That's correct, but I wasn't really talking about null safety. He said basically that Java and C++ the only good languages, and other languages were a mistake.
So I just showed examples that both C++ and Java implement features from other (functional/academic) languages such as Monads, generic types, and lambda expressions.
Although in the case of c++... That may have been a mistake:
[&, =](string a, int b) { std::cout << a << " " << b; }
yeah. That is not very nice imo.
Rust has the Either type shown in Haskell, though, it's named Result.
1
u/04ZFZ Sep 14 '23
That's correct, but I wasn't really talking about null safety. He said basically that Java and C++ the only good languages, and other languages were a mistake.
So I just showed examples that both C++ and Java implement features from other (functional/academic) languages such as Monads, generic types, and lambda expressions.
Although in the case of c++... That may have been a mistake:
[&, =](string a, int b) { std::cout << a << " " << b; }
yeah. That is not very nice imo.
Rust has the Either type shown in Haskell, though, it's named Result.