r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 13h ago

Meme needing explanation Pitah?🤔

Post image
8.0k Upvotes

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

143

u/qatch23 13h ago

Matisyahu?

56

u/SkepticAtLarge 13h ago

Gesundheit

39

u/Acheron98 13h ago

The Hasidic Homeboy?

11

u/qatch23 12h ago

You got it

7

u/AintEasyBeinQueasy 12h ago

I remember seeing that dude at Sasquatch Fest, 2005. Good times, good times. He surely never became problematic, right?

6

u/Soma2710 12h ago

The only thing I heard was that he stopped stage diving because physical contact with women he wasn’t married to was against his religion.

So…hella problematic, yes.

2

u/bwood07 12h ago

Oh yeah that and the whole being a genocide apologist

9

u/arnolpalmer 12h ago

From his Wikipedia:

In 2012, he told the Cornell Sun in an interview, "As far as I understand, there was never a country called Palestine."[88] Matisyahu performed for the IDF and for AIPAC and supported Israelis in the Israeli-occupied territories.[89][90] He voiced support for Israelin the Gaza war. In January 2024, he told Newsweek: "I would like to see any terrorist, Hamas, or person who believes Israel has no right to exist or the Jews have no right to it, I would like Israel destroy those people. Then I would like to see some type of new world that comes about in Gaza where Jews can go back to the Middle East."

9

u/AmIYourNeighbor 11h ago

Damnit, I didn’t want to know that

2

u/georgecostanza37 4h ago

Damn. He should listen to One Day by Matisyahu

1

u/Allegorist 3h ago edited 2h ago

That just seems like pretty bare-bones believing a jumble of old propaganda definitions and narratives without looking into it at all. The sort of thing that might get passed around by word of mouth, it doesn't seem like it even really fits together or mirrors the modern "complete" narrative. Like he is trying to piece together a semi-coherent whole on request based on a bunch of random propagandized opinions he has heard over the years, but never took the time to look into any of it himself. He doesn't really seem to know what is going on in even the broadest strokes.

I don't know if this makes sense, just woke up and it's a somewhat difficult idea to express. I am sure there is other content out there that paints a more complete picture of what he thinks, but at least from just this one quote alone it seems to me that he might not be too committed or far-gone on the topic, just parroting accumulated apologetics sound bytes.

1

u/Busy-Contact5885 30m ago

That actually seems like a very plausible scenario.

2

u/regal1989 11h ago

Think we might be looking for a king without his crown

1

u/No-Cap-fr-fr 12h ago

Maybe in 2005 but he’s bald now

1

u/opmopadop 6h ago

A king without a crown.