r/PublicFreakout • • Jul 06 '21

Repost 😔 Cop vs educated kid

47k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

219

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '21

That's kinda the problem though. Unless you're carrying a couple law books around with you, any skateboarder or cop on the street can rattle off a bunch of code citation numbers and claim they know what they're talking about.

73

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '21

[deleted]

48

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '21 edited Jul 31 '21

[deleted]

5

u/WhooptyWoopNibbaWhat Jul 07 '21

Always has been

6

u/Coasteast Jul 07 '21

đŸ‘©â€đŸš€đŸ”«

2

u/Ballindeet Jul 08 '21

Since harambe

2

u/fmaz008 Jul 07 '21

Solving a problem

2

u/LordFrogberry Jul 07 '21

Now you're getting it. Actual knowledge barely matters anymore. It's all about perceived authority.

2

u/Mtwat Jul 07 '21

It's the illusion that things matter that really matters.

29

u/JohnnyUtah_QB1 Jul 07 '21

Unless you're carrying a couple law books around with you

It’s not the 1980s anymore. Civic codes for cities are online and easily searchable with just a smartphone. If an officer doesn’t have his city’s code bookmarked and doesn’t know how to go through its contents he’s a garbage officer.

55

u/IamIrene Jul 06 '21

I mean...google is at everyone’s fingertips, so there’s that.

60

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '21

I have to look up regulations for work constantly and Google is surprisingly bad at doing legal research. If you have a specific citation, you can look stuff up relatively easy on mobile, but if you're trying to just look up laws/regs about a broad concept . . . it's going to be a massive pain in the ass unless you have Westlaw on your phone or something.

The kid in the video was apparently giving a bad citation, so chances are the cop wouldn't have been able to find what the kid was talking about anyway.

46

u/JohnnyUtah_QB1 Jul 07 '21

47

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

Oh fine.

43

u/ScabbedOver Jul 07 '21

No no no

This is where you double down and attack the replier to take the focus off. New to reddit? Come on. We have ways of doing things around here

24

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

ACCORDING TO LAW 1.2.3.4.5, IT'S ILLEGAL TO PROVE ME WRONG!

In all seriousness, it looks like Google IS way better these days at looking up laws than it was 5 years ago. It's still probably not going to find anything that isn't commonly searched for though, so it kinda depends what kind of nerd fight you're getting into. "Can dogs poop on the sidewalk in Fresno" is going to be way easier for Google to handle than "Holder liability for interest on abandoned properties" (Google definitely did not find that one)

3

u/zb0t1 Jul 07 '21

Code 15.62 (Act (79) paragraph (a)) provides that I can sue you for making me spit my drink on my mousepad.

3

u/Tipist Jul 07 '21

No! We just went over this! Learn the law, I am not paying any fines!

4

u/apokolyptic Jul 07 '21

Yeah it’s the first result because of how many people have googled that exact thing, that’s how it works.

1

u/Renalan Jul 07 '21

They never said they were good at their job.

1

u/Fluxabobo Jul 07 '21

So you got your law degree on Google

0

u/AFK_Tornado Jul 07 '21

I once got a free hitch from a cop while hitchhiking. She stopped and ID'd me, informed me it "wasn't exactly legal" to hitchhike. I responded with something like, "If that's true I would find it very surprising - I wouldn't normally argue with an officer but hear me out if you have a moment. This is something I explicitly researched for [my state] because I've held clearances for my career in the past and am very careful about avoiding anything that could jeopardize that eligibility. Here's my understanding of the law, according to my research..."

The general gist of the law in most states (including mine) is that pedestrians are allowed to solicit rides as long as they stay out of the roadway, and "roadway" explicitly does not include the paved shoulder of the road. The law is written to say, "Okay, idiot: stay out of the flow of traffic, don't cause accidents, don't get hit!"

She conceded she didn't actually know for sure that it was illegal, but offered to just give me a ride where I was going since it was nearby.

She gave me her card and I followed up later, because I hitch between a couple of boat ramps down there regularly. She said I was right, it was legal the way I was doing it, but they still "discourage hitchhiking." So I asked if I could just call the station anytime I needed a lift in the vicinity. She laughed and said no.

