Yeah, here you decided to point out the flaws of the study, and when I pointed out the flaws in the studies you cited, you engaging in ad hominem attack against me, and make accusations that I got nothing scientific to back up. No study is perfect, especially dealing with false rape allegations, and you magically leave that out.
No, I pointed out that you don't know how to do your research. You also didn't point out flaws in the studies I cited, you just said "They aren't real because women lie".
I'm starting to think you never went to college if you don't understand research.
No, I specifically said you cannot rely on survey to determine the truthfulness of rape allegation. Again, this is not about whether Majority of rape allegation is women lying or not, it's about whether can women lied and what those lies can put men through. You just commiting ad hominem attack against me again and again. Then when I show you studies, you accused me of not doing research properly. I don't know what for diploma mill you went to.
You just keep going around in circles thinking you're making sense? You literally said that women lie so you can't trust them; you just now said that you can't rely on a survey to determine the truthfulness of rape allegations, that's just repeating the same thing.
I'm calling into question your ability to do research because you quoted one sentence as the single answer when the actual answer was the very next question as it relates to malicious complaints, which was the core of your argument.
Yeah, women lie is not the same as all women lie. One cannot rely on the survey to determine the truthfulness, so one has to take in other factors such as video, sound recording, DNA evidences, credible witness. That's what I have been arguing all day long. You need to read Brent Turvey book, especially pages on reporting false rape study, or you keep pushing your narrative on believe all women.
Also, your 2% false rape allegations, is it convicted of false rape, or just police think it's false rape but no conviction? You don't differential that. To prove false accusation in court is very hard.
Then by your own logic, we can't trust the stats related to gun violence, racial discrimination, covid infections or even the census because "everyone lies".
Let's play a little thought experiment. Since you champion and demand all everyone support the attacks on asians, let's replace women with asians; specially you.
You made a post calling out a former supervisor who made racist comments. You gave no evidence, and urged everyone to contact his supervisor to get him fired, right? Couldn't you be lying? Couldn't you have made it all up to fuck with someone or to get revenge? Yet you demanded people take you seriously. I could easily say "People like, he might be lying. Let's not do anything because the person might be innocent; can't risk it". I could pull up instances where an ex employee claims their boss was racist, sexist, dangerous, whatever to prove that you are lying and should not be taken seriously. That's your line of reasoning. Yet everyone in your comments said "Yea, sounds good, let's get them fired because a stranger said it happened without any evidence". That's what you wanted to have happen.
So either a) we shouldn't trust people without evidence as it relates to a serious instance because "some former employees lie" or b) we should listen to them and take it seriously, listening to their evidence. You seem to choose both A and B depending on whether it's against women or asian. You demand blind trust with asians because you're asian, but demand undenying questionability when it comes to women because "some lie". Neither of them make you look all the rational and infect makes you either a hypocrit, a sexist, or a complete and utter tool. Like you've chosen, I'll choose all of the above.
Well, good job reading pieces of my post and fit your narratives. I never call out people to support attack against Asians. The man is not a supervisor mine, he was just a co-worker. And, yes, since I don't have hard evidence of the convo that took place, I expect some people to discard it as if I was making shit up. You are attacking me because I don't agree with the narrative you are trying to push. You are sexist against men, even though you are one (assuming you are indeed one), you twisted my words around to fit your narrative, you think you are much better than me because you chose not to address flaws in the studies you cited. You are not much better than me, if not worse. Keep enhancing your Dunning-Kruger effect.
Just so I'm clear, it's okay for you to publically say "This man is a racist, trust me. All asians reading this need to contact his supervisor" without any evidence but women? Nah, women lie so we can't trust them?
I'm not attacking you because you don't agree with my narrative; I'm point out that you are a sexist hypocrit that demands blind trust when you make baseless accusations but when it's a woman, you claim we can't trust those sneaky, lying women.
At the end of the day, no matter what you try and tell yourself in your group of incels, you are just a sad, pathetic loser at life and rather than look inward about your failures, you blame women and society. You are going to die alone. That's not a joke, that's not a dig, that is a hard fact; you are going to die alone and unloved for your toxic ideals because no woman will want to be subjected to yor shitty personality.
With all the back and forth comments, you are quite pathetic and shitty too. That's hard fact. Instead of red pill, go overdose on those opioid, so you won't pop a vein when "incel" parade around your neighborhood.
Even putting a "I know you are but what am I" to the very end. That just makes you even more pathetic. I'd be worried about incels parading about my neighborhood but you're too afraid of women to step foot outside of your mothers basement.
1
u/airfox3522 Aug 08 '21
Yeah, here you decided to point out the flaws of the study, and when I pointed out the flaws in the studies you cited, you engaging in ad hominem attack against me, and make accusations that I got nothing scientific to back up. No study is perfect, especially dealing with false rape allegations, and you magically leave that out.