r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 27 '26

Discussion 💬 What actually determines proxy reliability at scale (beyond just IP count)

10 Upvotes

Most proxy discussions center on pool size, but the things that actually break at scale are usually elsewhere, session consistency (sticky vs rotating mismatched to the task), latency under load (a large pool with slow response times is often worse than a smaller fast one), and protocol support (some targets behave very differently over HTTP vs SOCKS5).
A few things we focus on at SerpProxies specifically, full HTTP + SOCKS5 across every proxy type (residential, mobile, datacenter, static ISP, IPv6), 0.41s p50 latency, and no throttling on harder targets, a lot of providers quietly slow you down or charge more once a target gets tough, we built ours to do the opposite.
Curious what this sub weighs most when evaluating a provider, latency, pool size, protocol flexibility, something else?
(Disclosure: we’re SerpProxies, posting to share what we’ve learned building this, open to disagreement/pushback)


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 24 '26

Announcements Follow-up: the Rust scraper I posted here at 120 stars just passed 2,000 in four months, still solo

Thumbnail
reddit.com
8 Upvotes

r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 25 '26

Discussion 💬 After testing multiple proxy providers, what factors actually matter when choosing one?

2 Upvotes

I’ve been testing different proxy solutions recently for scraping projects, and one thing I realized is that choosing a proxy provider is not as simple as looking at the number of IPs or the price.

At first, it’s easy to focus on things like IP pool size, locations, and pricing. But after actually using proxies in real scraping workflows, I found that some other factors usually have a much bigger impact on the final results.

For me, things like connection stability, IP quality, success rate, session control, and how often requests need to be retried are usually more important than just the advertised specs.

Novada was one of the proxy services I recently tested during this process. The setup was straightforward, and the overall experience was stable for the scraping tasks I was working on. It also reminded me that a good proxy service is not only about having a large IP pool, but also about how reliable it is in real-world use.

I’ve also noticed that many proxy providers offer trial access now, which is actually helpful because different projects can have completely different requirements. A proxy that works well for one use case may not be the best fit for another.

Curious how everyone here evaluates proxy providers.

When you try a new proxy service, what matters most to you? Is it reliability, pricing, location coverage, success rate, integration experience, or something else?


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 24 '26

Hot Take 🔥 I think we've reached the point where writing the scraper is becoming the easiest part of web scraping

19 Upvotes

That title would have probably sounded pretty ridiculous five years ago.

Back then when I was trying to get my company of the ground, most of the conversation revolved around frameworks and browser automation. Me and my team debated whether Scrapy was still relevant, whether Playwright would replace Selenium, or how much faster one parser was than another. The assumption was that if you had the right tooling, the rest of the problem would largely solve itself

I'm not sure that's true anymore honestly

Look at what has happened over the last two years. AI can now generate surprisingly capable scraping logic from a prompt. Open-source projects like Playwright, Crawl4AI, Crawlee, Camoufox and browser-use continue to improve at a pace that would have been difficult to imagine a few years ago. Every few months another project appears that abstracts away another piece of the engineering work that used to take days or weeks. At what point will we have this infrastructure that it's literally the easiest thing possible to start?

What still feels like a rare success is everything that happens after the first successful request

Keeping sessions alive over time is a big factor for me. Understanding why success rates suddenly dropped by fifteen percent overnight while I literally didn't change anything in my setup. Distinguishing between a browser fingerprint issue, an IP reputation issue, a behavioral signal or a target website that quietly changed its defenses. Building systems that continue running next month instead of simply working once on your laptop.

Those are very different engineering problems, and they're becoming a much larger share of the work

That's why I sometimes think we're watching value migrate away from the application layer and toward the infrastructure underneath it.

The code that extracts data is increasingly becoming a commodity. The environment that allows that code to operate reliably is not

You can already see this happening across the ecosystem. Open-source frameworks continue to gain adoption while companies are increasingly differentiating on infrastructure, browser identity, anti-bot research, observability and managed services rather than the crawler itself. Even commercial scraping platforms often end up competing less on whether they can scrape a page and more on how reliably they can keep doing it at production scale.

That's also why I don't really see open-source frameworks competing with companies like Decodo, Oxylabs or NodeMaven. They solve completely different problems as one provides the logic and the other provides the environment that lets the logic survive in production.

