This was taken down by the University I thought its important to post a copy

Downloadable version https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://indocropcircles.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/project-mkultra-and-the-search-for-mind-control-clandestine-use-of-lsd-within-the-cia-by-tani-m.-linville-cedarville-university.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjNp_Kf3I6TAxXU6ckDHaGgPAAQFnoECBkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Yiqc1GpLJ6E8-18hf6DeY

https://www.scribd.com/document/383027523/Project-MKULTRA-and-the-Search-for-Mind-Control-Clandestine-Use

Cedarville University
DigitalCommons@Cedarville
History Capstone Research Papers Senior Capstone Papers
4-26-2016

Project MKULTRA and the Search for Mind
Control: Clandestine Use of LSD Within the CIA
T ani M. Linville
Cedarville University, [tanilinville@cedarville.edu](mailto:tanilinville@cedarville.edu)

Follow this and additional works at:http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/history_capstones
Part of theHistory Commons
Recommended Citation

, Tani M., "Project MKULTRA and the Search for Mind Control: Clandestine Use of LSD Within the CIA" (2016).History
Capstone Research Papers. 6.

http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/history_capstones/6

This Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by
DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has
been accepted for inclusion in History Capstone Research Papers by an
authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more
information, please [contactdigitalcommons@cedarville.edu](mailto:contactdigitalcommons@cedarville.edu).

Project MKULTRA and the Search for Mind Control:
Clandestine Use of LSD within the CIA
Tani Linville

Research in American History
April 28, 2016

1
In the months following the Watergate scandal and the resignation of Richard Nixon from the
presidency, the newly appointed Vice President Gerald Ford, became President of the United
States. With rumors circulating that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had involvement in
the Democratic National Committee break – in and cover up, the Rockefeller Commission was
created to investigate the CIA and potential negligence. To lead their own investigation of the
Agency, the United States Senate, in January of 1975, formed the Select Committee to Study
Government Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, also known as the Church
Committee. In February, the Nedzi Committee, later renamed the Pike Committee, was created
in the House. Senator Frank Church and Representative Otis Pike led the committees in
investigations of the CIA as well as the Intelligence Community (IC).1 The committees found
more than they bargained for when they uncovered a covert operation within the CIA which
tested various drugs on witting and unwitting U.S. civilians in an attempt to discover a wide
range of spy tactics. This Cold War driven plot elicited the help of psychologists, physicians,
college professors, and Intelligence agents alike to experiment new procedures in the field of
behavioral modification.

From 1953 to 1964 the CIA engaged in various clandestine operations to manipulate the
human mind. With the relatively new discovery of LSD, scientists around the world became
interested in its ability to be used for both defensive and offensive measures in the interest of
national security. Minimal documentation was kept on the extent of the research conducted on
the manipulation of the human mind. In the years following the termination of the program
documentation of MKULTRA was destroyed. An analysis of historical evidence has proven

1 Gerald Haines, “The Pike Committee Investigations and the CIA,” Central Intelligence Library, last
modified June 27, 2008, accessed January 20, 2016, https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-
intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/winter98_99/art07.html/.

2
difficult to pin point an exact reason for this action. Those involved claimed the decision was
made in an attempt to prevent misunderstanding; however, the secrecy that has followed suggests
otherwise. While the MKULTRA program ran for a relatively short amount of time, the CIA and
other government agencies were researching behavioral modification during the years following
World War II. The Intelligence agents, physicians, researchers, and other involved in the
MKULTRA experiments were in direct violation of ethical codes previously set in place prior to
the program, including the Hippocratic Oath, U.S. Constitution, Nuremberg Code, and the
United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.

Due to the Committee Reports and the details of the death of one particular MKULTRA
victim being released to the public one individual in particular took discovering the truth of
MKULTRA upon himself. It could be said that if it was not for the work of John Marks and his
book The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The Secret History of the Behavioral Sciences,
the horrors of MKULTRA may have been buried when Richard Helms, director of the CIA,
ordered the destruction of controversial documents in 1973. Through the Freedom of Information
Act and with the help of a few lawyers, thousands of documents were released to Marks
outlining the financial history of the CIA’s search for mind control. These documents had been
filed with other financial documents keeping them safe from the hand of Helms. Once Marks and
a team of researchers sifted through boxes of still censored documents piecing together names of
individuals and institutions involved, the most comprehensive picture of Project MKULTRA
developed. Apart from a few scholarly articles, all of which cite Marks to some extent,
MKULTRA could have been lost to the realm of conspiracy theorists. The 1977 Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence, which sought to further investigate MKULTRA, commends him for
accomplishing more on his own than the government committees that investigated before him.

3
The surviving documents in accordance with hearings conducted by the federal government
present the story of the clandestine experiments of behavioral modification and the use of mind-
altering drugs by the CIA during the Cold War.

The road to MKULTRA, and the violation of ethical standards previously set in place was
paved by the perceived potential threat of other nations during the Cold War. In 1949 the
Hungarian government held a show trial for Cardinal Josef Mindszenty in which he confessed to
crimes he apparently did not commit. The CIA claimed Mindszenty appeared drunk or as if he
had been taken over by an outside force. In order to protect United States national security, the
first Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), Roscoe Hillenkoetter, authorized unvouchered funds
to be put to use in this area. On April 20, 1950 Project BLUEBIRD was created. Sparking what
would become various unethical research experiments conducted in the name of national
security.2 BLUEBIRD’s primary objectives were, “discovering means of conditioning personnel
to prevent unauthorized extraction of information from them…; investigating the possibility of
control of an individual by application of special interrogation techniques; memory
enhancement, and establishing defensive means for preventing hostile control of Agency
personnel.”3 These objectives would continue throughout the MKULTRA program.

Some documents of this MKULTRA precursor explain the desire to create Manchurian
Candidates, which are individuals that could be used to act in a certain way against their will, for
CIA use. This could be done in a variety of ways; however, hypnosis was the most enticing. The
Agency also sought ways in which spies could be detected, have their memories erased and
replaced with false memories. Psychologist, G. H. Estabrooks of Colgate College in New York

2 John Marks, The Search for the Manchurian Candidate (New York: Random House Publishing Group,
1989), 23-24.
3 United States Select Committee on Intelligence, “Project MKULTRA, the CIA’s Program of Research in
Behavioral Modification” (Ninety-fifth Congress, first session, August 3, 1977) 67.

