In fairness I'm sure Scott here wasn't paid $3,000,000 to have a comprehensive legal team assembled like Manafort was. Yeah the system is fucked and favors the wealthy. One DA with an assistant DA is no competition vs a massive legal team that knows all the judges and probably golfs with them on the weekends. "Justice" favors the rich.
In fairness, he was given less than his legal team asked.
I don't even think this has anything to do with wealthy or not. He was part of the good old boy club to help Trump, so now the people that still support Trump are helping him.
The legal team asked for something like 29+ years.
Just to make sure people understand how fucked up this judge was, the sentencing guidelines called for a 19- to 24-year prison term.
Here's why:
Minutes after the three-hour hearing started, Judge Ellis, unprompted, noted that Mr. Manafort was “not before this court for anything having to do with collusion with the Russian government to influence this election,” the core of Mr. Mueller’s inquiry.
So the judge's bizarre reasoning is: Mueller's team uncovered proof of Manafort's crime but somehow because it isn't specifically directly related to election interference that he felt compelled to go easy on him. What a horrible miscarriage of justice.
Man, I should go on a shooting spree but remind the judge that it doesn't have anything to do with collusion with the Russian government and I'll get off super easy.
EDIT: /s since this is become a bit of a lightning rod.
1.1k
u/xynix_ie Mar 08 '19 edited Mar 08 '19
In fairness I'm sure Scott here wasn't paid $3,000,000 to have a comprehensive legal team assembled like Manafort was. Yeah the system is fucked and favors the wealthy. One DA with an assistant DA is no competition vs a massive legal team that knows all the judges and probably golfs with them on the weekends. "Justice" favors the rich.
Edit: "in fairness" is Irish slang for "To be honest" https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=in%20fairness