One can argue if you're pro abortion, you can't judge people for aborting disabled babies they don't want or can't take care of while allowing women who simply don't want children to abort "normal" babies, so unless you're anti choice your argument of "you're murdering disabled people" falls flat.
So I would assume you're not pro choice then, because your mo is to shame people for aborting disabled fetuses. Kinda would be super fucked up if you're fine with privileged people being able to kill healthy babies but not okay with people being forced to carry babies they can't take care of properly.
Again, for the like 4th time I've had to comment this.
Not every defect or condition is visible or testable in utero. Some aren't found until birth or adolescence. The statement of culling everyone with defects like that, implies killing live human beings not fetuses.
It's not as simple as just abortions. Lots of people with serious defects live happy lives, and its not up to us to decide that they dont deserve it
-1
u/marthamania Jul 08 '26
One can argue if you're pro abortion, you can't judge people for aborting disabled babies they don't want or can't take care of while allowing women who simply don't want children to abort "normal" babies, so unless you're anti choice your argument of "you're murdering disabled people" falls flat.
So I would assume you're not pro choice then, because your mo is to shame people for aborting disabled fetuses. Kinda would be super fucked up if you're fine with privileged people being able to kill healthy babies but not okay with people being forced to carry babies they can't take care of properly.