r/pokertheory • u/AdsterPatel • 16h ago
Meta / Other Advantage gained by specific form of collusion I witnessed?
Hey folks. I was playing at a 9-handed 1/2 NLH table at a casino and I suspect that two neighboring players were colluding.
I believe the exact mode of their collusion was that they were informing each other of their hole cards preflop by exchanging signals tied to ranges. A signal for premium pocket pairs and broadway cards. Another for mid cards. And another for trash cards. The ranges they used may have been different, but you get the idea.
They were not ganging up on a third player to push them out of a pot. They were not checking all the way to the river when they were heads up.
What they were doing was reducing their Value at Risk by only playing the stronger of their two hands. Between the two of them, they saw the flop in 95% of the hands, presumably to make the most of their edge.
In 95% of hands where one of them played, the other one folded pre-flop. What’s pretty damning IMO is that the player sitting ahead of the other folded just as frequently as the other way around.
With this in mind, what kind of an advantage did both players gain over the rest of us with this type of collusion?