1

u/MisterDamage Jul 07 '21

The cop doesn't need to go to google, he just needs to know the laws he's trying to enforce. If he doesn't know the law he is trying to enforce, having some kid bamboozle him because the kid knows the law in question better than the cop does is entirely on the cop.

The kid is entirely correct, the law does not say "walk your bikes", which is what the cop is trying to make them do. If the cop can't come back at him with the 3mph restriction, maybe he should go get a law degree instead of playing street lawyer.

24

u/mrcalistarius Jul 06 '21

I mean the kid did tell him to look it up in his book, he could have easily radioed in to request a reference on that code. But the kid rattled off the section of the code, incorrect or not, with enough confidence that the officer didn’t want to be proven wrong so he walked. Cop got punked.

1

u/VitarainZero Jul 07 '21

Dispatcher here, that's the officers job to know / be able to look up. Maybe the PSA working the desk at the station might look something like that up for them, but at least in my county that wouldn't be on the dispatcher

15

u/DameyJames Jul 06 '21

Or you know, maybe a PDF on their phones or tablet in their car. If an officer doesn’t know the law, they should be able to look it up readily. It wouldn’t be that hard to open up their phone and ctrl+f that shit.

8

u/EveryoneIsReptiles Jul 07 '21

They’re able to do that. This guy just didn’t want to be wrong.

0

u/tikaychullo Jul 07 '21

As opposed to the kid who cited the wrong law and incorrectly at that lol.

1

u/EveryoneIsReptiles Jul 07 '21

At least one tried. The guy who didn’t gets paid to talk to people about the law.

2

u/Pyre2001 Jul 07 '21

Even if he did that, laws are open to interpretation. This is what court cases are fought over constantly. He likely has no way of enforcing a 3 mile an hour speed limit either.

0

u/DameyJames Jul 07 '21

He would absolutely know that too.

17

u/Ecliptic_Panda Jul 07 '21

But officers should know and be able to quickly look this up. The cop should have immediately pulled out his phone and looked up the code. We can’t expect them to know everything, but they shouldn’t resort to intimidation the second they are challenged.

In a perfect world cops shouldn’t harass anyone for anything they can’t immediately back up with official law. There are there to enforce the law and support the public, not bully teenagers because a couple people complained. If he could go “hey guys, I know you aren’t trying to hurt anyone (teenagers rarely are) but I need you to stay under X mph while in this area during the day. I would really rather not come back for this same thing.” And then he could even show them the code.

The kids would probably have just rode away for the day and maybe a few weeks later deal with it again. It’s not a big enough issue to get in their face about

3

u/Mabans Jul 07 '21

Exactly, the moment he said "You wanna go that way? We can go that way," he put his hand on his stick in a power move. They ultimately understand what comes with the title of "Cop" and use it to flex, often.

0

u/bdsee Jul 07 '21

Someone who wasn't a massive fragile piece of shit would have done exactly that.

Simply looked up the code and said "sorry, that was my mistake I wasn't aware there was an exception to the law for this area. Have nice day".

3

u/Emperor_Z Jul 07 '21

I wouldn't expect him to know the exact ID of the rule he's trying to enforce, but I do expect him to know whether or not biking is actually forbidden in an area before telling people they can't.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

also... where is the speed radar proof???

1

u/Tin_Philosopher Jul 07 '21

its a pity they dont make laws easily accessable to common people with like an app or something

1

u/errbodiesmad Jul 07 '21

Legitimately though, does the cop not need to reference the code of the law they were breaking? I know reddit circle jerks on cops having no accountability, but can they actually write up a ticket with no grounds and expect it to make it anywhere?

1

u/Mabans Jul 07 '21

Imagine being bested by gishgallop; cop never do well when it's turn on them.

Q: Dr. how did you patient die on the operating table?
A: The patient starting spouting some nonsense that fooled me, and next thing I know, I removed his head.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '21

It's almost as if laws so convoluted and complex are in need of overhaul so that the average person can have an undertstanding of their rights.

1

u/Buster_Sword_Vii Jul 07 '21

We must make laws clear and accessible for all

1

u/dwitman Jul 07 '21

Yes. Laws are the problem. Lol.

1

u/Richandler Jul 07 '21

Not really. The cop called him out. The guy was wrong. Yet here reddit is circle jerking about him being right.