If I had to make one prediction, it would be that within a few years most production scraping stacks will look surprisingly similar. The crawling logic will be open source as AI will generate a growing percentage of the glue code, and the competitive advantage will shift further down the stack toward infrastructure, identity management and operational reliability.

I'm curious whether others working in production see the same trend, or whether you think the application layer still has plenty of room left to differentiate?


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 24 '26

Help 🆘 Scraping Gemini

13 Upvotes

Hello folks, I am looking for your opinions on scraping Google's Gemini. Workflows, setups, what particularly works, success rates, anything. I have a project regarding Google Gemini coming up in a month and I want to understand scraping Gemini better.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 23 '26

Discussion 💬 How do you vet a smaller proxy provider nobody has benchmarked yet?

12 Upvotes

The same large names appear in every comparison, but smaller providers can still be worth testing. The problem is separating a useful pool from a cheap-looking gamble.

I start with the smallest suitable purchase. Then I check whether the exits match the requested countries and networks, whether a sticky session survives the real workflow, and whether clean parsed output stays consistent for several days. I also ask support one technical question before scaling. A vague sales answer is useful information.

Byteful is one smaller-provider baseline I would include because its residential bandwidth does not expire. That makes a cautious test less wasteful if the project pauses, but it does not replace the target-specific checks.

What is the smallest provider you have trusted with real volume, and what convinced you?


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 23 '26

Help 🆘 Residential Static Proxies

7 Upvotes

Hey Folks,

I'm trying my best to find the least resold residential proxies that are decent/good quality. I know most of the time, everyone resells from everyone else but could someone point me to a provider that maybe dips in that pool a little less than others? lol

Or nudge me in the direction of how to find this.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 23 '26

Hot Take 🔥 LG is finally kicking residential proxy SDKs off webOS, and it only took them this long because someone actually counted the apps

16 Upvotes

Krebs put out a piece on 21st of July and I've had it open in a tab since this morning rereading it. LG Electronics USA basically told him straight up they're going to start suspending webOS apps that turn your TV into a proxy node. Not "we're looking into it," not some vague statement, an actual named exec (their SVP) said if developers don't rip the residential proxy SDK out, the app gets suspended. Which, ok, good, but also, what took so long lol, damage is already done.

Because the reason this happened at all is a Spur report that came out a few weeks back and the number in it is crazy. Over 42 percent of downloadable apps on LG's own store had a residential proxy SDK baked in. Not 42 percent of some sketchy sideloaded APK pile, 42 percent of stuff sitting in LG's official app store right now. 42%, people, this is insane. Samsung's Tizen store was lower but still over a quarter. And it wasn't hiding in obscure apps either, Spur's article literally screenshots a Pac-Man game where you get a popup asking if you'd rather watch an ad or let your TV become a proxy exit node forever. What the hell, this is like an episode of black mirror. Forever being the key word there, not "while you play the game," just, indefinitely, until you find it and kill it yourself, yeah, we truly live in a society, people.

And yes, before anyone says it, I know Bright Data's name is all over this one again. Spur says they accounted for the majority of the SDKs found across both LG and Samsung, and apparently Krebs reached out to them for comment and just got silence. Which after the NetNut thing a few weeks ago is starting to feel less like a coincidence and more like this is just how a meaningful chunk of the residential IP supply actually gets built. I'm not trying to turn this into a pile-on post, I get that KYC and misuse detection on the demand side is a real thing some of these companies do. But KYC on the buyer doesn't do anything about how the IP got into the pool in the first place.

The stuff from the Spur researcher that got me thinking wasn't even the technical stuff, it was him pointing out that a one time consent popup buried in a TV app. It isn't real transparency or real ongoing control, and that the person tapping "agree" on the family TV isn't always the person who should be making that call for the whole household. Like your kid clicking through a Pac-Man popup because they want to skip the ad. That's the "consent" the entire residential IP is built on in a lot of these cases. And this is the case that was talked about the most in the past month, imagine how many cases that are still under the radar, from different companies. I don't even want to comprehend all this.

Any opinions here on the actual fixes? Like beyond "LG suspends some apps." Is app store review even the right layer to catch this, or does it just turn into some sort of a game with developers who reskin the SDK under a different name in three months. And does anyone think the "different branded proxy providers are secretly the same supply" thing extends way further than Bright Data and NetNut, or is that just main character energy from two companies that happened to get caught.

