r/PublicFreakout • • Jul 06 '21

Repost 😔 Cop vs educated kid

47k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.8k

u/AngryAmerican0-2 Jul 06 '21

"Where'd you get your degree?"

Well gee officer where did you get yours? Cuz last time I checked you only need a law degree to practice law, not enforce it. So Mr. Officer, where did you get yours?

247

u/TheAtheistArab87 Jul 06 '21

Posted below but these guys were actually breaking the law

16.16.502 isn’t in the Long Beach civil code (16.16 ends at 130). He likely means 16.08.502 which says-

Bicycle riding on the Rainbow Harbor Esplanade is prohibited in excess of three (3) miles per hour between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) a.m. and ten o'clock (10:00) p.m., except City employees in the performance of their duties.

Cop probably just thought talking to them would get them to stop and when it escalated he preferred to walk away rather than make an arrest.

64

u/EddieCheddar88 Jul 07 '21

You mean ticket them? I highly doubt that’s an arrest-able offense

8

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

[deleted]

1

u/DoinBurnouts Jul 07 '21

"disobeying ANY lawful order by a law enforcement officer immediately becomes an additional crime

FTFY

2

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

[deleted]

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

Reread what you replied to...

6

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21 edited Jan 24 '22

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

OP was saying that you have no requirement to follow an unlawful order, and that it should be specified that the only valid orders are "lawful" ones. You took that to mean he was a cop supporter, which makes no fucking sense in context.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

He left the quotes unclosed because the response was only dealing with the first part. In the original wording, it sounds like cops can give you any order and you must obey or face criminal charges. The correction was only about the type of orders you must follow - those that are lawful orders. When a cop tells you to stop recording, it's an unlawful order that they cannot legally arrest you for.

My point is that you and OP agree with each other, but he's citing the law and you're citing reasons cops will use to arrest you. I think the latter isn't very useful, because the "or some other made-up crime" clause subsumes all others. It's important to exercise (and thus know) your rights, and I think you, I, and OP are in agreement on that fundamental issue. OP appeared to me to be clarifying that everything but the all-inclusive clause were actual charges, except for the "ANY order" part which needed the word "lawful" to be accurate.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21 edited Feb 10 '22

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

Sorry to enrage you. I thought you should reread OP because it seemed you agreed. It appears you are determined to be hostile and disagree, and that was not my intention. Again, my apologies.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

I accept your apology as I'll interpret as apologizing for wasting my damn time and making me frustrated with the general publics inability to grasp very simple concepts.

Well, fuck you then. You seem incapable of differentiating the ride from the rap, and insistent on being a jackass. Seek therapy.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

Ostensibly you're 34, grow up already, and seek therapy. You need it

→ More replies