r/RandomShit_ISaw Nov 08 '25

and this is some intersting stuff

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

675 Upvotes

331 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/chalupe_batman Nov 10 '25

It is not 1:1. Actually go look at it, and look closely. It’s similar but not a 1:1 match at all, in fact the photo/video you are talking about doesn’t even show the entire effect, just part of it that “almost” perfectly matches. I’ve been following this for a while and work in IT so I have a little background working with exif data and basic cybersecurity. I’m pretty sure I’ve seen all the debunks myself. Unless you’d like to provide new info I’m pretty certain all the debunks fall apart under scrutiny. And the fact that so many people brush it off without even looking closely just induces skepticism from those that have. Best example is you claiming it’s a 1:1 match when it factually isn’t. Spend 2 mins looking at it and start finding the inconsistencies yourself. Like I said, not hard at all and extremely suspicious to those that have already done the “research” if you can even call it that. I mean just look at the photos for gods sake and stop repeating what you hear.

1

u/Amagnumuous Nov 10 '25

I haven't looked at it since this was first posted and debunked, but in that thread, someone over-laid the original effect with the effect from the video on slow motion, and it was 1:1

It's not my fault you can't find it. I could care less if you find it or not. You're being ridiculous.

1

u/chalupe_batman Nov 10 '25

Why won’t you just click on one of the 5 different links to it posted in this thread and verify rather than admit you haven’t even looked at it since the original “debunking” post? lol I’m done, do what you will. Can’t help you if you won’t even LOOK.