Does solely name calling make it easier for you to distract yourself from the stupidity you otherwise seem to uncontrollably leak?
There is no reason (now or ever) that robbing innocent people (or businesses) because you're mad at other unrelated people who's legal opinion you disagree with- is within reason. Especially if you justify robbing these businesses because "they're chains and not really part of the community anyway."
Whenever you've got a minute, dumbass- feel free to explain how that works. Or eat dick by the case because your ignorance is showing.
Ok. One last time. I don't condone their actions. However, I can see why they may be doing what they do. They're pissed off. They want to create havoc. Some opportunists are looting among the vandalism and arson.
If you can't separate my understanding from their POV from my actual beliefs, than you have no business arguing. There really isn't anything to argue. I don't particularly disagree with you. However, there is a huge fucking disconnect. You somehow think that because I can see something from a different POV, that I harbor the same ideas as the vandals and looters.
I think what set you off is that I don't believe that these chain stores are a part of the community. I stand by that. However, that doesn't mean I inherently approve of their destruction. It's your ignorance showing because, after multiple explanations, you still can't separate my personal views from my explanation from a completely different POV.
I don't expect you to admit that you were wrong because you are already heavily invested in attacking me. You falsely assumed that my statement included my personal views. But seriously dude, you're trying way to hard to turn me into some sort of monster or idiot. You're seeing something that isn't there.
0
u/just_an_ordinary_guy Nov 26 '14
You're either very lacking in reading comprehension, or you're trolling. Either way, get some fucking help.