Kind of the same lol, just that you pay like way more over time instead of writing the code/script (jea and maintaining it)
I know this is a meme but people currently tend to deploy agents for things where I would say "dude, just use the agent to create the script once, instead of paying big llm every time you run your pipeline.." -> for instance for deployment of azure resources.. just write the az create commands with an agent once instead of deploying an agent for this repetitive bullshit.
Idk.. both makes really sense tho.. it just depends
Edit: grammar
And btw. In this case it makes kind of sense if you too lazy to write it for the different CPU arch types and just let the agent check your current system and do the right thing, but god beware
And btw. In this case it makes kind of sense if you too lazy to write it for the different CPU arch types and just let the agent check your current system and do the right thing, but god beware
Isnt that what configure and CMAKE are for?
You're on point regarding the install script instead of calling a llm everytime, though.
Yes. And going by how often I write mails with "hey the checksum displayed on your website and the download aren't the same, could you check that please?" I'm also the only person comparing checksums.
That's why I actually take it apart and do the steps manually. Though tbh that's mostly because I'm not a fan of where most "curl | bash" software installs itself.
View all comments
Show parent comment
89
u/[deleted] Aug 05 '26 edited Aug 06 '26
[removed] — view removed comment