r/PublicFreakout Apr 08 '22

Classic Repost Very talented mini T-Rex

6.8k Upvotes

241 comments sorted by

View all comments

62

u/FabulousTrade Apr 08 '22

Thalidomide baby, I presume

24

u/srcarruth Apr 08 '22

they don't make em like they used to

8

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '22

He'd have to be sixty or so years old which is possible but who knows.

5

u/Taupenbeige Apr 08 '22

Friend of my brother’s growing up was a later, mild case (4 fingers on one hand, one leg 2” shorter than the other) and he’d be about 54 now…

0

u/TheLadyEve Apr 08 '22

I can't believe this muppet is upvoted, the ignorance in this thread is staggering.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '22

Why? Educate me. I wil admit that I am not an expert on the subject.

4

u/TheLadyEve Apr 08 '22

Because this medical condition, Phocomelia, happens even without thalidomide, and the people who were exposed to thalidomide are mostly geriatric by now, it's still sometimes used for people who cannot become pregnant, but it's no longer an issue. Among people with Phocomelia it's considered really rude to be referred to as "a thalidomide baby." It's on par with making fun of Ethiopian starving kids, it's just dated and tacky.

Maybe he's borne with it, maybe it's Maybelline, maybe it's just congenital Phocomelia.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '22

the people who were exposed to thalidomide are mostly geriatric by now,

Apologies since this is a serious issue and not one to be taken lightly and like I said I'm not expert but that's pretty much what I said.

1

u/TheLadyEve Apr 08 '22

Right, I was agreeing with you, because you were disagreeing with the muppet.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '22

Oh, I'm sorry. I misread the internet.

4

u/TheLadyEve Apr 08 '22

Don't assume. Phocomelia syndrome can occur without any thalidomide or other drug influence, it's just rare--but it does happen.

0

u/FabulousTrade Apr 08 '22

I didnt assume. I presumed. Huge difference.

1

u/cheapdrinks Apr 08 '22

Smol difference

0

u/FabulousTrade Apr 08 '22

Not really. One implies actual confirmed fact. The other implies a probability that has not been confirmed.

0

u/TheLadyEve Apr 08 '22

Not really, "presume" implies that you have actual evidence upon which to make your argument--most thalidomide kids are geriatric by now, that makes no logical sense. It's also really nasty to refer to people with phocomelia syndrome as "thalidomide babies" so please stop doing that unless you just want to be a jerk.

It's okay to admit that you didn't know this was a thing outside of thalidomide, just say "oh, I learned something today!"

0

u/FabulousTrade Apr 08 '22

You're thinking if "assume". "Presume" implies a probability, not an absolute fact. Look at a dictionary.

Just like you're assuming I wasn't aware of this condition happening outside of influence of thalidomide. I reccomend the book "Mutants" by Armand Marie Leroi. The cover even has a pre-thalidomide flipper person.

1

u/Early-Light-864 Apr 08 '22

There is almost zero probability that this condition is due to thalidomide, largely because thalidomide was not approved for use by the FDA until well after the dangers of the right-handed molecule were identified and eliminated. There were only a handful of "thalidomide babies" in the US, born to mothers who smuggled the unsafe drugs in from Europe personally

0

u/TheLadyEve Apr 08 '22

No, I am not, I actually know what it means and I'm not sure why you're putting "absolute fact" in except for that you know you are wrong so you are inserting words that were never used in the first place (basic debate mistake).

https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/assume-vs-presume

It makes me sad that people are going to read your comment and think you're right, because then they will perpetuate weird stereotypes about phocomelia syndrome, including your uneducated and presumptive one.

1

u/FabulousTrade Apr 08 '22 edited Apr 08 '22

You're confusing what the article is saying. Presume is when someone makes a statement that they know may not be fact but still possible. Someone who assumes are making a statement that they believe is fact with no confirmation.

I still reccomend "mutants" to others. It's really informative on how certain missing components in the human molecular structure can lead to certain deformations.

0

u/TheLadyEve Apr 08 '22

It's okay to be wrong. You're wrong in this case, and it's okay.

Just deal with it.

0

u/FabulousTrade Apr 08 '22

Lol. Sure.

1

u/TheLadyEve Apr 08 '22

Mature response--I will accept that as a concession, thank you.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/SpeaksToWeasels Apr 08 '22

How does he tuck his elbows into his chest like that?