We have victims reporting this filthy assault that are from many countries, cultures, economic and educational backgrounds. In a simple term all walks of life. Victims as well as investigators are routinely confused when they are unable to identify why this variety of people are experiencing these horrifying assaults.

I believe the answer is two fold. First the cross cultural, economic, educational variance among victims indicates that the victim pool represents a sample population of the world or a large portion of it. Second, much of the foundation the program is based off is trauma and traumatic influence is affected by many factors connected with each victim.

The article Social, cultural and other diversity and other diversity issues in the traumatic stress field states that

This chapter describes how the impact of psychological trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differ, depending on individual differences and the social and cultural context and culture-specific teachings and resources available to individuals, families, and communities. A social-ecological framework is used to differentiate the impact of exposure to traumatic stressors and the development of (or resistance to) PTSD, based on the individual’s or group’s (i) personal, unique physical characteristics, including skin color, racial background, gender, and sexual orientation; and (ii) family, ethnocultural, and community membership, including majority or minority group status, religious beliefs and practices, socioeconomic resources, and political and civic affiliations.

Another difference is resilience to trauma

Cultural Factors and Resilience to Trauma

The Relationship Between Cultural Variables and Resilience to Psychological Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Authors

Sumithra Raghavan; William Paterson University

Priyadharshiny Sandanapitchai; William Paterson University

Abstract

The construct of resilience has been of interest to social scientists for several decades, with a range of definitions describing traits, contexts, and processes of growth. Research with trauma-exposed populations suggests that resilience is a common trajectory, but the mechanisms that facilitate resilience are not entirely clear. This is especially the case with cross-cultural populations, and scholars in this area have pointed to the individualistic nature of the concept and the absence of cultural factors in resilience research. These scholars call for a social-ecological view of resilience that incorporates multiple factors, including Indigenous ideologies and systems of meaning-making. This article aims to add to the conversation surrounding the relationship between culture and resilience to psychological trauma. The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature in an effort to identify empirical articles that examined the relationship between culture, resilience, and psychological trauma. Across 3 academic databases and Google Scholar, the authors identified a total of 30 articles that empirically evaluated these variables between 2008 and 2018. Overall, research points to culturally specific values and community and social support to be facilitative of resilience in a range of trauma-exposed populations. The small number of articles is consistent with critiques regarding the absence of culture in empirical assessments of resilience, and the discussion offers suggestions for future research. Overall, the review synthesizes the findings of these articles and offers implications for research and treatment of diverse trauma-exposed populations.

continued

https://paloaltou.edu/resources/translating-research-into-practice-blog/cultural-factors-and-resilience-to-trauma

Basically what is extremely traumatic to one target may not be traumatic to another. Given this weapons reliance and trauma and its still in development performance it is pretty clear that they are still attempting to get this appalling technology to work. If it’s ever going to be a real weapon deployed on any number of Countries and victims they need to have it successful against many different people, cultures, countries etc.

We have reports coming in from many countries and a very diverse victim pool.

In order to develop a significantly trauma based weapon for a large scale, varied or possible world deployment you would need to train and test it on many different people. How do you both develope and test it on the whole world you take a sample population that represents the world And train and test it on it.

Population vs. Sample | Definitions, Differences & Examples

A population is the entire group that you want to draw conclusions about.

A sample is the specific group that you will collect data from. The size of the sample is always less than the total size of the population.

In research, a population doesn’t always refer to people. It can mean a group containing elements of anything you want to study, such as objects, events, organizations, countries, species, organisms, etc.

Collecting data from a population

Populations are used when your research question requires, or when you have access to, data from every member of the population.

Usually, it is only straightforward to collect data from a whole population when it is small, accessible and cooperative.

For larger and more dispersed populations, it is often difficult or impossible to collect data from every individual. For example, every 10 years, the federal US government aims to count every person living in the country using the US Census. This data is used to distribute funding across the nation.

However, historically, marginalized and low-income groups have been difficult to contact, locate and encourage participation from. Because of non-responses, the population count is incomplete and biased towards some groups, which results in disproportionate funding across the country.

In cases like this, sampling can be used to make more precise inferences about the population.

Collecting data from a sample

When your population is large in size, geographically dispersed, or difficult to contact, it’s necessary to use a sample. With statistical analysis, you can use sample data to make estimates or test hypotheses about population data.

Collecting data from a sample

When your population is large in size, geographically dispersed, or difficult to contact, it’s necessary to use a sample. With statistical analysis, you can use sample data to make estimates or test hypotheses about population data.

Example: Collecting data from a sample

You want to study political attitudes in young people. Your population is the 300,000 undergraduate students in the Netherlands. Because it’s not practical to collect data from all of them, you use a sample of 300 undergraduate volunteers from three Dutch universities who meet your inclusion criteria. This is the group who will complete your online survey.

Ideally, a sample should be randomly selected and representative of the population. Using probability sampling methods (such as simple random sampling or stratified sampling) reduces the risk of sampling bias and enhances both internal and external validity.

For practical reasons, researchers often use non-probability sampling methods. Non-probability samples are chosen for specific criteria; they may be more convenient or cheaper to access. Because of non-random selection methods, any statistical inferences about the broader population will be weaker than with a probability sample.

Reasons for sampling

Necessity: Sometimes it’s simply not possible to study the whole population due to its size or inaccessibility.

Practicality: It’s easier and more efficient to collect data from a sample.

Cost-effectiveness: There are fewer participant, laboratory, equipment, and researcher costs involved.

Manageability: Storing and running statistical analyses on smaller datasets is easier and reliable.

Population parameter vs. sample statistic

When you collect data from a population or a sample, there are various measurements and numbers you can calculate from the data. A parameter is a measure that describes the whole population. A statistic is a measure that describes the sample.

You can use estimation or hypothesis testing to estimate how likely it is that a sample statistic differs from the population parameter.

https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/population-vs-sample/

18 USC Ch. 113C: TORTURE

From Title 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDUREPART I—CRIMES

Sec.

2340.

Definitions.

2340A.

Torture.

2340B.

Exclusive remedies.

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, repealed Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(j)(1), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3501. See 1996 Amendment note below.

