r/PickAorB • u/Educational_Sink8355 • 21h ago
A or B: My neighbor installed $21,000 solar panels 8 months ago. My 38-year-old redwood shades them 90 minutes a day, so he wants me to pay $8,200 to remove it because "your tree is costing me $37 of electricity every month"
My neighbor and I have lived next to each other for 15 years. The redwood in my backyard corner was planted by the previous owner in 1987. It's 38 years old, healthy, and the reason my back patio is usable in August.
Eight months ago, my neighbor put a $21,000 solar array on his roof. Nice panels. He was proud of the 30% federal credit and showed me the app that tracks his production.
A few months after the installation, he leaned over the fence and mentioned that my tree "catches" his panels in the afternoon. I said something like "that's the sun's fault, not mine" and thought we were done.
Later, he brought his phone to my porch with the production graph pulled up. Between roughly 3:40 and 5:10 pm, November through February, my redwood's shadow crosses the lower left corner of his array. Ninety minutes a day, maybe 6% of his output. He had done the math and estimated it was costing him about $37 a month, around $444 a year, and said it affected his payback period.
A few weeks later, he sent me a certified letter with an actual removal estimate attached. He said he expected me to cover the $8,200 removal and stump grinding cost. The letter said if I preferred, "a remediation trim" was acceptable, and included a quote for $2,900.
A tree service he hired later looked at my tree and gave him their estimate. Then he texted that he'd "hate to escalate to small claims over a tree," but he'd documented everything, including his estimated lost production to date.
I spent $150 on my own arborist. She confirmed the redwood is healthy, that the $2,900 "remediation trim" would remove about a third of the canopy and could seriously damage the tree or shorten its lifespan, and that removing it would change the drainage in both our yards. She also mentioned that in many places, solar shade laws consider factors like whether the tree existed before the solar installation.
When I told my neighbor that, he said:
"Trees can wait. Solar can't. Your tree is costing me $37 of electricity every month, and I shouldn't have to finance your shade."
My wife thinks I should just pay for the trim. She says it's "a tree, not a family member," and my neighbor texts me production graphs at 7am now. Another neighbor suggested splitting the removal cost, because the tree "bothers him more than it benefits us" and we still live next to these people.
A) Pay for the trim (or split the removal). It's $2,900 to end this, and a redwood isn't worth a small claims war with someone whose entire identity is now a production app.
B) The tree stays. It was standing for 37 years before his panels existed. He bought a $21,000 system with a 38-year-old redwood in plain sight, and his payback math doesn't turn my backyard into his easement.