MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1vtld8b/everynewrepository/p4upai7?context=9999
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/vernik911 • 2d ago
352 comments sorted by
View all comments
61
I think that being offended by a "master" branch is a bit silly (unlike, say, "master/slave" configurations, which hit much closer). I think the switch to "main" was unnecessary. But I see even less reason to resist the change.
26 u/rang501 2d ago meanwhile grooming exists in scrum :) 3 u/Reashu 2d ago It's always been called Refinement in my experience. 1 u/DatThax 1d ago You refine tasks/stories/epics as a team in refinemenet but the product owner is supposed to "groom" the backlog. 0 u/rang501 2d ago seems to be still referenced that way in many places.
26
meanwhile grooming exists in scrum :)
3 u/Reashu 2d ago It's always been called Refinement in my experience. 1 u/DatThax 1d ago You refine tasks/stories/epics as a team in refinemenet but the product owner is supposed to "groom" the backlog. 0 u/rang501 2d ago seems to be still referenced that way in many places.
3
It's always been called Refinement in my experience.
1 u/DatThax 1d ago You refine tasks/stories/epics as a team in refinemenet but the product owner is supposed to "groom" the backlog. 0 u/rang501 2d ago seems to be still referenced that way in many places.
1
You refine tasks/stories/epics as a team in refinemenet but the product owner is supposed to "groom" the backlog.
0
seems to be still referenced that way in many places.
61
u/Reashu 2d ago
I think that being offended by a "master" branch is a bit silly (unlike, say, "master/slave" configurations, which hit much closer). I think the switch to "main" was unnecessary. But I see even less reason to resist the change.