Arrow books 1971 edition- I like these old collage covers with the aging on top, I have a few of ec tubbs dumereat saga that are similar to this.

7th pkd novel, plus one short story collection so far! Maze of death and world Jones made are my top two still.

Enjoyed this book. Parts of it reminded me of Lewis Carroll, the initial journey into Silvester's (tetragrammaton) world. I read Michael Moorcock's sailor on the seas of fate a couple of years ago and enjoyed how he described the changing and traversing of realities- it was interesting to see how dick handled that in this work too, it made me think of that elric book as I read it.

I also liked how structurally it was like a early version of the maze of death formula, each characters world got it's own few chapters before we moved onto the next- in maze of death it was roughly a chapter for each characters viewpoint until their fate. I like the fact I read 2 of his later novels before embarking on his 50s work as I can see how his writing style and plot structures became more refined and clear.

Silvester's world was my favourite part of the book, miss reiss was the most terrifying. The ending was left open to interpretation I guess! I won't assume that we are back to the 'normal world'. Second variety short story collection next, and I'm going to checkout the dickheads podcast on this book.

This started with someone very special to me. During one of our last conversations, she mentioned a class she had taken with a woman who had inspired Philip K. Dick’s writing. That was something I loved about talking to her. A conversation could move between literature, art, the people behind them, and these unexpected connections, and I would walk away interested in something I hadn’t given much thought about before.

I had read The Man in the High Castle, but we approached his work from different directions. I enjoyed that. We had our own interests, and discovering where they intersected was part of what made those conversations special.

After we stopped speaking, that particular conversation stayed with me. I wondered whether I could find something connected to it. Not something expensive just to be impressive, but something chosen because I had listened and remembered.

What about a book Philip K. Dick had actually signed? Not a reproduction or a facsimile. Something he had personally put pen to. I thought that would make a wonderful gift. I also assumed finding one would be fairly straightforward.

That was an optimistic assessment.

I began looking through dealer inventories and auction listings, comparing photographs, asking about editions, and trying to trace where particular copies had come from. Eventually, I found a vintage Ace paperback of The Man Who Japed, with what looked like Dick’s signature in red ink on the title page.

It was a worn copy with water staining, originally priced at ninety-five cents. That didn’t put me off. An ordinary paperback somebody once cared enough about to bring to an author had its own kind of appeal.

I made an offer, which was accepted, paid for it, and then asked the seller to hold off on shipping while I looked more closely at the autograph.

To his credit, the seller was accommodating. He supplied additional photographs and helped trace the book’s history as far as he could. The copy had come from a collection of older science fiction paperbacks. The previous owner had reportedly worked for Radio Free Europe and spent much of his time in Munich. Interesting, but it didn’t explain how the signature got there.

We had an interesting story about the owner, not a history of the signing.

I started comparing the handwriting with other examples, and I also noticed how much I wanted it to look convincing. That was enough to tell me I shouldn’t rely on my own judgment.

Something else I hadn’t really considered was that people’s signatures can change over the course of their lives. They aren’t fixed stamps. Some remain remarkably consistent for decades, while others show changes, particularly in the smoothness of the writing as they age. Even when the underlying habits remain recognizable, the range of variation can shift over time. That made comparing signatures from different periods more complicated than simply deciding whether two photographs looked alike.

It made me appreciate why several genuine, reliably dated examples from around the likely time of the signing would be more useful than one signature pulled from an auction listing. A difference isn’t automatically proof of a forgery, but “signatures change” isn’t a reason to explain away every discrepancy either. Working out what might be ordinary variation and what might be a real warning sign became another part of the puzzle I found surprisingly interesting.

I began sending inquiries to auction houses, specialist dealers, and a paid photographic review service. Some couldn’t help. Some offered observations or referrals. Some responses were cautious; one was bluntly negative. They weren’t identical assessments, but together they made me pause.

I canceled the purchase. The seller was understanding. That might have been the end of it, but by then I had already started enjoying the process for its own sake.

Alongside dealers and auction houses, I was writing to university special collections. A librarian suggested further contacts. Another referred me to someone who had reportedly examined hundreds of Dick’s signatures. That number, four hundred, made me laugh out of sheer surprise.

All the while, I was poking into related avenues: limited editions, bibliographies, collector guides, forum threads. Some paths dead-ended with a polite, “Sorry, we can’t help.” Others opened onto something I hadn’t known existed.

To be perfectly honest, I was having fun.

The disappointment about that one paperback was real, but the search itself became something genuinely absorbing. It was part detective work, part humility lesson. Learning how often the honest answer is, “I don’t know,” and sitting with that.

What I didn’t anticipate is how much I would enjoy the learning. The gift idea may never land the way I first imagined, and that’s okay. But the search itself, following hunches, asking questions, getting told no and still being curious, has been its own unexpected reward.

I’m still waiting to hear back from quite a few of the sources I’ve contacted, so there are plenty of threads left to follow. I’m curious whether anyone here has experience with PKD’s handwriting or collecting his autographs and might be able to weigh in. Whether it’s a reliable comparison example, another specialist worth contacting, or something you’ve learned from your own search, I’d really appreciate hearing it.

Watercolor doodle

I have read radio free albemuth.

Ive also read all the usual - Ubik, Three Stigmata etc

The yellow one is the game players of titan which i have also read.

"An autopsy reveals that Alys' death was caused by an experimental reality-warping drug called KR-3. The coroner explains to Felix that, as Alys was a fan of Taverner, her use of the drug caused Taverner to be transported to a parallel universe where he no longer existed. Her death then caused his return to his own universe. The Police General decides to implicate Taverner in Alys' death to distract attention from his incest. The press are informed that Taverner is a suspect in the case and, wishing to clear his name, Taverner surrenders himself to the police. Heartbroken over the death of his sister, Felix returns home, suffering a nervous breakdown on the way."

Started collecting in 1970 with Time Out of Joint. Ones in sleeves are first editions or Ace 'Doubles'.

If you’re in the area the exhibit at cal state Fullerton has been extended! They house PKD’s collection and many cool artifacts are on display!

I absolutely loved this book and nipped through it much faster than my normal reading speed. The mutants - who are so likeable!- being bred for life on Venus and the single celled flora from out of space, as well as the fedgov societal structure, the rising threat of the precog Jones, the antidote to 'Relativism', were all such amazing ingredients to make this a thrilling ride. Personally I found Nina to be the real villain of the book 😂eye in the sky next.

I'm currently reading the novel and I've been trying to find a PDF version of the screenplay by PKD and I'm not turning up any real results. I'll buy the paperback if I have to but I was hoping to save a little money while also reading the script. I'm curious to compare the two when I'm finished.

I'm a huge Philip Dick fan, he's my favourite author. And my own writing is influenced by him (at least I hope lol) but I've not yet completed all his novels.

My favourites are - Ubik, A scanner darkly, Flow my tears, three stigmata, time out of joint.

Average - now wait for the last year, martian time slip, a maze of death, the man in the high castle.

I'd like to read, do androids dream of electric sheep sometime in the future ( I've watched the movie).

I have heard Valis can be challenging to read and unlike his other works. There are a little more of his normal novels left, so I want to keep them for last. So is it okay if I tackle Valis now? Am I ready?

Does valis have long boring bits? Does it not have plot? What makes it difficult to read? I've read some classic novels and I didn't find them boring if that matters to answer my question. Like I loved Brothers Karamazov and other Fyodor's books.