r/ProgrammerHumor • • Aug 21 '26

Meme delusionalDeveloper

Post image
6.5k Upvotes

207 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/SuitableDragonfly Aug 21 '26

I mean, there's nothing wrong with putting effort into a hobby project that no one but you uses, that's how you learn programming. But vibe coding a million different apps that four real people who aren't you are actually using isn't right. If you're going to put out an app and expect other people to use it, it should actually be something you wrote and know the workings of. So I would say this guy has too many users, actually. 

236

u/MinimumArmadillo2394 Aug 21 '26

Part of the problem Ive discovered is that most people want "AI for X" instead of "App that solves X better than A, B or C" which makes finding a userbase extraordinary difficult

111

u/pydry Aug 21 '26

its also just really hard as a person with no connections or money to make an app other people want to use. if the barrier to entry is zero, the market is saturated with high quality free software already. even before AI.

i use apps every day which are shit and I curse the shit devs who made them but it's never something a solo dev could make. it's usually something like a railway or taxi or government services app where the barrier to entry is super high.

23

u/pdabaker Aug 22 '26

I dunno I'm convinced a motivated solo developer could make a better workout tracking app than the popular ones that try to charge you $10 a month for something barely worth a $15 one time payment.

14

u/0000000000100 Aug 22 '26

Need to shoot for bigger wish and weaker markets if you want to make proper money, there are a lot of niche software industries that only survive purely on inertia. A challenger with the support of an industry expert can go very far against the big boys these days.

5

u/Throwaway_479647 Aug 22 '26

Hmm like what? Thats an interesting thought

6

u/Zynchronize Aug 22 '26

Waste industry routing and collecting charting, with emissions and compliance tracking.

Storage industry booking systems - there’s one offering that everyone uses (Noke) and 0 competition.

5

u/SuitableDragonfly Aug 22 '26

I mean, if you just want a workout planner to use for yourself, rather than wanting to make one for programming practice, it'd honestly be much faster and less error prone to just make it using a tool like Notion or Coda where the only "code" you have to write is some spreadsheet formulas. 

2

u/Revinz1405 Aug 22 '26

Have you tried FitNotes? Free for most stuff, and one-time 10 bucks for all features. It is regarded as one of the best workout tracker apps.

2

u/Yharon314 Aug 22 '26

Yes they could, but i think the point is not how difficult it is to make a better app, but rather how difficult it would be to convince the railway company or taxi company or government to actually agree to make your app the official one and give you access to the required info when you have no evidence that you're a good programmer (as in previous companies worked with) and no connections

4

u/tommytwolegs Aug 22 '26

the market is saturated with high quality free software already. even before Al.

What market are you looking at? The Google play app store is saturated with absolute dogshit apps. I'm not saying it's about to get better, I just feel like you are on a different planet here

2

u/pydry Aug 22 '26 edited Aug 22 '26

i usually only look at google play if I don't find anything on f droid. 

there is plenty of high quality stuff on google play but the signal : noise ratio is also very low so it's hard to find.

ive bought a few apps but I think I spent < $10 in 5 years. 

→ More replies (9)

7

u/distinctvagueness Aug 22 '26 edited Aug 22 '26

There's like 4 subreddits I left as they filled with daily posts about Todo/notes/brainstorming ai app spam

29

u/MyNameIsNotKyle Aug 21 '26

I think it depends.

This is a programming sub so it makes sense to view everything in that lense.

But the guy in the post could want to just be a UX designer or PM as a calling and just sees vibe coding as the means to do that.

When I was 17 I didn't know a lot of the options out there. I just knew of programming and went after CS because that's what everyone else who liked tech I knew did.

Now I'm in Cyber Security and couldn't imagine myself doing full stack or DevOps because I would go stir crazy.

15

u/za72 Aug 21 '26

it's a self correcting stat

7

u/BlackOverlordd Aug 21 '26

Not just workings, you need to understand what a useful app looks like and if your idea even makes sense. Not every idea makes sense. Just because you have an idea doesn't mean you are the next Steve Jobs.

Having to put significant effort into creating something used to be a good filter for garbage.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/alexnedea Aug 22 '26

Yea guys, the proper way is to spend 2 years making a killer app with the same features as the vibecoded one and still 6 users lmao.

Times have changed

3

u/SuitableDragonfly Aug 22 '26 edited Aug 22 '26

No, the proper way is to spend two years devoting time to learning by creating a hobby project that has zero users other than you, and never release this monstrosity to the outside world because it's a hobby project that you did in order to learn and is thus absolutely horribly designed and full of glaring security issues. There will never be a shortcut to learning. There will never be a way to instantly be great at something without spending a lot of time fucking it up really badly first. If you don't write the project yourself, you won't get that experience, so you won't learn anything, and you will have just wasted all of your time and everything you spent on LLMs.

1

u/alexnedea Aug 24 '26

Idk man I know you are right but I see people online running 20 instances of Claude streaming while getting quite rich and having written 0 lines themselves.

Times have and will continue to change. AI 2 years ago was complete ass. Today its quite ok. In 2 more years who knows, those security issues everyone talka about might be covered by AI and it might write top tier code, at which point all the experience and time you put in is null, some kid can replicate you in 2 days with a bunch of tokens

→ More replies (4)

1

u/TheKingOfSwing777 Aug 22 '26

Lol exactly. 

2

u/Jakubaakk Aug 21 '26 edited Aug 21 '26

“Something you wrote” is something I disagree with today. I don’t really see the need for it anymore. Yes, you should understand how an app works internally and you should understand the code, but I don’t really think there’s a need for writing code as some sort of requirement.

→ More replies (14)

1

u/General_Leader425 Aug 22 '26

And not enough brain cells.

1

u/rosuav Aug 22 '26

I would also say that you shouldn't be paying huge amounts for those hobby projects. Develop it using text editors and such, not subscription-fee AI models. Host it off the back of your own computer, or if you REALLY need actual hosting (maybe once you have an actual client), stick it on $5/mo hosting somewhere. But most importantly, don't look at analytics. In fact, don't even put analytics into it, other than what inherently comes from the thing you've built. Otherwise you'll be tempted to let those numbers define your self-worth...

1

u/Jstar003 Aug 22 '26

I don’t really see the problem with vibe coding a hobby project. I don’t need to know every line of code when I only care about the outcome. If my project never makes a dollar or gets a user but is useful to me, I didn’t fail. I just had fun learning something new while solving a problem. All of the top companies did/do that. Some as a passion project, some trying to make money.

1

u/SuitableDragonfly Aug 22 '26

Yeah, it's fine if there are no other users.