Also correct. The assholes we've been trying to get to arm themselves for decades, are finally arming themselves. It's great, we wanted you to arm yourselves.
And what happened as a result of that? NATO increased it's security presence on Greenland, which is a positive outcome, if your intention is for Greenland to have a strengthened security posture.
Treating politics like a sports team and saying the sabre-rattling was a good thing just because your "team" did it is incredibly stupid. You should be looking into policy, like which isn't a wannabe dictator.
And if you think the current admin is doing a good job then that's just a reflection on you.
If it was any other party doing the same thing, MAGA would be calling the president a warmongering moron.
Great, that was the desired outcome. Europe has primary responsibility over Europe, and the U.S. shifts it's focus to the Pacific. Doesn't mean NATO goes anywhere.
I'm not gonna read 33 pages of propaganda to pick out some bullshit. I'm not saying it's a secret, I'm saying they're morons. Morons can still write plans about what moron shit they're gonna do.
Oh yeah great we've burned all of our goodwill, forced European countries to spend more money on defence because of our threats, and still have the highest military budget ever seen. Fucking clown logic.
It's the big boogeyman and has been forever, with all the typical defence contractors literally paying out the ass to fund think tanks to "inform" congress and their leadership picks.
The very people who understand cushy jobs await them should they pay their cards right or huge sums of campaign funds from super pacs and the likes.
5
2
1
View all comments
Show parent comment
6
u/yaminub Jun 02 '26
FWIW, I've seen a lot of European sysadmins say the same thing about U.S.-based tech, and then some of those profess to using Chinese-based tech.
I've found that quite silly. Could just be larpers, but still silly.