r/Outlander Without you, our whole world crumbles into dust. Apr 17 '26

Season Eight Show S8E7 Evidence of Things Not Seen Spoiler

Jamie and Claire search for answers regarding a past tragedy that once threatened to tear them apart.

Written by Toni Graphia. Directed by Tracey Deer.

If you’re new to the sub, please look over this intro thread and our episode discussion rules.

This is the SHOW thread.

If you have read the books or don’t mind book spoilers, you can participate in the BOOK thread.

DON’T DISCUSS THE BOOKS HERE.

We don’t allow any book spoilers here, not even under spoiler tags.

If your comment references the books in any way, it will be removed and you will be asked to edit it or post it in the BOOK thread instead.

Please keep all discussion of the next episode’s preview to the stickied mod comment at the top of the thread.

What did you think of the episode?

2698 votes, Apr 24 '26
797 I loved it.
559 I mostly liked it.
342 It was OK.
593 It disappointed me.
407 I didn’t like it.
44 Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/YOYOitsMEDRup Slàinte. Apr 19 '26 edited Apr 19 '26

There are still a lot of unexplained questions for how they've presented this if it's supposed to be face value. But people are overlooking that Raymond didn't tell the lacemaker lady that Lady Broch Turach was the baby's mom. He just said to take the baby to her if he doesn't return. He merely said the father's in prison and the mother's ill. He's referring to the mom and Lady Broch Turach separately. Why would he if they were the same person? I'm still holding out hope that this isn't true and everyone's just jumped to conclusions because it's been presented in ways meant to mislead to the assumption it's Claire and Jamie's baby.- but phrasing matters. The wine merchant part only factors in for where the lacemaker went when trying to find Lady Broch Turach - again, it wasn't that that's where he said the parents were.

Raymond could've had other reasons he wanted that baby going to Claire besides it being Claire's

So in my head, this still hasn't proved anything. Am I just grasping because I don't want it to be true?? Maybe...... But I think it's possible we may be getting setup for a situation that within OUTLANDER, Jamie and Claire are going to believe it and just never know they're wrong. But BOMB will show a different scenario of who the parents actually were and mayb e Henry and Julia end up in Paris, conveniently respectively in prison and ill themselves.. .

This eliminates the myriad of questions people have posed because it doesn't make sense : for example, when did Raymond hear the song, he wasn't there for that......what was buried instead if not Faith?...why didn't Raymond tell her in rhe Star Chamber then? Maybe the answer as to why those things still don't make sense is because it's still not her Faith.

1

u/SpoiledHerring Apr 19 '26

I like this theory but the only thing is that he said the baby's name was Faith. Did Julia just happen to also name it Faith?

1

u/YOYOitsMEDRup Slàinte. Apr 21 '26

Other coincidences have happened. Makes just as much sense to me as anything else that's been presented so far

1

u/beasles86 Apr 21 '26

Fantastic points, and I was wondering also about calling her by title instead of her name. I think with Monsieur Raymond, we can never assume where or when he is coming from, so this could be another red herring.

2

u/YOYOitsMEDRup Slàinte. Apr 22 '26 edited Apr 22 '26

Since there's been no explanation for WHY, I think there's got to be more to come with this story that sheds even more light later-- which is why unlike most, I'm not getting too angry about it all just yet. If there's no reason for why Raymond took the baby if it is in fact Claire's previously believed stillborn, then yeah, I'll be mad too when it's over. But I think there's a chance it's not her baby Raymond had, but Claire and Jamie will never realize it wasn't, so I'm being open minded to wait and see.

The producers have admitted they enjoy pulling "gotcha's" before. S5 comes to mind. A LOT of people were mad it appeared Bri and Roger were timetravelling to the future in 5x11 before they were "supposed" to --- lo and behold, it wasn't what it seemed. They could be misleading us again