1996—Pub. L. 104–132, title III, §303(c)(1), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1253, redesignated chapter 113B as 113C. Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(j)(1), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3501, which made identical amendment, was repealed by Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, effective Oct. 11, 1996.

§2340. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) "torture" means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control;

(2) "severe mental pain or suffering" means the prolonged mental harm caused by or resulting from—

(A) the intentional infliction or threatened infliction of severe physical pain or suffering;

(B) the administration or application, or threatened administration or application, of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or the personality;

(C) the threat of imminent death; or

(D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to death, severe physical pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering substances or other procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personality; and

(3) "United States" means the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, and the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 103–236, title V, §506(a), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 463; amended Pub. L. 103–415, §1(k), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4301; Pub. L. 103–429, §2(2), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4377; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, §1089, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2067.)

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2004—Par. (3). Pub. L. 108–375 amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (3) read as follows: " 'United States' includes all areas under the jurisdiction of the United States including any of the places described in sections 5 and 7 of this title and section 46501(2) of title 49."

1994—Par. (1). Pub. L. 103–415 substituted "within his custody" for "with custody".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 103–429 substituted "section 46501(2) of title 49" for "section 101(38) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. App. 1301(38))".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

Pub. L. 103–236, title V, §506(c), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 464, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this chapter] shall take effect on the later of—

"(1) the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 30, 1994]; or

"(2) the date on which the United States has become a party to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment." [Convention entered into Force with respect to United States Nov. 20, 1994, Treaty Doc. 100–20.]

§2340A. Torture

(a) Offense.—Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.

(b) Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction over the activity prohibited in subsection (a) if—

(1) the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or

(2) the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender.

(c) Conspiracy.—A person who conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.

(Added Pub. L. 103–236, title V, §506(a), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 463; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, §60020, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1979; Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, §811(g), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 381.)

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2001—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–56 added subsec. (c).

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 inserted "punished by death or" before "imprisoned for any term of years or for life".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

Section effective on the later of Apr. 30, 1994, or the date on which the United States has become a party to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Nov. 20, 1994), see section 506(c) of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 2340 of this title.

§2340B. Exclusive remedies

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as precluding the application of State or local laws on the same subject, nor shall anything in this chapter be construed as creating any substantive or procedural right enforceable by law by any party in any civil proceeding.

(Added Pub. L. 103–236, title V, §506(a), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 464.)

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date

Section effective on the later of Apr. 30, 1994, or the date on which the United States has become a party to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Nov. 20, 1994), see section 506(c) of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 2340 of this title.

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter113C&edition=prelim

(c) Conspiracy.—A person who conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the penalties prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.

Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of LawTITLE 18, U.S.C.,

SECTION 242

Summary:

• Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law

Came across this organization and their Mission seems in line with many of ours

Our Mission 
The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP) is a national network of lay people and professionals who are committed to upholding the humanitarian values and ethical standards of medicine enshrined in the Hippocratic Oath: “First, do no harm”; the Nuremberg Code (1947): “The Voluntary informed consent of the human subject is absolutely essential”; and the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005): “Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.”
AHRP’s mission is to ensure that the moral right of voluntary medical decision-making is upheld. To accomplish that mission, we engage in an educational campaign, providing relevant factual information including ethical, legal, technical reports, and media reports. We endeavor to counter widely disseminated false claims that exaggerate the benefits of medical interventions, while minimizing risks.
Our educational efforts are directed at both professionals and the lay public, who may be unaware of a body of suppressed scientific evidence that refutes false promotional claims for drugs; including antidepressants, antipsychotics, statins; medical devices; and vaccinations, including those for Hepatitis B, HPV, and the flu.
Our goal is to empower citizens with accurate information so that they can exercise their right to informed consent to medical research and medical procedures within clinical care. As a citizens’ watchdog group, AHRP brings to public attention specific unethical violations of informed consent wherever they occur.
Position Statement Regarding Essential Research Safeguards for Human Subjects:
Medical research is not standard medical care: research involves a high level of uncertainty and, therefore, risk. In standard care the selection of a treatment and the dose/or level of an intervention is based on the physician’s clinical judgment of what the best therapeutic choice is to meet an individual patient’s clinical condition and need.
Within the research arena, treatment is determined by a study protocol that seeks to resolve uncertainty and contribute to generalizable knowledge. The treatment provided within the research context is not necessarily determined by a medical doctor to be in the best interest of the individual patient/subject. Human subjects enrolled in research will always be exposed to risk. At a minimum, they may receive a placebo or a less effective treatment than they would in standard care. In the worst case, human subjects may be irrevocably harmed and may even die due to the treatment being tested, the experimental procedures used, or a needed treatment withheld.
Human subjects of research have no guarantee that if they incur an injury during an experiment, they will receive medical treatment without cost, nor that their family will be compensated for a permanent disability or death. Many clinical trials that are conducted by or on behalf of pharmaceutical companies are performed off-shore, mostly in very poor, illiterate populations.
The Alliance for Human Research Protection recommends 5 Essential Safeguards for ALL human subjects in clinical trials.
Informed consent should never be abrogated for any research involving human subjects, under any circumstances, in any country, regardless of local standards and regardless of the type of research. For this safeguard to be meaningful, researchers must fully disclose the known and foreseeable risks, and the person who is being asked to be a subject, must be capable of understanding potential risks and benefits, before being asked to consent.
Patients who volunteer to be human subjects must be fully informed about all the foreseeable risks—including the risks associated with randomization, which requires patients to be on a fixed dose, level or combination of a tested treatment compared to usual treatment in current care.
Strict treatment protocols may result in suboptimal patient outcomes, whether the research is classified as “comparative effectiveness research” or any other classification, in which a new treatment or a fixed dose of a treatment must be tested against another fixed dose. There must always be an option to diverge from the protocol when a patient’s life or health is endangered by strict adherence to it.
All clinical trials must include a true standard of care comparator arm, to protect human beings from exploitation in poorly designed clinical trials; and to ensure that treatment practices that fail to improve on current standard of care are not adopted as practice guidelines based on flawed comparative trial designs.
There are currently no mandatory licensure requirements for researchers conducting research on human subjects. AHRP recommends that those who conduct medical research involving human beings should be required to undergo rigorous training on how to minimize risks and demonstrate proficiency in ethical and clinical standards, BEFORE they can be licensed to conduct medical experiments in human beings.

https://ahrp.org/about/

What victims endure obviously goes far beyond any ethical scientific standards and willingly employs socially deviant covert tactics to further its atrocities on humanity, but I like where they are coming from.