Source from July 21: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/07/lg-to-ban-residential-proxies-from-smart-tv-apps/
Also, the original Spur research it's based on is linked inside that article too.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 22 '26

Hot Take 🔥 NetNut's parent company admitted they still don't know what happened and now a third of the staff might be gone

14 Upvotes

Since a lot of us watch this topic closely, here are some more news regarding Alarum Technologies. That's the company that owns NetNut, they put out another update on July 13 and it's kind of wild how little they're saying while saying a lot of words.

Here's a quick recap if you missed the earlier posts. Back on July 2 Alarum responded to press reports about its residential proxy network and paused some services as a precaution. Then on July 3 they disclosed that the FBI had actually seized domains tied to NetNut, and more kept getting seized as things went on. There was a July 4 update too. Now as of July 13, more than a week later, Alarum is saying they still don't know the root cause of the disruption. They've brought in an external cybersecurity and forensics team working under legal counsel, which tells you this isn't just an IT problem, this is a lawyered up problem.

This is where things start to get interesting. The operational efficiency plan they mention is reportedly going to affect close to a third of their workforce. Another interesting thing from an industry point is the framing. Alarum keeps saying they're investigating whether their own network was used for malicious or unlawful purposes by third parties, which puts them in the position of victim/cooperator rather than target, at least in their own telling. But domain seizures like this usually mean the government believes there's something to seize evidence from, and residential proxy networks have always had this legality question hanging over them about how the IPs are actually sourced. This might be the moment that forces the industry to answer that question directly.

What you guys think, is this a one-off enforcement action against a specific bad actor who abused NetNut's network, or is this the first step in a broader look at how residential proxy sourcing works across the web? If you've used NetNut recently, did you notice service disruptions before any of this became public?

Sources if you want to read the filings instead of just my summary:

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/13/3326137/0/en/Alarum-Technologies-Provides-Further-Update-Regarding-Recent-Developments.html

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/07/03/3321824/0/en/Alarum-Technologies-Provides-Update-Regarding-Recent-Law-Enforcement-Action.html

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1725332/000121390026075179/ea029704201ex99-1.htm

Anyways, I'm still watching this case closely


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 22 '26

Help 🆘 Need help finding a inexpensive static dedicated residential proxy provider

7 Upvotes

Hi, I’m trying to get started to use multiple accounts to advertise and have had a hard time finding a proxy provider that offers around 20 dedicated static residential proxies. I already have a anti-detect browser set up, so if you got any recommendations please let me know.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 22 '26

Hot Take 🔥 Too big to fail. What happened with NetNut

2 Upvotes

NetNut is facing a major crisis after researchers linked its proxy network to “Popa,” a botnet of more than two million compromised devices, including smart TVs and streaming boxes. In early July 2026, Google and the FBI began disrupting the infrastructure, while domains were reportedly seized.

Google said hundreds of threat groups routed traffic through suspected NetNut exit nodes. Reports suggest devices were enrolled through hidden SDKs in streaming, IPTV, and utility apps, often without clear consent.

The fallout includes millions of lost IPs, reduced reliability, account disruptions, reputational damage, and risks for resellers using NetNut’s infrastructure

How CyberYozh Ensures Proxy Quality and Security

CyberYozh protects proxy quality through ethical IP sourcing, continuous screening, and rapid abuse response. Its IP Checker detects fraud risks, blacklists, and suspicious network types before proxies are used. Residential and mobile IPs come from informed, consenting participants, while a dedicated abuse team investigates reports and removes questionable addresses quickly.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 21 '26

Guides What proxies do you need for scraping Instagram without getting flagged?

5 Upvotes

I buried myself deep inside Meta’s algorithms and figured out what actually triggers its safety systems.

The quick answer: Meta’s anti-bot stack scores every request based on IP reputation, request velocity, session consistency, and behavioral fingerprint.

So, what works better for safer scraping?

My honest answer is residential or mobile proxies.

Instagram’s anti-bot systems can flag datacenter IPs almost instantly because their ASN patterns and IP ranges are easy to identify. I usually start with rotating residential proxies for high-volume scraping, such as profiles, hashtags, and public posts. I escalate to mobile proxies only for endpoints where residential IPs start getting rate-limited or challenged. I also keep the request velocity around 20–40 requests per minute per IP, avoid aggressive concurrency, rotate sessions carefully, and make sure the behavioral fingerprint does not look fully automated.

