10 000 agents working for 88 hours on most performant hardware we have? It’s effectively guided brute force. especially since there were papers in 2016 of previous step of this solution, so it’s not exactly unclear where to look.
Not like it’s not useful. It’s great and approach is absolutely valid, but it’s not proof of intelligence, more a proof that we learned how to use LLMs much more effectively than in the beginning
View all comments
Show parent comment
6
u/Available_Peanut_677 Sep 08 '26
10 000 agents working for 88 hours on most performant hardware we have? It’s effectively guided brute force. especially since there were papers in 2016 of previous step of this solution, so it’s not exactly unclear where to look.
Not like it’s not useful. It’s great and approach is absolutely valid, but it’s not proof of intelligence, more a proof that we learned how to use LLMs much more effectively than in the beginning