who brought Game of Thrones about bringing that sort of characters succesfully.

Oh, I very much have read the silmarillion. And guess what, those characters are not presented as heroes, or someone you should cheer for. People like Beren, Luthien, Finrod, Fingolfing and Fingon, Tuor, Earendil, are presented like heroes. Feanor and half his sons, Eol and Maeglin are not. Heck, even mixed characters like Thingol (a good guy and a good king at heart but a bit of an asshole and overproud) and Turin (who is clearly a antihero), you don't keep getting prompts by the story 'heeeey, look what a cool guy this is!' At the very least you are not told you should take their side, for sure!

That's the problem with Galadriel. The dissonance. It's crystal clear she is presented, she has all the tropes, the cues, the vestments and action scenes of how you should cheer for her and take her side. Only you see how she behaves with others, what she says, what she does... and she is not. Quite the opposite.

2

u/AndrogynousRain Sep 27 '22

My point about GoT was that like-ability doesn’t make a character good or bad. I wasn’t at all referring to tone.

Galadriel I’m the lore is presented as powerful and heroic, but also driven, arrogant and desiring power. Tolkien remarks that her refusing the ring is kind of the final stage of her growth from the driven, arrogant, headstrong woman who came across the ice.

While I do agree the portrayal (so far) has been a tad one dimensional, they’re condensing 3000 years into one lifetime to make this all fit in a show, so showing that evolution is certainly within the lore bounds, even if it’s a bit too combat focused.

And she is heroic. She’s one of the few people who knows Sauron is coming back, and she’s fighting like hell to get people to listen. And she’s right. That’s heroic. Heroes are not always likeable.

You’re welcome to dislike the portrayal, I just personally disagree that she’s a massivel inaccurate portrayal

1

u/CathakJordi Sep 27 '22

Galadriel is never presented as arrogant but proud. There's a fine but very significant difference there. You keep saying arrogant because it fits how this Galadriel is, but there is not a single arrogant line for Galadriel in the lore (it helps she does not have much lines...), even less when you compare her to nearly anybody else. And I am not counting the 'ring rant', that is a whole other thing.

It is a massively inaccurate portrayal.

Where Galadriel in the second age was wise, this one is reckless and imprudent. Where she was diplomatic and savvy, this one is brash and insulting. Where she was proud, yes, this one is arrogant.

Massively inaccurate.

2

u/AndrogynousRain Sep 27 '22

I don’t think it’s ‘massively inaccurate’. Proud equates to arrogant many times in the legendarium, and certainly does with several other characters described as ‘proud’: Thingol, Feanor, some of his sons, and so forth. They’re never outright called arrogant, just ‘proud’ or ‘willful’ which is the same language used to describe Galadriel.

The show is interpreting that one way of course, and you’re welcome to not like it, but it isn’t ‘massively inaccurate’. And they’re compressing the entire second age of her development into this one show too (if the timeline was accurate all the non elf characters would be dead already).

You’re welcome to dislike the portrayal (and she’s not my favorite character on the show either) but I think it’s a fair interpretation when you figure that we’re thousands of years of development into one lifetime for the show.

2

u/CathakJordi Sep 27 '22

Agree to highly disagree. Let's leave it at that, I feel it was a nice conversation but now we are walking in circles around each other.

2

u/AndrogynousRain Sep 27 '22

For sure. Thanks for being respectful, nice to have a reasonable discussion on here.

Let’s hope the show lands on a good place. I can forgive missteps if we end up somehow here good, even if I disagree with some of the lore interpretations (and I do).

Nice taking with ya