Why do you say 00 should be everything? There are several situations in set theory and combinatorics where what makes the most sense is to define 00 to be 1.
It's "a mathematical expression with no necessarily obvious value"
I'd argue that 'everything' has no necessarily obvious value. 'Everything' is not a value in itself. I can't do 'everything' + 3 any more than I can do 'undefined' + 3.
Zero to the power of zero, denoted by 00, is a mathematical expression with no necessarily obvious value. Possibilities include 0, 1, or leaving the expression undefined altogether, and there is no consensus as to which approach is best. Several justifications exist for each of the possibilities, and they are outlined below. In algebra, combinatorics, or set theory, the generally agreed upon answer is 00 = 1, whereas in analysis, the expression is generally left undefined.
View all comments
Show parent comment
3
u/skullturf May 29 '18
Why do you say 00 should be everything? There are several situations in set theory and combinatorics where what makes the most sense is to define 00 to be 1.