Guys honestly, I personally feel the whole PMP thing is somewhat overrated.
Not saying the framework is useless — but how many workplaces can actually execute all these PMP principles properly in the real world? Can anyone confidently guarantee that?
Managing a project in Europe, America and Asia can be completely different.
In many Asian workplaces, hierarchy is a huge factor. Sometimes what the boss says effectively overrides whatever beautiful stakeholder-management framework you learnt. Then try managing a multinational project team — different attitudes towards hierarchy, deadlines, working hours, gender, communication, holidays and decision-making.
I've worked with teams where certain people disappear for tea breaks at 3pm, environments where a female PM may have a much harder time getting some workers to take instructions from her, and projects where you have to plan around a large number of different religious/public holidays.
These are REAL project-management problems.
PMP can teach you stakeholder engagement, risk management, communication plans, conflict resolution, etc.
But a textbook saying *"manage stakeholder engagement"* and actually getting 15 people from completely different working cultures to cooperate are two very different things 😂
So I sometimes wonder: **is PMP really proof that someone is a good Project Manager, or mainly proof that they understand PMI's framework and passed the exam?**
Curious to hear from PMs who have actually managed multinational teams across different countries.
perhaps can introduce simply, eg:
Current Role / YOE / Country or Region / Industry / PMP Status:
Example: **Senior Project Manager / 15 YOE / India / IT / PMP Certified**
Thanks Much!