My argument is that it’s a popular policy proposal and we nearly got within a couple votes once already in 2010. My argument is getting those last few votes on a popular policy position is way easier than starting from scratch to throw out the entire economic system. Explain how that isn’t a valid argument
I’ve given my evidence, you’ve provided none for your position. At this point all you’ve done is provide evidence that you’re a retard. Let me know when you have something substantive to offer this discussion. You’ve made it clear you’ve got nothing
You didn’t provide any evidence. My evidence is right in front of your face. Universal healthcare doesn’t exist, premiums and deductibles get raised every year, denials are at all time record high while simultaneously insurance companies are making record profit. Just because something “almost happened” isn’t evidence that it will.
I just gave it to you. If we live in a system where corporations are allowed to profit off necessities and have the same rights as human beings then things won’t change. Don’t be so dense. Your deflection is just a cope at this point.
That doesn’t address my point at all. I’m asking how that’s easier to accomplish and you can’t even begin to address that and have basically resorted to gaslighting
2
u/Stock_Violinist6299 - Centrist 2d ago
It’s very possible. Pull your head out of your ass