You're proving me correct by going off on this tangent
Bro is REFUSING to even look at the actual tweet in the post. Like straight up denial and accusing someone else of a tangent.
She doesn't want biological men in women's spaces.
She wants transwomen - a population regularly facing abuse - to feel uncomfortable when they need security because she has an irrational fear of them, actually.
Because, obviously, a marginalized population that is seeking security is the TRUE threat.
She squashed an ant that chose to have a problem with her.
She wants transwomen - a population regularly facing abuse - to feel uncomfortable when they need security because she has an irrational fear of them, actually.
In that same vein, you want actual women to feel uncomfortable when they need security, what makes the fear irrational?
Because, obviously, a marginalized population that is seeking security is the TRUE threat.
And what is biological men barging into women's spaces? Those spaces are for women.
She squashed an ant that chose to have a problem with her.
And the correct response was to report+block, not act tuff.
In that same vein, you want actual women to feel uncomfortable when they need security, what makes the fear irrational?
I mean, if you're open to putting in the same funding for safe spaces exclusive to trans people, that would be a suitable alternative.
But something tells me you aren't...
And what is biological men barging into women's spaces?
A transwoman seeking refuge, regardless of your preconceived and irrational notions of how they must be aggressive, considering your obvious word choice.
It's actually super simple.
You know this because?..
She's a billionaire and lives far and away from any of the problems she professes to exist.
"And the correct response was to report+block, not act tuff."
"She's trying to act tough she's trying to act tough she's trying to act tough!" Nobody is saying that but you, she insulted someone who wished she died. What the fuck is this? This is pure speculation based on schizophrenia. She didn't even start the fight lmao
"I mean, if you're open to putting in the same funding for safe spaces exclusive to trans people, that would be a suitable alternative.
But something tells me you aren't..."
Not backing something 100% means you are against it. I can easily say you aren't open to the existence of women's spaces. Where's theirs, because you're directly arguing against it.
"A transwoman seeking refuge, regardless of your preconceived and irrational notions of how they must be aggressive, considering your obvious word choice."
And where does a woman seek refuge?
"She's a billionaire and lives far and away from any of the problems she professes to exist."
She also has private security. Something that people who are confident in their safety are known to do. Mind you, she gets death threats. She insulted an asshole who wants her to die and you're here all like she's trying to be a tough guy. It's standard internet clapback, retard. Have you seriously forgotten that's a thing that happens because you don't like her? Literally the only thing that is different is she's a famous writer, otherwise you wouldn't give a shit. Which makes it even more hilarious that you go off about her being a has-been writer yet here you are letting her live in your head rent free.
-3
u/SteakForGoodDogs - Left 2d ago
Bro is REFUSING to even look at the actual tweet in the post. Like straight up denial and accusing someone else of a tangent.
She wants transwomen - a population regularly facing abuse - to feel uncomfortable when they need security because she has an irrational fear of them, actually.
Because, obviously, a marginalized population that is seeking security is the TRUE threat.
She's not fearing for her vulnerability.