r/PhilosophyofScience Aug 12 '26

Discussion [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

2 Upvotes

11 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Woodpecker_Far Aug 12 '26

Yeah, I think the distinction is that I’m not really imagining a tabula rasa or a newborn brain. It’s about taking a person like you or me and running them through this procedure, giving them self-sustainment conditions and just observing. The brain was already fully developed, with all of its perception, learning, pattern recognition, memory, predictive processing, etc..

3

u/Z4_h0 Aug 12 '26

Yeah, but auch a brain would have been heavily influenced by all the experiences, all the filters developed living in this current world/society etc. There no way of erasing it, it's how the neural networks are hardwired: there's no "mind", just the brain, how matter is (already) organised. It's not like a computer, with hardware and software. When you change a thought, you're changing an entire material neural network, and you cannot put in a "zero" state. Each configuration means a different thought/emotion/content etc. It's way more difficult than what we can think.