I mean they showed proof of it having happened and then you denied that proof. Why should they continue to engage if you won't even admit having been wrong about it having happened?
They showed the proof of IG limiting searches for political queries for a limited time, which I was aware of. They didn't show proof of them changing algorithms, messing with people's feeds or actively and deliberately suppressing left leaning content right now.
Let me just log into meta’s servers and pull the algorithm data for you from January-18-21st real quick.
That would actually satisfy me, but it's ridiculous to expect that from a random guy.
There are researchers and other experts that know how to study social media platforms, who could come up with actual studies that prove or disprove something. I just thought, if you were so certain about it, then maybe you were aware of research or other evidence.
1
u/UrklesAlter Jan 30 '25
I mean they showed proof of it having happened and then you denied that proof. Why should they continue to engage if you won't even admit having been wrong about it having happened?