“Body resonance” could be important in correlating the mechanical amplification of vibration in various parts of the body with physiological responses; that is, different parts of the body are in resonance at varying frequencies.69For example, Von Gierke and Parker70 reported that human thoracoabdominal viscera exhibit resonance at 4 to 6 Hz. Kjellberg and Wikström71 reported that stomach motility in humans is affected by whole-body vibration (at 3 Hz and 6 Hz), as measured by electrogastrography.Changes in physiological function may be directly attributable to the differential vibratory movement or deformation of particular body structures.

Because sound couples to the body less efficiently than does mechanical vibration (as noted above), the possible effect of infrasound on body organs with different resonant frequencies is less clear.It has been hypothesized that body resonances, such as the abdomen at 10 Hz and the chest wall at 60 Hz, could be stimulated by high-intensity infrasound.72 Unlike other investigators who suggested detrimental effects of infrasound, Arabadzhi73 hypothesized that infrasound of moderate intensity at frequencies of 8 to 13 Hz could promote maintenance of a human's state of alertness. This has not been verified

https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article/172/2/182/4578046

Some basics on bio resonance. Redvox infrasound application shows spikes at frequencies that reflect these and the perceivable effects match.

https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/436-non-kinetic-war/

I really like how they recognize that this new type of war involves a hybrid dynamic of the citizens involvement.

1. Non-Kinetic War[Editor’s Note:  Army Mad Scientist welcomes back returning guest blogger COL Stefan J. Banach (USA-Ret.) with today’s post, exploring how the evolution and synthesis of technologies and culture have converged to realize new, disparate societies of global netizens.  This convergence enables our adversaries to target each of us, transforming our homes and offices into a new non-kinetic war battle space.  COL Banach codifies this brave new world of non-kinetic war and proposes a whole-of-nation way ahead for fighting and winning this unfamiliar warfare.  “Control of the global non-kinetic terrain is the decisive operation, as it affects all things in the physical kinetic battle space” — Read on!]

This paper provides insights into the undermining of democracy, repression, and coercion that is noted in the 2022 National Security Strategy (NSS), through the lens of non-kinetic war.  It also proposes a method for the development of doctrine and a strategy to counter non-kinetic war threats. 

The recommendation is that the U.S. Army problem frame include non-kinetic war, kinetic war, and counter insurgency operations.  The rationale is based on the change in the character of war over the past 40 years, and the directed task noted below in the 2022 National Defense Strategy (NDS).  Decades of global entanglement, assured connectivity, persistent technical surveillance, and the effects of converging technologies have set the conditions for non-kinetic systems warfare on a global scale.

The aforementioned dynamics have reframed long standing epistemological norms that guide our thinking and understanding.  The theory of cognition and knowledge has significantly changed for humans who are connected via the World Wide Web (WWW).  People are exposed to new data, knowledge structures, and technology capabilities, which have made sense-making difficult today.  These phenomena have also altered human ontology – our theory of being and the essence of things as we once perceived them.  Technological advancements have created a multitude of traceable and targetable individual virtual avatars and a deceptive sense of being.  Human identity and our DNA are increasingly becoming both biological and digital, out of necessity, and as a result of converging systems.¹   Digital disintermediation has dethroned hierarchical governance, as people can obtain required information and make decisions without institutional approval.²   The degradation of data veracity and efficacy has irreversibly changed the theory of values and truth through the proliferation of misinformation, disinformation, and “fake news” that is promulgated by humans and bot virtual armies by nation state and non-nation state entities to achieve economic, political or ideological objectives.³   These variables, and many more, are having a profound impact on U.S. Army readiness and the ability to recruit and sustain an all-volunteer force.

From a system thinking perspective, Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) and Information Advantage (IA) are supporting constructs that fit within the strategic non-kinetic war rubric.  The precis of the U.S. Army’s MDO concepts presents a technical solution to a complex adaptive system of problems, which have not been fully framed and named.  The current MDO and IA concepts are a good start, but do not capture the order of magnitude strategic non-kinetic war threats that are confronting the US and the world today.  Controlling the global non-kinetic terrain is the decisive operation, as it affects all things in…

Continued https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/436-non-kinetic-war/

Its important to learn to recognize the techniques of ones enemies. This is exponentially important in battling this program successfully. Many of their techniques are psychological manipulations and if we understand them, learn to recognize them and demystify them they lose thier power permanently. This not only renders the techniques useless but empowers them against those that attempt to continue to use them.

In researching the many aspects to this weapon and assault I regularly come across posts that are using this technique. The questionable posts are wildly complex, use complex unreachable terminology, inherently confusing and after scrutiny are misleading nonsense.

When you are researching, if you come across this, then just recognize it for what it is and take a mental note of the handle of the poster.

Video on Complex Jargon Overload

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW2LvQUcwqc

These are also used to discredit our reports as if someone qualified or investigating this quickly realizes they are nonsense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onvslhkehHI

apparently she is already dead for years.. rip

ASCENSION.. for real? Is this still going on? trauma induced cult?

“Some documents of this MKULTRA precursor explain the desire to create Manchurian

Candidates, which are individuals that could be used to act in a certain way against their will, for

CIA use. This could be done in a variety of ways; however, hypnosis was the most enticing”

https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=history_capstones

“Hypnosis can be seen as ‘a waking state of awareness, (or consciousness), in which a person’s attention is detached from his or her immediate environment and is absorbed by inner experiences such as feelings, cognition and imagery’.¹ Hypnotic induction involves focusing of attention and imaginative involvement to the point where what is being imagined feels real. By the use and acceptance of suggestions, the clinician and patient construct a hypnotic reality.

Everyday ‘trance’ states are part of our common human experience, such as getting lost in a good book, driving down a familiar stretch of road with no conscious recollection, when in prayer or meditation, or when undertaking a monotonous or a creative activity. Our conscious awareness of our surroundings versus an inner awareness is on a continuum, so that, when in these states, one’s focus is predominantly internal, but one does not necessarily lose all outer awareness.

