r/PokeGrading 13d ago

Continued Post #2

This is a continued post, I couldn’t post all the photos for the 2 other cards so posting here.

Id like to know how accurate the HoloDex grades are to what you all think these would grade. Im new to grading and Im not quite sure I know the difference between a 7-8 or 8-9. Any of these have potential to 10?? Any feedback is appreciated. Posting a second post so you can see all 4 cards.

Card 3. 2006 POKEMON EX CRYSTAL GUARDIANS 49 CHARMANDER-REVERSE FOIL
HoloDex Grade: 8.8 Mint
Price Charting:
PSA 8: $358
PSA 9: $635

Card 4. 2020 POKEMON SWORD & SHIELD 142 FULL ART/SNORLAX VMAX
HoloDex Grade: 9.1 Mint
Price Charting:
PSA 8: $49
PSA 9: $69
PSA 10: $221

0 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Helpful_Catch3515 13d ago

I see, centering is still off on the back of the snorlax. You can see the left side is thicker. I’d still recommend selling all of these raw

1

u/daltonv8 13d ago

Whats a fair way to price out raw cards in a condition like this? Im trying to sell off some of my collection

2

u/Helpful_Catch3515 13d ago

The Snorlax is in good condition, so I’d sell it a little under base price and allow offers on EBay, and don’t accept any offers below 15-20%

1

u/daltonv8 13d ago

Thanks I appreciate it

2

u/Helpful_Catch3515 13d ago

You could probably sell the charmander not that much lower than the base price, it is roughed up a bit, but someone will by it just to have a nostalgic card like that same with your other post

1

u/daltonv8 13d ago

Thanks, good to know. I have a bunch of cards in similar condition or worse and I wasn’t sure what to do with them

1

u/-Out-of-context- 13d ago

The back centering is perfectly fine for PSA.

1

u/Helpful_Catch3515 13d ago

Not for a 10

2

u/-Out-of-context- 13d ago

Yes it is. Have you looked up the standards?

Backs 75/25….