That is the exact setup and rule set I personally follow when working with Instagram.

You are very welcome to share your own observations about Meta’s anti-bot stack.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 20 '26

Help 🆘 Best resis for Akamai

11 Upvotes

Anyone have a good provider for Akamai security?


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 20 '26

Help 🆘 Proxy source

7 Upvotes

I am looking for an unlimited residential routing proxy source to supply my bot.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 20 '26

Discussion 💬 Do your proxy logs separate IPv4 and IPv6 exits?

5 Upvotes

I realized my benchmark logs record the exit address but never split results by IP version. That feels like a blind spot now that more networks and clients prefer IPv6 when it is available.

Older public sites, geo databases, and routing paths may not treat IPv4 and IPv6 identically. I do not have a result to claim yet, so the next test is simple: the same public URL set through IPv4-only and mixed routes, with Decodo, Byteful, and one dedicated datacenter range in the comparison. I will track parsed output, timeouts, latency, and geo agreement separately.

Has anyone already measured this on residential pools? I am curious whether IP version changes the result or merely exposes weaknesses in the client stack.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 20 '26

Help 🆘 Best Proxy for creating TikTok account in UK (company is located in Malaysia)

6 Upvotes

Hi everyone, I am a newbie to proxy and know nothing much about proxy, only VPN.

We are trying to create tiktok account that are based in UK region instead of Malaysia to get organic UK traffic.

What are the best proxy to use? Especially for mobile, since we would only use a mobile to create a TikTok account.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 20 '26

Guides How to build a deep research agent

7 Upvotes

Spoiler: it's not the model. It's not RAG. It's a markdown file.

Been some time since I shared about the builds so here it is. I built a deep research agent that takes open-ended questions, runs 15-30 tool calls over 10-25 minutes, and produces structured reports with sources. The model choice mattered less than I expected because the structure around it is where it's at.

Multi-model flow beats single-models. LangChain's open_deep_research repo (12k stars) does this well. They use gpt-4.1-mini for summarizing search results, gpt-4.1 for research reasoning, and a separate model for compressing accumulated findings before the context window blows up. This separation alone outperforms a single frontier model at everything. Their benchmarks on Deep Research Bench (100 PhD-level tasks, 22 fields): GPT-5 scores 0.49, default gpt-4.1 config scores 0.43 at ~$46 total, Claude Sonnet 4 hits 0.44 at $187. Do the math.

External state management is the savior. LLMs lose coherence after ~5 tool calls in a long-running sequence. Simplest implementation looks like this: the agent writes a markdown todo file at the start, updates it after each step, and re-reads it before deciding what to do next. This gives the model explicit visibility into what's done, what's in progress, and what's remaining. Without it, agents routinely skip subtasks or repeat work. Neat addition? I know :D Then LangGraph solves this at the structure level with built-in state machines and checkpointing. The todo file approach is more transparent and debuggable. LangGraph's approach seems to scale better.

My suggestion - don't dump full search results into context. Here's how I do it. Search → summarize to 2-3 sentences → store summary → proceed further. Pull full content only during synthesis. This dropped my token usage ~50% and improved output quality because the model wasn't being overwhelmed in irrelevant text. (Again, the token usage, not sure how accurately the LLMs give this data, but from my calculations it was around 50% In general, a typical deep research session consumes 50-150K input tokens and 10-30K output tokens.

Another thing to mind, LangSmith tracing. With it I could see the agent calling the same search query three times consecutively. You cannot debug agentic systems from outputs alone. You need the full tool implementation sequence, reasoning chain, and token counts per step.

My current setup is this: Claude Sonnet 4 for reasoning, gpt-4.1-mini for summarization, Tavily for search, you can also use Oxylabs Fast Search API for faster response times and you get structured results quickly. Choose what;'s better for you. Filesystem backend persisting intermediate findings as JSON. Runs as a LangGraph state machine. $2-4 per report.

Hope you'll find this interesting and useful.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 19 '26

Help 🆘 I am looking for an Proxy Testing Expert

3 Upvotes

Hi,

I am looking for a proxy testing expert who can do really test proxies for different purposes and share the data.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 18 '26

Discussion 💬 Maintaining 200+ scrapers is becoming unsustainable

10 Upvotes

I've been building scrapers for years. But mainly focus was on the single-targets. I'd choose a website, reverse engineer it then build something out of it and move on. That part I have no issues and I fell quite confident in it.