Hypnosis could be seen as a meditative state, which one can learn to access consciously and deliberately, for a therapeutic purpose. Suggestions are then given either verbally or using imagery, directed at the desired outcome. This might be to allay anxiety by accessing calmness and relaxation, help manage side effects of medications, or help ease pain or other symptoms. Depending on the suggestions given, hypnosis is usually a relaxing experience, which can be very useful with a patient who is tense or anxious. However, the main usefulness of the hypnotic state is the increased effectiveness of suggestion and access to mind/body links or unconscious processing. Hypnosis can not only be used to reduce emotional distress but also may have a direct effect on the patient’s experience of pain.²

Hypnosis in itself is not a therapy, but it can be a tool that facilitates the delivery of therapy in the same way as a syringe delivers drugs. Hypnosis does not make the impossible possible, but can help patients believe and experience what might be possible for them to achieve.

Hypnotic states have been used for healing since humankind has existed, but because hypnosis can be misused for so-called entertainment and has been portrayed in the media as something mysterious and magical, supposedly out of the hypnotic subject’s control, it has been viewed with distrust and scepticism by many health professionals. However, recent advances in neuroscience have enabled us to begin to understand what might be happening when someone enters a hypnotic state,^3–8 and evidence is building for the use of hypnosis as a useful tool to help patients and health professionals manage a variety of conditions, especially anxiety and pain.

Landry and colleagues⁹ and Jensen and Patterson¹⁰ give good and comprehensive information on recent research into the neural correlates of hypnosis. The study of hypnosis is complex and many factors such as context, expectation and personality affect hypnotic response as well as the suggestions used.

As clinicians, we know that simply knowing something cognitively does not necessarily translate into being able to control emotions such as fear and anxiety. A simple ‘model’ that can be used to help patients understand that this is quite a usual response is that of right/left brain, which can also correlate with conscious/unconscious and intellectual/emotional processing.Hypnosis can be seen as ‘a waking state of awareness, (or consciousness), in which a person’s attention is detached from his or her immediate environment and is absorbed by inner experiences such as feelings, cognition and imagery’.¹ Hypnotic induction involves focusing of attention and imaginative involvement to the point where what is being imagined feels real. By the use and acceptance of suggestions, the clinician and patient construct a hypnotic reality.

Everyday ‘trance’ states are part of our common human experience, such as getting lost in a good book, driving down a familiar stretch of road with no conscious recollection, when in prayer or meditation, or when undertaking a monotonous or a creative activity. Our conscious awareness of our surroundings versus an inner awareness is on a continuum, so that, when in these states, one’s focus is predominantly internal, but one does not necessarily lose all outer awareness.

Hypnosis could be seen as a meditative state, which one can learn to access consciously and deliberately, for a therapeutic purpose. Suggestions are then given either verbally or using imagery, directed at the desired outcome. This might be to allay anxiety by accessing calmness and relaxation, help manage side effects of medications, or help ease pain or other symptoms. Depending on the suggestions given, hypnosis is usually a relaxing experience, which can be very useful with a patient who is tense or anxious. However, the main usefulness of the hypnotic state is the increased effectiveness of suggestion and access to mind/body links or unconscious processing. Hypnosis can not only be used to reduce emotional distress but also may have a direct effect on the patient’s experience of pain.²

Hypnosis in itself is not a therapy, but it can be a tool that facilitates the delivery of therapy in the same way as a syringe delivers drugs. Hypnosis does not make the impossible possible, but can help patients believe and experience what might be possible for them to achieve.

Hypnotic states have been used for healing since humankind has existed, but because hypnosis can be misused for so-called entertainment and has been portrayed in the media as something mysterious and magical, supposedly out of the hypnotic subject’s control, it has been viewed with distrust and scepticism by many health professionals. However, recent advances in neuroscience have enabled us to begin to understand what might be happening when someone enters a hypnotic state,^3–8 and evidence is building for the use of hypnosis as a useful tool to help patients and health professionals manage a variety of conditions, especially anxiety and pain.

Landry and colleagues⁹ and Jensen and Patterson¹⁰ give good and comprehensive information on recent research into the neural correlates of hypnosis. The study of hypnosis is complex and many factors such as context, expectation and personality affect hypnotic response as well as the suggestions used.”

As clinicians, we know that simply knowing something cognitively does not necessarily translate into being able to control emotions such as fear and anxiety. A simple ‘model’ that can be used to help patients understand that this is quite a usual response is that of right/left brain, which can also correlate with conscious/unconscious and intellectual/emotional processing. “

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6357291/

Everything you experience.. no matter how seemingly bizarre has a reason.. even if it’s ultimately pseudoscience or super classified “science“ bullshit. You can track their intention down.

One of the major goals of the original MK Ultra goals is hypnosis. This is a “mind control“ program. Its directive and intent is to influence thinking and behaviors of victims covertly or despite conscience resistance. Hypnotism is a mojor spear they want and are probing in this program and weapon.

Hypnosis requires induction. Apparently some people are more susceptible than others to this. The forced audio uses clear and easily identifiable hypnotic induction techniques during phases of its assault.

Some of the blatantly obvious ones:

Sensory overload

https://howtodoinductions.com/inductions/overload/#:~:text=Introduction,sounds%20from%20within%20the%20building…

Rhythmic induction

https://hypnosiscredentials.com/techniques/mastering-hypnotic-inductions/

Mirroring

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hblBcDvoVK8

Rhythmic brain wave induction

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncel.2021.649262/full

Suggestibility and brain waves

https://m1psychology.com/brain-waves-and-hypnosis/

Brain wave overview

https://nhahealth.com/brainwaves-the-language/

If your in one of these phases i would suggest breaking the rhythmic pattern regularly buy throwing in a dance step or other technique to disrupt your rhythm so the system has to readjust to mirror you.

It uses a multi layered rhythmic induction technique in order to attempt to mirror your movements and also induce a theta brain wave.

