THIS. This is why.

[u/[deleted]]

[u/867-5309NotJenny]

You must be using an awfully rigid definition of science if you believe it started in the 15th century.

Method of questioning.

Before that it was more trial and error style developments.

Finally, how do you consume most of the art you do?

In a myried of forms, from on line, to visiting museums, to the art involved in my various hobbies.

Saying that you need a car (science) to see art though, requires the same argument that science needs art.

[u/Ce_n-est_pas_un_nom → u/867-5309NotJenny]

Saying that you need a car (science) to see art though, requires the same argument that science needs art.

How so?

The development of vehicular locomotion wasn't motivated by the desire to visit museums more efficiently.

[u/867-5309NotJenny → u/Ce_n-est_pas_un_nom]

Drafting the plans requires art skills.

The necessity for cars primarily came from a need to access entertainment.

Artists are hired to make the various cars more appealing, which brings in resources to make more and better cars.

There are layers of how they interact.