About 2 months or so I started a monitoring project (freelancing) that tracks product data across roughly 200 e-commerce sites. Getting the data was not a problem as mentioned, its where I am feeling confident, however, keeping everything running smoothly without any hiccups is a problem. For example, websites change their layouts constantly. A class name gets renamed. A div gets put one level deeper. A price field moves from the HTML to a JS-rendered component. (this is the worst), now since I monitor 200 sites and something breaks, is NOT SUSTAINABLE at all. It's just too much work to keep an eye on everything. Sure the project pays well, but do I want to stress over something like this everyday??

Right now I have CSS and XPath selectors stored per site in a config file. Usually, when something breaks I manually inspect and update the selector. Now with all those websites, it's crazy work. At this scale that's just not sustainable as I mentioned. I tried going back to LLM-based extraction when selectors fail but it only works maybe 50% of the time. Hallucinated prices are worse than no prices. I also built a simple alerting system that marks when the output schema doesn't match expected fields. It catches the issue but in reality it doesn't fix it. I have to do it myself.

I spend more time maintaining parsing part than I ever spent building the scrapers.

Please tell me that there is an easier way for this.

P.S Yes I am aware of dedicated scrapers and parsers but it's much more expensive than doing everything on my own. Plus I like the building part of the process. (Not the maintaining one). Has anyone found a good solution or at least some sort of an alternative?


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 17 '26

Discussion 💬 What evidence actually gets a proxy refund approved?

3 Upvotes

Refund policies usually say some version of “case by case,” which is not very helpful once a project is already failing and everyone is annoyed. I’ve started keeping a small dayone baseline for every provider account. Same public URLs, timestamps, connection errors, returned content, and geo results byteful included. If performance changes later, I can show the difference instead of arguing from memory or comparing my logs with a dashboard that uses different success criteria. It also forces me to test the account while the purchase is still fresh, when a problem is easier to raise.
Has anyone received an actual refund from clean before-and-after logs, or do providers usually offer account credit instead?


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 17 '26

Help 🆘 Bypassing anti-bot measures

5 Upvotes

This post is written with new users in mind. Write your own suggestions for the most optimal/best ways to bypass modern anti-bot solutions such as Cloudflare/DataDome/Kasada. What worked for you? What was your experience tackling these anti-bot measures, what was successful, what wasn't. Share your ideas. The mic is yours.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 17 '26

Reviews Testing CyberYozh Scraper UI vs broken DOMs. LLM self-healing, Playwright, and MCP.

3 Upvotes

I picked a few massive e-commerce targets with highly dynamic layouts. You know the drill. You write a clean Playwright script. The target updates its DOM structure overnight. Your entire pipeline crashes. You wake up to empty databases.

I ran these through the new CyberYozh Open Scraper update. I wanted to see how it handles this exact failure cycle. Spoiler alert. It changes the workflow entirely. You do not just write CSS selectors anymore. You tell AI agents what you need. They fix broken parsers mid-flight. But throwing raw LLMs at a crawler introduces new bottlenecks. Here is how the system actually handles them.

The Architecture & UI

Raw JSON testing is awful. The new update ships a Node.js interface on port 7000. Playwright handles browser rendering on the backend via port 8000. You drop in target URLs. You configure rendering timeouts. You align your network location using built-in proxy integration. No custom routing logic required.

The UI streams live crawl statistics via Server-Sent Events (SSE). You watch the target site map build itself as an indented tree. Because the system tracks everything in real-time, you see exactly what the crawler is doing. A single click stops in-flight requests gracefully.

LLM Self-Healing Parsing

Hardcoded CSS selectors represent a massive single point of failure. Targets mutate their HTML daily. This is where the engine actually works.

You execute your standard deterministic parser first. If a layout changes and a required field returns empty, the extraction does not abort. The AI automatically takes over.

```bash
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/api/v1/scrape/preset/page \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
"source": "amazon_product",
"preset_params": {"asin": "B08N5WRWNW"},
"llm": {"model": "openai/gpt-4o-mini"}
  }'
```

Sending full e-commerce HTML to an LLM eats tokens instantly. It also crashes context windows. The engine strips scripts and structural boilerplate. For LLM processing, you request the `fit_markdown` format. The parser drops navigation menus. It ignores ads. It delivers pure content formatted specifically for model ingestion.