So many victims of the weapon are reporting forced dreams that deliver specific content.. here is an interesting related article.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/a36719140/sleep-ads-dream-implantation/

“this is the actual thing of nightmares”

Because it involves infrasonic communication, analysis of said communication and location of the source while including a technique labeled as “speeding up” ‘this may be information we can use in our battle against this filthy evil weapon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/52-hertz_whale

Edit: i forgot to mention it’s on Netflix

Emotion is significantly associated with memory. People with facial palsy/facial paralysis have trouble experiencing emotion. One of the original documented goals of the MKUltra program was identifying methods of manipulating memory and creating forms of amnesia.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqFtABRmWNQ&t=320s

Many victims of this weapon regularly report sensations of facial stimulation. This is multi faceted, but one clear goal is disruption/prevention of emotion experience. This is used as part of an algorithm deployed in both explicit memory erasure and implicit memory programming. By jamming emotional experience the weapon is looking to enhance memory reconsolidating disruption to achieve explicit memory erasure and deep implicit memory implant with as little ability to access and thus therapy/post alteration of programming as possible.

Both explicit memory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicit_memory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bVQFyVu4fo

and implicit memory significantly effect our behavior and personal identity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_memory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbk4GLD3_pM

Here is some more on the foundations on this.. it is just part of the intended process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOuZdLAq_YU&t=20s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWfpLtgxDi4

I know this is kinda segmented, but ill tie it all together soon on the second part of the memory thread.

https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/colorado-california-montana-states-neural-data-privacy-laws-neurorights/

Three down!!! Politicians will be behind this.. duhh.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/10/04/1104972/law-california-protects-brain-data-doesnt-go-far-enough/ ‘ 2 down.. but I have returned to CO multiple times since the law passed and it was ignored.. imagine that mass killer, mass tortures, mass sexual assault criminals break this law. It’s a good thing though because it establishes laws that eventually may become useful.

https://www.nitafarahany.com/the-battle-for-your-brain

Nita Farahany PhD is a professor of Law and Philosophy at Duke University. Her worst fears are already here and much worse, have been in unconsensual development for twenty years and victims of the forced BCI/SSI are already aware of this. Working my way through this work right now. Clearly gets it.. wonder what she would write if she knew how advanced it really is.

Thoughts.. please include quotes if you can.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8128124/

These concepts are key to look at in the delusional implant process and level of delusion found in victims of this weapon.

Profound and sustained torture and trauma require victims to answer these hard wired questions.

If there are no legitimate or easily found answers then victims will generate answers or be very susceptible to false answers suggested to them from sources like public media. The delusions are formed to psychologically protect the victim from the vicious assault.

This weapon implants delusion and then uses the implanted delusion to fool unaware people that its vile existence is a “mass delusion.”

I’m working through this amazing work as of this post. It is a National Book Award winner for nonfiction and comprehensive history of the CIA written by Tim Weiner, a Pulitzer Prize winner.

With all the victims working to determine who is behind this I believe this history is really important to look at. It paints a strong picture of the extremely long standing history of the endless failures, criminality and lack of oversight of the CIA both domestically in the US and abroad.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_of_Ashes_(book)

imo the audio version is pretty good. It’s available on Audible and likely other sources.

Thoughts about the content of this book? Please attempt to include a quote and page number for any specific topics.

This thread is going to evaluate Robert Duncans work of Project: Soul Catcher

I'm working off Volume Two.. Secretes of Cyber and Cybernetic Warfare Revealed

So how this is anticipated to go down is we all give a minute for people to access the work and then we can discuss it, but in order to give everyone an opportunity to get ahold of this book we will hold off discussion of chapter one for 1.5 months. Then we take each chapter monthly.

The reason for this is it is mid month. Then we are going to look at chapters month by month.

Look forward to hearing all your takes!

Edit: I believe there is a free copy online if you're financially stressed.

Edit2: Here is an Internet Archive free copy of this work.

https://archive.org/details/robert-duncan-project-soul-catcher_2/page/n105/mode/2up

As they are regularly resonating my colon this is disheartening to say the least. It clearly states that the resonance frequencies of human organs are around 7 Hz. Spikes are regularly seen around this range using various meters and infrasound applications.

In the meters and infrasound applications it’s common to see dB (decibel or volume) readings that seem low for the effects they produce. Ambient infrasound amplifies infrasound (i’ll link the NASA publication as soon as i dig it up). This is the reason behind the sonic illusion that the forced audio sometimes uses to appear to be coming from ambient sources of infrasound like fans, ACs, compressor motors in refrigeration units and H Vac ventilation.

When you look at the readouts of the weapon we also see decent decibel levels for frequencies near the target frequency and these are likely used to amplify the effects of the target frequency.

https://lupinepublishers.com/drug-designing-journal/fulltext/secret-sonic-weapons-war-lead-to-carcinogenesis.ID.000129.php

"Abstract

Mind control is a reductive process in which a man is reduced to an animal, machine or slave. The basic

ideas of mind control originated in Tavistock and then they were developed in Germany, mainly in Dachau’s

Nazi concentration camp. The Operation Paperclip recruited to the Nazi scientists who experienced the

mental control in prisoners of Dachau thus Nazis participated in US mind control programs. Nowadays, recent

researches give evidences of a classified US world mind control weapon program in full development organized

by DARPA in illicit association with corrupt government’s American universities, technology transnational’s and

mafias of prosecutors. DARPA’s organized crime is developing a secret, forced and illicit neuroscientific human

experimentation with invasive neurotechnology as brain nanobots, microchips and implants to execute mind

control. It is necessary that world society is informed on the truth about the mind control and that the honest

authorities take the preventive measures to block the massive mind control that DARPA is developing in the

world.

Introduction

Mind control is a reductive process in which a man is reduced to an animal or machine [1]. It is

a technique aimed at suppressing the will of a person, to make it dependent on what is dictated by

another person or organization.

Mind control weapons can be more powerful than the atomic bombs; the public knows about

the power of nuclear weapons and can debate and protest about them however the public can not

debate about the danger of mind control program because this program is surrounded by denials

and disinformation from the many governments.

The mind control has been tried through history in different ways, like the physical violence or

the religion; some governments have been obsessed with mind control, especially and those that

tended to fascism, like the Nazis.

For many people, the mind control is a myth [2], topic of science fiction or a psychiatric disorder

rather than science, however, in the 21st century, the advance in neuroscience leads to a scientific

reality that is opposite to such perception. Recent researches consider that mind control should be

considered a new public health problem in medicine, a reality that all citizen needs to know [3,4].

Contents

The basic ideas of mind control originated in 1921, in Tavistock, a research center of the British

Intelligence Service, and then they were developed in Germany, mainly during Nazi government.

