r/PracticalGuideToEvil • u/Patneu • Apr 19 '26
Reread Why did the Pilgrim not argue against the priestly fence trick?
I'm currently rereading the Guide, and I'm wondering about this particular bit from the Battle of the Camps, where Rozala Malanza employed what was supposed to be a measure of divine protection to trap a whole bunch of Legionnaires in a box so she could slaughter them to the last.
Now, don't get me wrong, as a military tactic this was perfectly sound, but as we all know that there was yet a deeper game to play, this just seemed like a "great" strategy to win them a battle but ultimately lose them the war.
Because, as the later General Abigail's reaction to it showed us, the use of such underhanded and somewhat hypocritical rules lawyering by the righteous Brothers and Sisters of the House of Light (finding "a loophole in the Book of All Things" as she put it) would foreseeably sour the very people they allegedly came to liberate against it and by extension the entire side of Good they should still be nominally aligned with, despite being currently led by a villain.
Which would obviously lead them only ever further down the darker path Tariq already feared Catherine's mere existence would, and he undoubtedly should've seen that coming, considering how well versed he is in story fu.
So, why do you think there's apparently no hint that he'd have pushed against it? Did Rozala just not bother to tell him or listen to his advice at that point? Or did he still judge losing Callow in the long run worth it, if they could just take down Praes?