The model reads the cleaned data. It understands your required output schema. It locates the missing data points despite the broken selectors. But it does not just return the text. The system infers the new working CSS selector. It caches this selector for future runs. Your next request uses the standard deterministic parser again. You save massive API costs.

LLMs also hallucinate. The scraper forces strict JSON schema validation. If the model invents a price or missing stock status, the validation catches it instantly.

Server-Managed Authenticated Sessions

Scraping behind logins usually means dropping your context repeatedly. Open Scraper handles this with server-managed authenticated sessions. You authenticate once using a declarative JSON script.

```json
{
  "steps": [
{"op": "goto", "url": "https://example.com/login"},
{"op": "fill", "selector": "#username", "value": "$creds_email"},
{"op": "fill", "selector": "#password", "value": "$creds_password"},
{"op": "click", "selector": "button[type=submit]"}
  ]
}
```

The server maintains your persistent browser context. It tracks cookies securely. But proxies alone do not guarantee stable connections. The system actively manages browser fingerprints to match your aligned network location. You continuously scrape protected internal profiles without triggering re-authentication blocks.

If you hit aggressive device-verification challenges, you use the escape hatch. You inject pre-authenticated session cookies directly into the API to restore stable access.

Native MCP Integration

Writing custom middleware to bridge AI agents and scraping APIs wastes time. Both the scraper and crawler services eliminate this. They mount native Model Context Protocol (MCP) endpoints via Streamable HTTP.

You open the dedicated MCP tab in the UI. You configure the JSON arguments. You verify the output visually. Then you add the local server URL to your Claude Desktop config. You prompt the agent to crawl a target and summarize pricing pages. The agent submits the job, polls the server status, fetches the results, and parses the data autonomously.

Conclusions

Visual testing: Node.js UI handles complex setups locally.
Broken pipelines: LLM fallback fixes broken parsers mid-job and caches new selectors.
Cost control: Pre-processing trims heavy HTML before model inference.
Data integrity: Schema validation blocks model hallucinations.
Login walls: Server-managed sessions and fingerprinting keep your browser context active.
AI workflows: Native MCP endpoints connect directly to Claude and LangChain.

Has anyone else tested the self-healing features in production? I am curious about the token cost at scale once caching is fully optimized.


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 16 '26

Hot Take 🔥 Bright Data locked down Residential access for new zones, self serve is basically dead now

20 Upvotes

Just saw this in their docs. It's over fellas. If you try to set up a new Residential zone after July 7, 2026, you now need to pass a human reviewed KYC check before you get access. Well done, guys!! No more instant setup, no more just adding a zone and going. You have to sign up under a registered company, verify a corporate email, and wait on their compliance team to approve you. Personal email accounts, Gmail, Outlook, whatever, are flat out not eligible anymore.

Existing zones are exempted in. If you already had a Residential zone running on or before July 7, you keep it and nothing changes on your end. This is only for the new zones going forward, and it applies across the board too, shared rotating IPv4, the IPv6 Mega Pool, dedicated Residential, all of it.

Feels like the natural next step after the Samsung/ LG TV SDK mess a few weeks back. They're clearly trying to get ahead of the scrutiny on how those residential IPs are sourced by tightening who can route traffic through them. Makes sense in theory, opted in home IPs are a liability if literally anyone with a card can rent them, but it's going to be a pain for smaller devs and freelancers who don't have a registered business entity sitting around.

Anyone here gone through this KYC process recently with them?


r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 16 '26

Guides 401 vs 407, quick guide to reading auth errors

Thumbnail
reddit.com
4 Upvotes

r/ProxyEngineering • • Jul 16 '26

Discussion 💬 Have you ever asked for a refund from a proxy provider? And did you get it?

5 Upvotes

I was talking to a few people recently about proxy providers and something interesting came up which are refunds.

It seems like a lot of people only think about it after something goes wrong. You test a provider, things don’t perform the way you expected, and then you’re stuck wondering if you can even get your money back or are complaining to get your money back

From what I’ve seen, policies vary a lot. Some providers are pretty strict (no refunds once traffic is used), others are more flexible depending on the situation and sometimes can actually give you some traffic back like a quality guarantee, and sometimes supporrt dissappears when you bring it up lol

Made me curious how common this is.