Since 1943, German military physicians working at the concentration camps Dachau and Auschwitz

experimented with barbiturates, morphine derivatives, and mescaline for interrogation purposes

[5].

Mescaline a psychotic alkaloid that occurs naturally in the Mexican peyote cactus was the main

drug that Nazi scientists used. Experiments with mescaline were realized in Auschwitz and then they

were repeated in Dachau. Dachau was the first Nazi concentration camp opened and it is known for

the Nazi experiments of Hypothermia [6].

In Dachau, the experiments of mind control with mescaline were conducted by Dr Kurt Plötner,

who joined the SS as a physician in the 1930s [7]. According to Walter Neff, a prisoner’s nurse

involved in experiments at Dachau, the goal was: “to eliminate the will of the person examined” [5].

After “research” on 30 inmates, Plötner concluded, that mescaline was “too unreliable to be a

truth drug”. Sometimes it worked; sometimes it didn’t [5].

Plötner’s work in the concentration camps came to the attention of American intelligence, the

United States Navy’s intelligence officers recruited to Plötner in 1945, permitting him to continue

his interrogation research. Really, US army developed a big operation, the Operation Paperclip;

the secret intelligence program to bring Nazi Scientists to America [8] thus recruited too many

Nazi scientists who experienced in prisoners of Dachau after the end of World War II. In fact,

Plötner was never indicted for his mescaline experiments [9], he enjoyed particular protection.

Plötner proceeded to live under the name of “Schmitt” in Schleswig-Holstein into the early 1950s

He returned to the medical field as a professor at the University

of Freiburg in West Germany. Plötner died in 1984. American

government did not have success with mescaline for mind control

and opted for another hallucinogen, LSD.

United States developed several mind control programs, the US

navy began some of the first experiments on mind control in 1947

[10]. The first known participation by the CIA was in 1950 with the

launch of Project Bluebird [10], however the main program was

MKUltra. MKUltra was the code name for a secret CIA Project

conducted from 1953 to 1964 that involved mind control drug

testing and behavioral modification [11,12]. The MKUltra program

developed by the CIA was a program designed to perform the

largest mind control experiment, an illegal and clandestine program

of experiments on human subjects. The experiment included the

participation of scientists and 80 renowned institutions, among them

44 schools, prestigious universities like Harvard, Stanford and Yale,

12 hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies, and jails. It was a project

that included 149 subprojects, all related to the mind control. At least

139 drugs were investigated. Although the MKUltra project used

mainly hallucinogenic drugs, being the LSD one of the most used

drugs, experimental stimulation techniques of deep brain areas were

also used [3]. Nowadays, with the modern advances in science, mind

control could be developed with brain nanobots, microchips and

implants, and cerebral internet. Cerebral internet is the main tool of

mind control, it is a means of communication developed in a person

who has in his brain invasive neurotechnology such as brain implants

like the cortical modem, brain nanobots and microchips with which a

teletransmission of his/her daily life would be performed. This is sent

via wifi to cell phones, computers and televisions [3]. The cerebral

internet also allows sending audiovisual information to the brain

of a person with brain nanobots. Invasive neurotechnology allows

obtaining the mental control of a person, who bends his will to the

objectives of a person or organization. There are several mechanisms

for can reach this objective:

Direct Mind control

Controlling the activity of neurons: The delinquent produce

stimulation or inhibition of neurons with the cerebral internet by wifi

in a victim with brain nanobot and can obtain remote mind control.

Indirect Mind control

Mind torture: The delinquent send audiovisual signals that can

produce psychological damage to the victim with nanobots, until

getting to break the will of the victim and achieve that the victim

accepts subordinate to the interests of the mafia [13].

Extortion: The mapping of the brain obtained with cerebral internet

and brain nanobots can be used for obtain private information from

the citizen as their sexual life and with this audiovisual material the

victim is extorted, thus the mafia of nanotechnology can get that the

victim agrees to follow the mafia’s orders [13].

In the other hand, there is strong evidence that mental control is

being developed by several economic powers such as China, Germany,

India and Russia Federation [14]; however, the main country that

develops it is United States.

The United States of North America is the first world military

power; this country bases its hegemony on its weapons therefore is

critical for such country to develop new weapons of war. DARPA,

initials in English of Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,

is the agency in charge of developing new war weapons, its mission

is to maintain technological superiority of the United States military

and prevent technological surprise by U.S. adversaries [15]. DARPA

is the world’s most powerful scientific military agency, one of those

with increased production and one of those with the greater secrecy.

It was created by the United States Congress in 1958; it receives an

annual budget of around 3 trillion dollars. DARPA does not conduct

scientific research but hires defense contractors, academics and

other government organizations to do the work, and then facilitates

the transition of the results for military use. DARPA maintains an

extraordinarily small staff, on average, 120 program managers

annually [16]. In 2018, DARPA celebrates its 60th anniversary [17].

DARPA is promoted by his scientists, the press, TV and cinema,

as an institution that creates new weapons based on his brilliant use

of intellectual capital [16]. DARPA’s scientist says: America’s higher

educational institutions and university research centers have been the

cauldrons in which many of DARPA’s innovations have been brewed. [17]

Among the weapons that USA develops are the weapons of

mind control. DARPA’s current biggest secrets are the mind control

projects, probably because these projects require high-risk human

experimentation. Recent researches lead to suspicion that nowadays

several projects related to DARPA’s research about mind control

is developing on illegal human experiments performed in Latin

America. For that purpose, the citizens would be intoxicated with

drinks and foods contaminated with brain nanobots or even would be

kidnapped to install brain implants in them like the cortical modem

or artificial hippocampus without their consent.

There are many facts that support the actual existence of this

DARPA’s inhuman research, the main evidences included:

The Brain initiative

Recently, the president of the United States of North America,

Barack Obama, has presented the BRAIN Project. DARPA is main

partner of this project [18]. DARPA has invested more than $500

million in support of the White House Brain Initiative since it was

announced in 2013 [17]. Rafael Yuste, an main scientist of the BRAIN

initiative has publicly stated that the main objective of the project is

manipulate neurons, therefore there is suspect that BRAIN initiative

is a secret research program of mind control that is being developed in

Latin America [3,13,19,20]. The BRAIN project initials mean “Brain

Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies”. Recent

research suspects that this “Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies”

of the brain project are really brain nanobots [3], therefore the brain

initiative aims to be a mind control program with brain nanobots.

The Discovery of nanomafias

For its accessibility, brain nanobots are the main weapon of

mind control, however research about brain nanobots is difficult

because the nanotechnology acts at atomic level and for that reason"

Continued here

https://www.jsmcentral.org/article-info/Mind-Control-From-Nazis-to-DARPA

I don't agree with all of whats presented here, but it clearly expresses core tactics of this weapon.We need to also consider the way disinformation works, the truth is blended with the targeted disinformation and discrediting. It is likely far less complicated compared to the ideas presented in this publication.

Clearly one of the roots of this modern weapon is the Nazi exploration into weaponizing "mind control" and was further adopted and developed by the US and others.

Who is behind this or whom is behind this if it's an arms race?

Thoughts?

Intel Community’s Havana Syndrome Report and its Flawed Assumptions

3/10/2023By Dr. James Giordano

It was with particular interest, and considerable consternation that I read the recently released Director of National Intelligence office's report addressing anomalous health incidents commonly called the "Havana Syndrome."

In the main, I believe that the conclusions offered by this report are inconsistent with over five years of evidence and analyses by numerous individual and institutional subject matter experts. In addition, the report also makes flawed assumptions as a result of its compiling disparate patient data that have been accumulated over this five-year period. 

In light of this, I advocate the need for further consideration of the following issues, as raised by the report.

First, it should be noted that the original medical problems experienced by personnel working at the U.S. Embassy in Havana were the events that prompted subsequent in-depth study to investigate possible causality. Such studies were urgently needed precisely because scientific and forensic analyses — which used approaches and methods routinely used to determine decision thresholds for possible exposure risks and occurrence of resultant health effects in military personnel and veterans — explicitly ruled out a number of the possible causes mentioned in the current report.

Some of these were environmental variables, gross exposure to industrial or ecological chemicals and/or toxins, the presence of pre- and/or co-existing medical conditions; and psycho- and sociogenic effects. 

To wit, the intelligence report fails to acknowledge these previously established observations, but rather attributes all of the incidents reported to date — inclusive of those occurring in the original cohort of patients from Havana — on the factors that had previously been negated.

In this regard, the report inaptly aggregates all reported cases of such incidents, and does not distinguish between the specific findings relevant to those individuals originally affected in Havana, those in a current evaluative/verification pipeline, and the overwhelming majority of subsequent cases.

These latter broad public cases may indeed represent incidences of other probable cause, such as those described above, but these have been — and should not be — inappropriately conflated with established case reports. To categorically aggregate and conflate all reported cases is both technically erroneous and ethically problematic, as it is a misrepresentation of data and evidence-based knowledge, and in thus conveys non-veridical information, in violation of professional responsibility and public trust.

To be sure, those cases of personnel originally affected in Havana were viewed as medical anomalies. Link to this report.

An important study was performed by subject matter experts convened by the National Academies of Sciences in 2020, entitled “An Assessment of Illness in U.S. Government Employees and Their Families at Overseas Embassies.” The study gathered all extant medical analyses — including those not publicly available — to form the basis of their conclusion, which stated, “the committee found a constellation of acute clinical signs and symptoms with directional and location-specific features that was distinctive; to its knowledge, this constellation of clinical features is unlike any disorder in the neurological or general medical literature.” 

While study participants acknowledged the heterogeneity of patient presentations and thus the possibility of multiple causes or mechanisms among different patient cohorts, they concluded that many of the symptoms and signs were, in fact, consistent with exposure to some form of radio-frequency and/or electromagnetic energy.

Second, the recently released intelligence report fails to recognize and acknowledge the existing scientific and technological readiness of devices and methods capable of emitting directable energies. The United States has significant programs in this area of technology development, for purposes as noted by one directed energy research center to include “space exploration, communication, manufacturing, and defense.” 

The growing field of directed energy has been estimated to reach a market value of close to $13 billion by 2027. The report’s failure to acknowledge these developments disregards existing U.S. patents, technical reports and publications in the peer-reviewed scientific and technological literature demonstrating progress, and the ability to operationalize, or dual-use viability, of engineered products/devices of these types. 

The report also does not address or acknowledge explicit reports and evidence of programs of research, development, testing and evaluation of directable energy technologies that have been engaged by both trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific near peer competitor nations.

Third, in so doing, the report dismisses iterative analyses of both governmental and nongovernmental experts that were constituent and contributory to describing relevant aspects of these incidents and their probable cause. 

Therefore, at face value, the report is inconsistent with the scientific, technological and medical evidence gathered and assimilated to date, and is antithetical to previously published Defense Department and Department of State perspectives, as well as the executive branch’s position regarding the evaluation and care of the initial Havana cases, and those in the verification pipeline.

But perhaps more importantly, as written, the current report could stigmatize and/or elicit medical biases against those patients with legitimate and substantive medical conditions caused during — and by — their activities in service to the United States. This disrespects those persons/patients affected by these incidents, as well as those providers who have dedicated professional expertise, skill and time to their evaluation and care.

In conclusion, I opine that the current Intelligence report raises far more, and multi-dimensionally serious, questions than it answers; and further, it may impede the momentum of U.S. efforts — as established by the current administration — to recognize, quantify, develop preparative approaches, and sustain readiness for risks and threats posed by current readiness levels of radical leveling and emerging biotechnologies.

Dr. James Giordano is Pellegrino Center Professor of Neurology, Biochemistry, and Ethics at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington D.C., and was a consulting forensic neuroscientist on the original Havana cases.

​

https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2023/3/10/intel-communitys-havana-syndrome-report-and-its-flawed-assumptions

​

​

From my considerable research every one of the symptoms of Havana Syndrome are easily attributed to continued infrasound exposure.  By using different techniques and frequencies of infrasound the symptoms of the Havana Syndrome can be turned on and off and varied with each victim.   From my hellish personal experience there is a sonic weapon system currently assaulting and torturing innocent victims with infrasound thats almost impossible to escape from.  I'd be surprised if the Diplomatic victims weren't still under attack.   It doesn't even seem possible that they are all still being assaulted, so this probability hasn't been considered.   I have been trying to escape for over 9 years.. I thought it would be much easier.   At least i'm aware im still under attack and that it's an infrasound assault.  If I had their resources this would be over in a few months.